-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/08/14/checkmate-on-madigan/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
With the veto power, can the governor actually change where dollars are going?
Why bother having a legislature when one person apparently knows what's best for Illinois?
Disgusting. Pathetic. Shameful. Etc.
Now Jones is on the MJM's S-list for backsliding and twisting the knife on the way in. Should make for a VERY interesting fall session, let alone the Gov's Day tomorrow at the fair.
I would imagine Emil may use this as a trump card to also kicksta
Most or all of the Medicaid program is funded across fiscal years and reimbursements are paid as bills are presented. If the State changes the eligibility for health care coverage administratively (JCAR blockable?), then the bills get paid as they come in from health care providers.
Yes, he probably can do it. But it is an absolute violation of Constitutional intent in the scope of the Veto powers. The General Assembly may have only itself to blame for how they set up Medicaid bills payments, but a court order challenge or at least an Attorney General's opinion is warranted.
THe Governor forum shopped, going to Taylorville, on employee salary payments in this limbo period. I wonder if he will run back to that favorable jurisdiction to have that same judge issue an approval for this outrage.
The House overrides the veto, and Jones and Blago wear the shirt for a shutdown
Madigan covered his back by line iteming the "pork". Lots of Senators will have to vote against specific projects in their own district in favor of the Governor's health care plan.
I don’t see how this changes anything.
The House overrides the veto, and Jones and Blago wear the shirt for a shutdown
No if the Speaker overrides, then Jones sits. The Budget stand as the Gov has changed it.
I have seen a lot of the Senate Dem members who are NOT happy and did not sign up for this. THe so the question is, Does the Gov veto all pork but the Sen Dem lump? TO let Emils members spend the pork (that some have already promised)?
He's making up powers. He's now in the same Constitutional fantasyland as the Bush signing statements and if we were to try and spend that money, it's an impeachable offense. This isn't about the person or the policy, it's about the integrity of the institution. He cannot do this and if he tries, he must be stopped by the other two branches.
The latest update appeared as I started to write–the Governor of Illinois has no authority to appropriate money period. That is strictly the purview of the Legislature.
Untrue. A lot of expansions (an example would be the grants the GOv is talking about), he is thinking he can set these by rule. Technically he is correct, however, JCAR has the ultimate authority IF they decide to rule on it. WHich i think they will do, and shoot him down. But, he will get some of the money through rule at the agency that distributes money for the already existing program. As much as i hate to think it will happen, and think it is a run around the system, the Gov has demonstrated this in the past (stem cell research), and he will probably get away with some of it. He is an embarasement to ILLINOIS.
The reality is that this is a pretty sharp rebuke by Rod for all those who declared him irrelevant. Whether you like him (surely there are some who fit in this category) or not, the governor of the state has a lot of power and he's demonstrating this now.
That means that everything except the "pork" can start being spent. School money, state workers salary, etc.
So, this essentially keeps Gov't running, but then they argue over "pork" vs. healthcare.
And whatever else they want to argue about, I guess.
The Governor can change the rules if JCAR goes along. However, that does not appropriate money for that purpose. If he's going to play a game of chicken with the health care provision rules he can try, but I will still say that the Court is likely to take a very dim view of regulations that specifically try to appropriate money not appropriated by the General Assembly.
This is like a scheme thought up by a bunch of stoned guys in a dorm room.
One has to ask themself “what’s in it for Jonesâ€.Does his stepson get more state contracts? Do they change the name of U of Ill. to Jones Univ
No they change Chicago State to Jones Univ :)
Just so folks are familiar with how things play out, the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, or JCAR, can essentially veto any proposed rule changes from the administration with the support of 8 out of the 12 members on the bipartisan, bicameral committee. For the arithmetically-challenged, each caucus has 3 votes on the committee, meaning President Jones does not have enough votes to block JCAR from blocking the Governor.
Too bad he will leave before accomplishing his goal of education reform because it could have been done this year if he didn't jump in bed with the Governor. He is throwing 30 years of service away.
Emil cant be trusted he is stalling an ethics bill that would expose his familys connection to sub contractors and pouring more and more money into chicago state for bar bills and cruises for administrators Emil Jones needs to be removed from his position. I believe more thn enough votes can be found for new leadership.
