-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/09/12/a-great-idea/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
one of the most frustrating elements of existance in illinois for those of us who weren't born here or never aspired to come here is the absolutely parochial nature of illinois politics. so while i certainly hope the belief that illinois is all that matters continues for rich's sake (well, his pocketbook), it's extremely silly from a national perspective. this state is so screwed up that barack would have to do a lot more than pick up the phone for a few seconds to straighten anything out. a total loser of an idea from my perspective...
He's still our US Senator, isn't he?
No, Illinois newspapers/bloggers will shove it down his throat. Last I checked, it isn't his responsibility to referee all the goofiness in Springfield.
Carry on, Barack, with your regularly scheduled program.
John McCain is a Senator, too (ditto Biden - and Palin is a Governor). He just doesn't happen to be MY Senator. Let the people in AZ, DE, AK complain if they wish.
He doesn't have to referee "all the goofiness." Just this.
Call Baracks Senate office and let them in a polite fashion that Barack should pick up the phone and call President Jones and urge him to act!
I just did it, and it cant hurt anything. Furthermore, I bet if it were some of the naysayers jobs on the line in DNR and other agencies you would be willing to give anything a chance.
It just opens up Pandora's box for him to even make a phone call.
His campaign tactics are not our problem.
We have been waiting for Obama to do something to buck the status quo in Illinois. What does Obama think about Jones' disinterest in getting any work done until after November - when Jones' son is in office? Obama of all people knows Jones. What gives?
He won't return that call!
Issuing a short but pointed statement doesn't qualify as "refereeing". He's a current and former product of IL government, and his constituents, both current and prospective, have a right to know his opinion regarding this matter.
Prior to the SFY08 budget finally being 'resolved' I wrote to Durbin, imploring him to get involved with HIS state and try to knock some sense in to the little boys playing games back home. Several months later he replied to me. (I did appreciate the fact that he responded.) He (his staff) told me about all the difficulties in the FEDERAL budget process. There was nothing in my letter that should have misled him to believe that was my topic.
It is as if both of them forget who they are representing on the federal level. We are suffering in THEIR state on many levels and they have lost sight of who voted them in. Both Durbin & Obama need to get involved in the silliness we call politics and take a stand. I'll take off my Pollyanna hat now and step back in to reality!
What is the downside for Obama if he intervenes with Jones? Outside of temporarily ruffling a couple feathers there are no negatives. By intervening he could blunt the accurate criticism from McCain and Palin about his reformer record in Illinois, and do Illinoisans a service.
Rich, you are correct though in suggesting that there are important times which demand that an elected public servant start thinks and acting like a public servant and not a candidate. While we concede a certain selfishness to office holders for wanting to hold office or even secure higher office, we still do expect them to do some public service every now and then.
Then again, maybe we assume too much, maybe he could care less about addressing political corruption in Illinois.
I like it. It would change the subject. And what are they going to do about it?
I may be wrong, but there seemed to be a hint of condescension in those words. Apparently it's not easy being BN. Hopefully Senator BO will prevail in November, thus hastening the end of your exile to Illinois. Existence in Illinois...that's a heavy cross to bear for the enlightened.
Because he lives here?
THAT is a good question!
heroic behavior.
I'm so sick of this myth.
As we saw a kabillion times during Hillary Clinton's campaign, endorsements by popular African-American politicians of white candidates over qualified, viable black candidates rarely sway many African-American votes.
Stop the myths.
It won't work. While Hill the Thrill hit on it, he has largely skated on this issue with the Republican Mud Machine until now.
Over the next 45 days, expect to hear a lot more about the Chicago Machine, the Springfield Meltdown, and Obama's "record" on taking the risk of standing up to entrenched interests on his side of the street for the good of the people . . . and the lack thereof.
He talks the talk, but ain't never walked the walk.
Does he have an obligation to? Yes. Whether or not Obama likes it, he is still the elected public servant of Illinois. If he doesn't want that responsibility, he can always pull a Bob Dole in 1996 and resign from the Senate. If Obama loses the election, how will he explain his negligence to the state? Should he not sieze the easy opportunity to "buck his party" now, why shouldn't people consider him just another politician?
