-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/30/all-sorts-of-weirdness/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Touchè, Rich.
TII!!
Interesting consideration, isn't it? Except without grants that give a base minimum, and no extra stipends for leadership, chairmanships, etc. Somehow, though, I think that kind of compensation arrangement won't even see a hint of draft legislation at LRB, much less a sponsor.
http://www.desilvalaw.com/firmprofile.jsp
Some guy pitches a game while playing for the White Sox and they call it "Perfect."
Not my idea of perfect.
Could you turn off the caps lock, please? Thanks
I think you may have glossed over this part too quickly:
{Commissioners have been investigating whether Froehlich used influence through Santana or anyone else to get tax breaks for businesses in Froehlich’s legislative district.}
Read that out lound to yourselves a couple of time and try to contain your laughter within rather than just exploding with laughter in an embarrasingly public display; especially of you are reading this on the train, or somewhere else where people can see you.
It's Thursday; and Boers and Bernstein are doing "WHO YOU CRAPPIN" at 5:00 p.m. live from McNally's, and I have to say there has got to be at least an honorable metnion nominee in this story for that program segment.
Raise your hand if you think that "Commissioners" actually have to investigate what was going on here with Santana; Froelich and company.
The "Commisioners" themselves are the one's that have been gaming the system at the Board of Review for decades; going back to when it was just the appointed Board of Tax Appeals with people like Harry Semrow and Wilson Frost. Don Erskine and Tom Lavin were the pre-cursors to the likes of people like Victor Santana, but his role is nothing more than the personification of history repeating itself in the Cook County property tax appeals scheme.
For a story to suggest that the "Commissioners" are somehow incredulous about this, and are conducting a comprehensive "investigation" to uncover what was happening there, and which they were otherwise in the dark on, could be worthy of a new Second City skit by the time this is over with.
Judge Mikva continuing to have Blago's back?
There's a lot of irony in your statement there. Hehe.
Chicago GOP can't spell Capitol Fax correctly.
Yes, very much the Doogie Howser of the legal world apparently, but it helps when you graduate U of C the same year you get your driver's license... What the hell?!
If you take a look at the profile, you will note that at some point between graduating U of C at age 16 and graduating law school at age 20 and practicing since age 21 she found time to work as a trader on the floor. Summer job? Or maybe that explains the year between graduation and when she actually was licensed as an attorney (1997 grad, 1998 license).
Cute dog though.
Seriously, I am sure Tamara is very smart and a very good lawyer. I can't imagine how she let her name get on those property tax cases.
Yes, busy day for the barrister... sun-times article today notes her questioning of Antoine Walker didnt get very far as she was defending, in criminal court, his alleged attacker...
From the sun-times...
"Cook County Judge Kenneth J. Wadas wouldn't let defendant Phillip Allison's attorney, R. Tamara De Silva grill Walker, sustaining most of the prosecutors' objections to De Silva's line of questioning."
... anyway, not to get too far afield, but lots of specialities and lots of newsworthy-ness for her today, apparently...
... as Rich said... "weirdness". ahem.
Hurt your feelings or funny?
The Chicago 9 and their acolytes have two stock responses to those who threaten their power: “It’s too complicated for a neophyte like you to understand†or “Shut up.†Dan got the daily double.
Mr. Ormsby suggests that the increased interest that Illinois bonds pay would be a financial boon to Illinois legislators. But he ignores the underlying reason for higher interest that any college freshman would understand: higher interest correlates with higher risk.
Does Mr. Ormsby think, in our current fiscal and economic climate, that a politician would accept as payment a bond that pays a high rate of interest, but also has a high probability of default? Do the people who issue these bonds truly believe that they will be redeemed at full value? If so, let’s put it to the test.
The point is to tie legislators to the long-term financial stability of the state. While we’re at it, let’s pay their pensions in state bonds as well. Only when our political class understands that their own retirement depends on their stewardship of their constituents’ retirement will we begin to get meaningful reform.
Illinois’ credit degradation follows its political degradation. We are now positioned at the low end of investment quality. The recent actions of the General Assembly confirm that Illinois’ governing class suffers from this fiscal shortcoming, derived from their inherent disconnect with the consequences of their reckless actions. The downgrade essentially confirms this recklessness. Which is why we need a new turn-around team in place. Investors just might find our state bonds, and our state itself, a bargain with a high probability for appreciation.
Proft For Governor
Cindy Lou, you are soooo right.
Why yes, yes they do. But more importantly, the bond buyers believe it too. Because never in the history of general obligation bond financing has a state NOT paid full value. It’s guaranteed in the bond agreements, which are enforced by our courts. And you'd think a candidate for governor would understand something so basic.
Ormsby and others have already pants’d Proft about this very basic finance 101 concept. Yet his “Profit from Governing™†campaign response repeats this already refuted, nonsensical point.
Speaking of weirdness, all of this new-found attention from the “Profit from Governing™†campaign must be kind of flattering Rich.
http://www.desilvalaw.com/Images.jsp
Here's the deal: bonds get paid first. Plenty of what they call "coverage" to take care of the juice and principle.
Everybody else? They get paid manana. Or whenever we have it. Or whenever.
With the background she alleges to have, why is she doing property tax appeals? Is it possible this is a case of stolen professional identity? In short, do the signatures on the bottom of the property tax forms match other known signatures of Ms. de Silva?
And there is a reason why the Illinois Review is known as the Crossroads of the Enabler Community. Any GOP incumbent gets cover, no matter how dishonest. Everyone knows for example there are GOP votes for another tax increase (in addition to the one they already passed this year). Jim Durkin for one said so on Chicago Tonight a few weeks ago.
Proft needs a tutorial from someone.
Let's take this at their word. Why don't we increase the Illinois debt-load four or five or six times. According to David, it's impossible for a state to default, so why don't just pay all our vendors and all our bills by increasing the debt? Why don't we just build that high-speed, mono-rail right now? Why wouldn't that work?
Look at Orange county's history, or check out Detroit today, or California today. When the spending class outspends its tax base, it's very easy to default. Mike Madigan and his Democrat buddies are ignoring the balance budget requirement of the state constitution and bringing us nearer and nearer bankruptcy, which is why the ratings agencies have downgraded IL bonds.
David, that's finance 101.
The state has any number of means to cure it's structural deficit, but the GA has chosen not to do so.
California is in a different category all together. It's so tied up in knots with citizen initiative mandates that its virtually paralyzed.
Fitch, in its Illinois downgrade, of course, did not mention bankruptcy. Read the report. Fitch would not have downgraded the state if Quinn's tax increase had passed.
Is that what you wanted?
http://rtamaradesilva.wordpress.com/