Can not be done till the 95th GA is closed (January, 09).
What does Emil gain by this? I'm hard pressed to think of anything. He stands to lose a lot and I wouldn't be surprised if you don't hear rumors about him retiring in 2008 leaving the mess for his successor. SDEMs are probably thanking Emil for selling them down the river as we speak.
Sports fans that means the number of doctors willing to treat the poor is going to be thissss small.
Nice job guys.
The Guv. has a lot of cojones, unfortunately he's using them in a losing battle. I think that between the Speaker, the AG and the Supreme Court, if necessary, we're about to find out where the real power lies.
In this situation, I like the line from the "Untouchables":
"He pulls a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue! That's the Chicago way!"
Blagojevich is taking a hammer to the Constitutional balance of power.
I don't expect Hynes will go along with the Governor as Appropriator.
But the folks who should REALLY be freaking out are the CTA and Cook County Hospital, not to mention the Laborer's Union and everyone else who was hoping for agreement on other budget issues.
How can anyone hope for agreement on a plan to do anything else between the Four Tops?
If I were Senate Democrats, I'd be shopping for a new leader. From the AP:
Democratic Senator Kwame Raoul says health care is important and the governor is doing everything possible to cover people who lack insurance. But he wishes the maneuver had been discussed with rank & file Senate Democrats.
Ya think?
But that's within an agency--hence it's nearly impossible to move from health care programs from a pork program that is likely to be in another category of spending.
Jones ego far exceeds naming Chicago State after him. Considering Jones twisted logic it must be U. of Ill. that will now be renamed Jones Univ.
I would also say that if this Governor is even thinking of a third term, it will be awfully hard to overcome the targeted direct mail resulting from such line item vetoes. He took money away from kids, old people, the local library . . . you name it.
What's mystifying to me, though, is how little of this garbage sticks to Emil Jones in the public eye. He bears at least as much responsibility for the gamesmanship as the Governor does.
It's my kind of place.
Just twirlin' around on the dance floor puts a big smile on my face.
No cover charge.
Come as you are.
Mmmm, I love this bar."
The rest of the budget becomes law AS SOON AS the Governor does his item vetos. That means we have a budget, minues the pork, in a day or two.
it's a sad sad state of affairs.
and you should do your homework.
Again - the other news is no more shutdown talk.
The rest of the budget becomes law AS SOON AS the Governor does his item vetos. That means we have a budget, minues the pork, in a day or two.
I'm not sure anyone knows!
If he thinks that the Gov. does not have the statutory authority to spend in this way, then he won't process the warrants/vouchers.
Is it obvious only to me that the gov has some nasty pictures of Emil tucked away somewhere?
"I’m not sure anyone knows! "
Good point! LOL. He DOES have 60 days, right?
“j,†please. Instead of defending the guv’s move, you attack the motivation of his critics? Try again.
---
Rich, I wasn't being serious. I thought it was obvious. Sorry.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not applauding this move. But as a practical matter, while I agree with those who say he can't spend the $500 million, he certainly can line out the $500 million. It's just like a child who is ignored and doesn't get what he wants so he throws a temper tantrum. Rod is jumping up and down and promising to hold his breath until he gets his way.
I was being facetious (not serious).
I don't doubt that some of the House members projects do good things, but I wonder if any of those blasting health care for families have ever gone without health care?
Let the House members defend each and everyone of their projects. I suspect more than a few won't look forward to their pet projects being debated on the chamber floor. The spotlight might get a little too bright for them.
I didn't know that Emil could bend over that fsr to kiss the Governor's mistletoe, but I guess I was wrong. He has sucked the State dry for his own family's aggrandizement, and nobody in the black caucus will stand up to him.
The Governor's carnal assault on the State had changed the definition of the offense from the traditional: any penetration no matter how slight. The knew one is the Bryllcream version: a little dab'l do you.
Why, if you were a growing business seeking to expand would you in your right mind want to submit the well being of your company and the workers to this Colloqium of Dunces. All this and we have the bite mites too.
Gov and Emil just walked away this afternoon after dropping their bomb, taking no questions, and the shrieks of complaint from the media rattled the dome rafters. They are NOT going to let Blago get away without answering the hard questions.
It was worth the wait.