I am not saying that Durbin or Obama should be co-governors with Blago. But they should be willing to at least lend their opinion and support on basic issues like ethics reform without first consulting with campaign managers and spin doctors. And yes, if Arizona's government is as dysfunctional as Illinois' government, I would hope that McCain has weighed in on a few of those issues, too.
LOL!
Provide and opinion on the embattled ethics reform legislation? Absolutely not! That would require leadership in putting the state before Obama's own political ambitions. Not gonna happen...
Only because he happened to be elected in the state I reside in. He in no way represents me.
Barack has nothing to lose by calling Jones and inviting him to not be an obstructionist at this point in his career...If Jones doesn't comply, at least he can say he tried...Barack has been muc more interested in the last several years in his ascension to political prominence than he was in his salad days as a community organizer...that was a very long time ago koolaid drinkers...
As someone solidly in the McCain camp, this might be the one thing Obama could do that would make me think twice...
This is non-news. Obama ceased serving as U.S. Senator the day after we elected him. He has been running for President ever since.
Provide and opinion on the embattled ethics reform legislation? Absolutely not! That would require leadership in putting the state before Obama’s own political ambitions. Not gonna happen…===
Agreed. Obama is every bit the backbencher that Blagojevich was. I can't imagine a scenario that he would involve himself in this type of dispute since it doesn't gain him anything. Obama already assumes he will carry Illinois by a significant margin and, much like not spending money advertising here, he won't involve himself in something that won't help his election.
For Obama, it is ALL about the campaign. If he actually manages to keep his campaign afloat for the next 55 days and get elected, he will start the campaign for re-election 10 minutes after he is sworn in. Other than Blagojevich, I can't think of a more shallow and self-involved politician in Illinois today.
Hardly. He's got a record in the Senate. Rod never did compile one.
If Obama returns to the Senate; he will again rubber stamp Durbin (who himself is a rubber stamp for Harry Reid) when necessary, and slip back into obscurity otherwise. Our 'leadership' from top to bottom in this state has failed and it amazes me that these people are the "best" we can find.
Really? What is it? Coulda fooled me. These guys take no responsibility for anything other than piggy-backing onto someone else's legislation that has proven to be politically beneficial. And then they crow like Sunday dinner's rooster!
And when you say qualified and viable about Stroger you are off the mark. I think Obama actually delivered some important votes to Stroger. And while I don't agree that Emil "made" him US Senator, I think the Hyde Park/U of C $$ made him a viable candidate along with the fact that he is a very smooth operator, I don't think he is going to ring in on a topic that could make Emil uncomfortable.
Rich,
I completely disagree. His record in the Senate looks to be nothing more that a thinly-veiled attempt to fill in the right blanks on his resume to be a presidential candidate. That isn't to say that you could find a LOT of other pols that have records as thin, only that his list of accomplishments is pretty sparse.
It is also not helping things when the MSM makes these goofy statements comparing Obama to Lincoln, etc. Obama for me is far closer to a Jimmy Carter than Abraham Lincoln. I'm simply never going to agree with his stated positions (what little he has actually been pinned down on) and would never vote for the guy. None of this matters of course; Obama will win Illinois by at least 20 percentage points.
Letter from Sens Obama and Durbin:
"Today we write to urge your attention to one race in particular.
Our friend, Todd Stroger, former state representative and alderman,
is candidate for president of the Cook County Board. Please
consider voting for Todd.... Todd is a good progressive
Democrat, who will bring those values and sensibilities to the job."
Seems like an endorsement to me. Tod Stroger is no refeormer, nor was he expected to be.
Other than being otherwise engaged, Sen. Obama is additionally beholden to Emil Jones. If he had the temerity to shake things up all his political sponsors would be up in arms.
When you consider the positive spin he could get from the populist slant for simply asking for good government, it makes me shudder regarding what he would do on the international stage.
By the way, what record in the Senate? I appreciate that freshmen tend not to be leaders, but he has been nearly silent.
I was in office when the last set of Illinois ethics reforms were introduced. They were laughable. We would call the new rules the 'Lack of Ethics Reform Law"
Obama has been running for President since he was sworn in and this has been a disservice to the people of Illinois.
I know it's not true, you know it's not true, but this is a national media that is willing to take all kinds of claims on their face (See: 'Obama wants to teach sex ed to 5 year olds' as an example)
DNC spin, Sen Obama is a tool of the Chicago machine.