-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/09/22/2364/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Would that be possible to do?
Because papers like the SJ-R have shown no inclination to voice any kind of negative op-ed pieces against this guy.
Say what? Have you ever heard of Doug Finke or Bernie Schoenburg? They never miss an opportunity to jump all over Rod.
But based on the way that piece has shaped up over the past couple years, I wouldn't bet against the SJ-R giving Rod their endorsement....
Finke & Bernie do not equate to the paper's overall opinion...
Nice work on the power editorial boards wield over -'What is News.' The news, unlike Minvera (Wisdom) does not spring from the Head of Jove, but the bowels of Hephaestes - just to wax classical.
My question: did I break the law?
If I did, it should be obvious, and then I go to jail. But that never happens with any of these 'allegations' against the governor, does it? What he is doing is not illegal. If it were, he'd be in jail.
The problem, my friends, is not with BLAGO. It is with how our state government is organized. If the governor can legally throw around hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars on a whim on pork, procurement, jobs, etc.to his buddies, THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH THE GOVERNOR, IT IS WITH HOW THE STATE GOVERNMENT IS ORGANIZED.
You think Blago is bad, wait until someone *TRULY* brilliant and seriously sinister comes along and turns Illinois into the Fourth Reich. If the rules here are so lax that the head dude in charge can do all this on a daily basis LEGALLY, we really got big problems here, people.
From here on out, I am no longer going to bash the governor. It doesn't make sense to. He is using the rules to his advantage. Who wouldn't?
Blago is the product of the system, not the cause of it.
We are the point in our regular historical cycle where politics is so bad that the very best people generally won’t get involved. So all of the comments about dumb and dumber, less and lesser, are accurate. And no doubt applicable nationwide.
Which brings me to my second point: I would have flunked the focus group tests too because I assume that the Governor and his opponent are equally problematic. In fact, my friends and I are counting on the next governor being indicted (quickly, we hope). Which leaves the real choice between Quinn and Birkett – and that’s no choice at all.
Had the Republicans pandered to the middle with their Lt Gov’s choice, a lot of Dems would not mind voting for JBT but Birkett is the show stopper.
So I watch the press for reports on Pat Quinn in hopes he’s still around when the dust finally settles.
If you can't back it up, don't say it.
Also, please provide me with accurate info as to why Pat Quinn, is so squeaky clean, or do you forget his run as State Treasurer....
The views on Pat Quinn are at best viewed-through dem-provided glasses
Your article reflects exactly my sentiments. For all it was worth, I was trying to let everyone I knew how corrupt Ryan was when he ran against Poshard. It made me sick to think that the public and a lot of the press ignored the "smoke" coming from the federal investigations against Ryan's administration.
I think it's all happening again with Blago's administration (at least as far as the general public is concerned).
I'm trying to learn not to care and just vote my concience. *sigh*
We should give Judy a chance and hold her accountable to do what Rod promised he would do.
Re JBT - Rich's point in his column was that voters aren't examing the finer points. The scandals, etc., on all candidates are just flashing by our eyes. There is probably a lot of guilt by association.
Re Quinn - his actions related to some issues that are important to me are clearly superior to Birkett's.
Maybe I should be looking at the next person in line when they are all indicted -- is that Mike Madigan?
Is that like what my son wanted when I made him be banker in Monopoly.
He asked if he got a "banker's tip" for giving me money.
You make a good point that these investigations are about two further along than with Ryan. It begs the questions about whether Rod will be indicted during his next term (assuming reelection), rather it coming after he leaves office.
The untold story now is the very real possibility that Pat Quinn stands a good chance of becoming governor sometime in the next four years. Whether you love or hate him, it would shake up state government in really profound ways.
If Blagojevich is re-elected, it sends a message almost as damning as when Ryan was elected. We didn't know what we would get when either of these guys received first terms, but now we know who Rod really is. If we vote for Blagojevich, what are we condoning?
1.) We'd be saying we don't mind unethical behavior.
2.) We'd be saying that we are partisan more than sensible.
3.) We'd be saying that unless you have a crappy running mate, and are actually indicted, you have our vote.
4.) We'd be saying that unless there are handcuffs on your wrists, you can be governor.
5.) We'd be saying it is OK to promise reform after an incumbant is drove from office for fraud, then behave the same way.
6.) We'd be saying that we are freakin' idiots.
In this latest incident Blagojevich flies to New York on a private jet paid for by Levine (who will be pleading guilty in November) to get Blagojevich to New York for a money grab trip. Blagojevich then meets with a former Democratic congressman (forced out of office for accepting illegal campaign gifts) at a swank New York club for millionaires. Blagojevich even accepts a $10,000 dollar check from this disgraced former congressman. Blagojevich then accepts thousands of dollars from law firms and lawyers during this trip that soon show up on the preferred list for the TRS.
Blagojevich’s response ‘none of this is connected’. Let’s ask ourselves ‘Is this excuse reasonable’
To anyone who would throw away 3 years of very hard work in law school, unless rich uncle moneybucks paid for it, you need psychological help. What is with these crazy lawyers who keep getting busted and then disbarred?