I tend to agree with our host's interpretation of the constitution regarding the Gov's ability to create spending authority. However we live in the world of defining what the meaning of is is by a bunch of self centered flacks.
I can see so far the Mr. Jones will do what he can to skewer any good will from the Madigan clan.
I hate to say it, butI'm starting to feel wisful about the type of government that Ryan (mis)managed.
At least this makes the Gov's transportation bills look small.
Blagojevich believes his administration is squeaky clean. He better hope so -- because a single sobpoena -- one -- will sink this adminstration completely.
Prove it - Please!
I am Ethical / I am Honest / I am Hard Working
NOT !!!! NOT !!!!! NOT !!!!
1. Emil's stock as a leader plummets. This will be one huge reniging on a deal with his fellow leaders. What will really burn the other leaders is Emil having agreed to cut their stuff, while leaving in SenDem stuff. That's what will happen, just watch.
2. The House will hold hearings (perhaps a committe of the whole) to learn more about this "pork." The "member iniatives" account for $200 million (or only $150 million if Emil's stuff is preserved), so the bulk will come out of road fund projects, university and community college projects, etc. This will all be solid, needed stuff...probably even some critical bridge repairs. A House override will be easy (especially since that's the legislative deal), and the district heat on Senators to follow the House lead with an override will be intense. Emil may have caucus trouble in following the course he outlined today.
3. The best Rod can get is for his reductions/line item vetoes to stand (there is neither a Constitutional nor legislatively viable way to increase appropriations for health care). [Madigan was so, so, so right on insisting that the budget be placed on a HB as a "check" on the word of his Senate counterpart.] In this "best case for Rod senario" you get all pain, no gain. More folks to be unhappy with Rod. Madigan can live with that.
4. Rod will end up an even bigger loser, even before Patrick Fitzgerald fully weighs in, and Emil could become the lamest of lame ducks.
In the mean time I hope it gets report just what type of "pork" he's cutting. Libraries, police, fire.
Just because he didn't get his way he whines and takes some kind of power. I mean who is this guy. I wish more people paid attention and realized what is going on in Springfield.
In the meantime we still can't pay our Medicaid bills or fund transit. Just when you think it can't get any worse.
Our representatives in government should be doing what the voters have told them they want. Reform our education system, pay for the promised pensions of governmental workers, quit borrowing money, and pay the bills.
The representatives and senators who are lucky enough to get pork in this travesty should provide some sort of healthcare screening and treatment for their constituents with their share of the "pork" if that is what their district's voters demand.
Disgusting....
Second - Who's going to make Frank Watson a T-shirt that says, "What's that about a sincere bone in your body."
Blago knows:
Health Care = Good. It gets him a lot of press. He saw Romney do health care in MA, get tons of press and run for president.
is worth a shot. and why not. Pork or
healthcare? That's an easy call. and if Lisa
Madigan has to weigh in on the legal dispute and
does not side with health care, woe to her. this
looks good for the people of Illinois.
Yes, but I prefer Indictment.
I understand that blago didn't do very well in constitutional law, passing with a "C" and all, but he still passed the course and show understand the limits on his authority and powers as governor.
Yes, but he got an A+ in his Megalomania Class.
2. It seems to me that Blago has never been interested in an agreement on a budget. He could not have been so stupid as to think that a 9 per cent tax on corporate revenues (a siezure of assets for those businesses not in the black)would ever be accepted by Illinois legislators.
3. I continue to believe that the Governor is after some big game and that he's not alone in the hunt. Playing good chess requires a long view. Let's start considering who might profit from the terminal embarrassment of the Speaker.
Just when you think it can't get any worse...
Nothing has been kept secret. When you call a veteran Democrat leader a "conservative Republican", I think you've said a lot about your intentions. We're used to intemperate remarks from our politicians, but I see Blago's as dangerous threats.
A narcissistic personality cares only about his goals.
I'm just not positive that you are going to find a ton of GA members willing to make stupid deals to save these types of projects. I'd rather tell the locals "I tried but the Gov took your money away" than be held hostage for a deal I don't like.
The member initiatives can be used by individual Reps back home to badmouth the Gov. Once the budget is in place, the house doesn't have to pass any other measure the Gov. wants. Madigan isn't under any deadline to do anything. He can let the courts sort out the "reappropriation" and say NO every time the Gov or Emil call.
