-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/30/another-twist/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Maybe they can twitter us
Pay for the spending with the tax increase that is clearly needed OR pass the cut budget and cut spending to match the revenues we have.
The latter choice would be put up or shut up for the Republicans and quite a few Democrats.
2. The press has given little attention to the fact that the borrowing scheme this year puts us in a deep budget hole for the next five. Imagine you only bring home $30,000 a year and you were about to put $2200 on your credit card.
3. If I had tons of AFSCME members in my district, I wouldn't go near ANY pension deal with a ten foot pole.
4. When in doubt, vote No. Sooner or later, someone will make you a better offer.
Yes, and many members won't for for a tax increase because they will have opposition.
This isn't a case where two parties are using drastically different economic estimates or feuding over two competing plans for the budget. Everyone knows that revenues are in the dumper and no one wants to cut services severely. So we have to pay the bills and the math is pretty basic.
My old guesstimate was a temporary income tax hike by July 7. I hereby abandon that fantasy and await the worst.
My best wishes for a Happy Fiscal New Year 2010 to all the Cap Fax visitors....
Big-time pension/salary/perks reform, cuts across the board. All suffer, no one gets a pass(including legislators).
EVEN IF THE STATE WERE SHUT DOWN COMPLETELY ALL YEAR, it would not solve the current budget deficit, even Rodogno acknowledged this fact. THEY NEED TO RAISE TAXES ASAP. STOP BEING SELFISH, PEOPLE WHO FIGHT A TAX HIKE, PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING AND DYING NOW, BEING TURNED AWAY FROM CARE.
Can you pay an extra $50-$100 per year in state tax or would you like people to be turned away from care, seniors, children, working poor, disabled people??? Also criminals will be released onto the streets, people with additions not treated, so crime will be going up very soon.
ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS. THE ERA OF "READ MY LIPS NO NEW TAXES" (NO RULES AND IRRESPONSIBILITY AND FANTASY WORLD OF TRICKLE-DOWN) IS OOOOOOOOOOVER.
They are back for a vote.
Actually, that just further compounds the holes in the budget.
And don't forget, fed stimulus money doesn't last forever....
Speaker Madigan is a fiscal conservative at heart. He also is a master strategist, but using human services providers as political pawns to make certain other political office holders look bad is not "Democratic Values", why liberals vote Democratic.
Not a happy day today. And the Speaker says that he will work to override the budget veto, and maintain the fiscal status quo? Sounds like he's channeling Terry Park to me...
The storm is coming, folks. I wonder if MJM has a raincoat?
I didn't like the Pension Obligation Bond in the first place; it was another case of "kicking the can down the road", and not a real solution. Well, folks, the can's still empty, and we've done run out of road!
Pass a big tax hike to clean up the mess while holding the spending at or below 09 levels. Make a 2-teir pension deal with AFSCME AND SIEOUANDSOMETIMES Y, and let's stop the games.
The incredible anti-incumbent feeling this disaster is generating will have effects that do not respect party lines.
Also, you would have corrections officers, teachers, and state police chasing criminals and risking their lives for 35 YEARS until AGE 67. You will create big time tensions between current workers and teachers and new hires.
Just some of the many reasons why this 2-tiered pension idea is absolutely unconscionable.
The criminal legislators need to pay up now and to make up for 40 years of stealing from us (the pension funds). That's right, stealing, instead of doing the correct thing and raising needed revenue all those years.
Exactly where does a public school teacher go from Illinois for "better pay"?
According to the NEA's latest rankings report, Illinois teachers have the 6th highest average salary, even though Illinois spending per student ranks only 16th.
We're also within about 10% of the highest paid teachers in the #1 fiscally dysfunctional state, California.
When you consider salary, benefits and cost of living, Illinois teachers are WAY ahead.
As a former teacher, I can tell you that the main reason we lose most of the "type A" people from teaching in the first 4 years is the unfair tenure laws and compensation schedules.
You claim that discord would result from a two tier pension program. How much animosity do you think is caused from ineffective and lazy "senior" staff member getting paid over $100K for nine months work while a younger, more effective and harder working teacher is only paid $40K for doing exactly the same job?
This results in most of those who can do something other than function in a government bureacracy leaving public education.
After 10 years in the system, I've found that two main types of people are in public education; those who truly love teaching and would be teachers even if it paid McDonald's salaries, and people who are virtually unemployable in any private sector job.
Based on Illinois student performance, there's little doubt as to which group predominates.
If you want the "best and the brightest" to enter and stay in public education, you'd do the following:
1) End tenure protection of poor teachers. Everyone should get, and maintain, their positions based upon the quality of service they deliver.
2) End "one size fits all" salary schedules for teachers. An aggressive, effective young teacher who makes those around him/her better SHOULD be rewarded far better than a failing teacher with 20 years experience who "phones it in" and fails the kids. The unions have contempt for the former and protect the latter.
3) End early retirement programs, and use resources to KEEP the life-changer teachers teaching, not pay them the equivalent of a full salary NOT to teach. When I left teaching at a private high school, I was replaced by a recently retired Science Department head at one of the highest performing public schools in Illinois. He loved teaching and he wasn't ready to quit, but being paid a six figure pension at 55 was just too good to pass up. When resources are used to actually HURT students, the policy NEEDS to change.
The only salvation for public education, IMHO, is for it to become more culturally entrepreneurial than bureaucratic, and I'm pessimisic that necessary reform can be made without funding the student rather than the system.
Change and improvement will only come with competition.