-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/08/29/bad-news-for-idot-leaders/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Was this the case?
Thanks,
Numbers
###Rich sez: I think it's fixed now. On my mobile so I can't easily check.###
Lo, do I hear the soft footsteps of The Red Fox?
Anyone want to bet that IDOT was directing J&B to take courses of action that would've gotten the firm itself into deep dog doo, or "rat caviar" as Alderman Burt Natarus would say, and that's the reason J&B wanted out?
what about robert millette and robin black?
Quinn for Governor!
Speaking of the Whitney campaign, Rich, have you heard about Gov. Cluck-o-vich the Democracy Chicken?
Perhaps he should start cleaning out his desk and plan on some extra time for his visits to Federal Court.
Mary lee has the potential to make this alot bigger deal. She gets published when it comes to this subject. She also needs to feel important. it has been a while since she got any bigtime press, So watch out uncle timmy, mikey and scotty boy she may make you famous. say rutan ten times slow.
VM -
Whatever those people did was approved by the bipartisan panel called JCAR-Joint Commission on Administrative Rules. VM, bipartisan means BOTH Democrats and Republicans. Sounds like you will be unable to spread the hypcrisy around to EVERYONE who deserves the label.
I am shocked...SHOCKED!
A pox on both their houses. The corruption issue is a wash this year with 2 candidates who are about equally dirty. In a Blue State that means the Dem wins.
There is also the problem of our feckless and corrupt legislators who, like the Chicago aldermen re Shakman, really don't want to see an improvement in the implementation of Rutan since that would make it more difficult for them to hire their relatives and to pay their campaign workers and contributors with state jobs. When Daley proposed turning hiring over to an independent bureau, the aldermen protested mightily (that's probably why he proposed it).
We aren't going to get any help from our legislators in this particular area of state government corruption.
Everyone is aware that the swing voters in this election don't know enough to oust this governor when even honest Democrats know he should be. But its dissapointing that regular Democrats would be happy to have him back if it means keeping all the slots blue. I never thought I would say it but thank God for the Madigans. I think they knew early on what a mistake this Governor was for the state. And say what you will about them, they do seem to be putting the state ahead of politics. Yes, I know it will help Lisa too but pushing an incompetent and corrupt Governor out the door deserves credit from all.
And admittedly the issue that will send him home is not the biggest reason he is a terrible Governor. The reason he has been a terrible Governor is what he has done to the long term fiscal stability of this state. All of our kids will have to pay for those mistakes.
The easiest way to fix all of these issues is to have a true reformer come into the position of Senate President or House Speaker or gubernatorial chief of staff. Even a couple of reform-minded agency chiefs would be welcome if it meant hiring and firing based on merit and performance. Or we need an actual commission within state government that would clean up the mess, and CMS or any inspector general doesn't cut it.
to the victor goes the spoils
Because Democrats desparate not to lose power after just 4 years will back their incumbant, even if he is corrupt, and swing voters are too illiterate to understand how bad this Governor is, it will take an indictment (or a lot of headlines heading that direction) to send him on his way. Very disturbing! I never thought I would say this but thank God Madigan for putting Illinois first and being clever enough to come up with the plan.
If we find she was dumped for actually trying to make sure Blagojevich complied with Rutan, then we'll know her past really was about the principals involved in Rutan, not democratic payback to Republicans by a rejected Walker nominee.
If we find she supported the firings, then we'll know it wasn't.
Wow. This is the best issue yet. Regardless of the Blago/IDOT intrigue, seems to me Mary Lee's reputation is on the line.
BTW, I would hardly put Sangamo and Bob-O-Link in the same category of private clubs. If Sangamo took NumbersGuy as a member, they can't be too exclusive.
We're all paying the price for the blunders that Martin and company have made. Everything was political under Ryan, but he looks like a petty thief compared to what the Blago boys are trying to get away with.
While some of you may doubt JBT, she's a straight shooter and exactly what the state needs to stop the disintegration of state gov't, its financial standing and the services it offers.
Or, we can re-elect a goofball that will be indicted along with many of his admin. in the next year or so. Wake up. There's a reality after Nov. And Blago cannot escape it regardless of campaign finances. What do people actually think is going to happen with this guy and his cronies after Nov.? That it's all going to go away???
Try focusing on next year and think about what you want in state gov't.
We have seen nothing but relatives or ole buddies hired at our agency and they are Democrats. However, we can still think of at least one husband-wife team who still have jobs (albeit elsewhere in the agency) after their terms were up and they are Republican. But their support is primarily local family...
For the most part, there are a considerable number of college buddies, childhood friends and the like of our new "leaders" who are making beaucop dinero - way beyond what they made prior to working for the state. And they ALL came in with this administration.
Heaven help us when we have real disaster on our hands - natural or otherwise - because the new staff do not know what to do and keep their long-term staff out of the loop.
In a subsequent position, the people and jobs were different but the Dem representation in the agency was about the same. (This was all under Thompson and Edgar.) Many old timers can recall the Dems who had a number of people in State jobs, from Howie Carroll a ways back to Jimmy DeLeo and Gary Hannig more recently.
I'm blessedly removed from all of that now, but my sense is that the Blago folks haven't broadly returned the favor. (the exceptions I'm aware of would really p*** off most local R's.)
What remains to be seen at IDOT, and several other places apparently, is twofold. Did the agencies violate Rutan and target Republicans for layoff? Moreover, not that the latter is exactly jaywalking, did they compromise the agencies' missions and services to the public as they "reformed and renewed?" Well, the jury is out, so to speak, and it appears the Cap Fax jury would for the most part vote to hang em high.
If he knew one got hired and got by him it was goodbye baby. Tell me it ain't so.
Compromising the mission does not begin to describe what this group has done. Look at the professionals who are leaving and the new hires set to take their place. More with less has been reversed and the “big picture†is now just a snapshot.
As for my democrats who are exempt, I guarantee you we will go out with grace and our heads held high--not whining and crying about our treatment.
As for this argument about "professionals", I found that word was the most overused word by Republicans who had become "professionals" by going from janitors to inventory supervisors to assistant directors, etc. etc. They learned to be professional by getting bumped up the political ladder by their commmitteeman and by Irv.
It wasn't that they were born that way, folks. If you give 10 Dems the same opportunities these Repubs have had they, too, would become "professionals".
FYI I was hired during the Walker admin. by the assistant District Engineer who was a Democrat. But the District Engineer was a Republican holdover from the Ogilvie admin. IDOT hired and fired some people according to politics from Walker thru Ryan, but there always seemed to be "party favors" for both parties according to the clout of some sponsoring state or US legislator, and some hires (engineers, technicians, etc.) where qualifications and ability, not politics, were the hiring criteria.
And BTW, I am an independent who has never done any political work for anyone, and I like it that way.
Irv was definitely savvy enough that he would have counseled a Repub administration not to target a Dem chair's daughter if the tables were turned.
But, that was the "old way."
what about the people who DIDN'T take voluntary reductions, had interviews and weren't highly paid that got laid off? They were just thrown in to make it look better. Martin, Stout and Doubet sacrificed good people to get to those who abused the system so anon....waht about them?!And by the way, have the voluntary reduction rules been changed?! nooooooo because you will probably do the same when your guy is out!