What part of the Governor signing the budget and vetoing the initiatives is a "loss" for Madigan? On the other hand, which part of no health care, capital bill, GRT is a "win" for the Gov?
BUT remember BIMP bills are still pending...Will session resume?
Who on jcar is going to vote against breast and cervical cancer screenings for all women in Illinois?
This is war folks and it's going to get a lot better before it's over.
Happy Dem Day Guvna. Gloat while you can but you have just opened up a big can of whup a.
Sometimes I sense that Blago posts this kind of tripe, just to be cute - Ain't working, buddy.
Two years ago, the Black Caucus walked off the floor mins. before the budget was called. They went into the Speaker's office and came out with more projects.
If these projects are so good, how about a little light on them in the form of a floor debate on each one during the House's override votes.
The mushrooms are getting off too easy here folks. And when did Speaker Madigan become the patron saint of Illinois? I'm sure you GOP members love this but keep in mind, he will be working to hand your butts in the next election.
The Speaker may not even try an override here.
"I accept the governor's constitutional authority to veto these lines. We have a budget. See ya' in a few months"
He lets Lisa, Dan Hynes, the courts and JCAR take on the idiotic notion that the Governor can appropriate money as he sees fit.
And the Speaker and Tom come back only if for a plan that covers a capital budget and mass transit.
Of course, JCAR is going to be a big impediment to getting the rules through. BTW, HFS clearly lied to JCAR this morning when asked if they planned to implement new rules regarding healthcare initiatives. They said no this morning, and yet within hours the Governor's had indicated they would file rules tomorrow. Unfortunately, integrity is in short supply for those who serve in this administration and this is especially evident at HFS.
The already did make a movie out of it! It was called "Duck Soup"!
/"Hail, hail Freedonia!"
//Rufus T. Firefly lives!
///Seriously, someone needs to stop the madness.
Really, gov, go tuck the kids in - it's time for them to be in bed.
At least Madigan is working. The only thing Jones works at is getting his name engraved on every state building and sign that the governor missed.
I am not a fan of Madigan but, compared to the likes of Jones and PeterPressRelease he is a breath of spring air.
By the way - each of the House member initiatives are spelled out. Most deal with grants to public safety, schools, etc. There are some items that don't pass the smell test but most look OK. Compare this to the dripping, lump-sum pork-fest that the Senate sent over and you can see why criticism of Madigan on this is unwarranted.
Can someone explain to me how - not two days ago - Blago was railing on Madigan for a 'technically out-of-balance budget' when it appears he is going to strip $500M in 'pork' and then restore it (thus maintaining the out-of-balance state)? What is the difference? Would a $500M reduction at least get the budget closer to balanced?
This governor makes so many promises and tells so many lies he can't keep them all straight.
Seriously, do I smell more of a reason to push for recall powers and a constitutional convention? Oh wait we don't need a constition, Blago can do whatever he wants.
Don't disregard the possibility that the Gov sprung this on HFS in the same way that he's been governing by press release all along. The HFS people I know are pretty straight shooters, so I doubt they'd have lied outright this AM if they knew when they testified.
What would Dean Martin Do? That's an excellent philosophy to live by. I'm off to have a nightcap.
The pork is not pork to the people who live in the 118 House Districts and 21 (or is it 22?) Senate Districts that will see projects cut.
And, I'm a big supporter of universal, single payer health coverage, and any other expansion of health care coverage. But this is not the right approach; and it harms any long term prospects for real reforms.
This is the same Governor who screwed up on prescription drug price relief; his program ended up costing more than it saved the individuals. This nutty plan looks like it's heading in the same direction. Moreover, if the Governor implements this plan as a direct slap to the GA, why would the fund it next year or the year after?
I'm not surprised the Campaign for Better Health Care supports this. Those guys have hindered the movement for universal health care coverage at least as much as they help it.
The Gov has virtually one friend on the hill that plays both sides of the fence, and his staff is too weak to tell him otherwise.
This entire situation reminds me of not only a Shakespeare play called "Macbeth" but also of a Greek tragedy involving a character named Oedipus sans the whole eye and mother thing and replaced by a hair and illigitmate child thing.
So let me get this correct. All the gov’s enemies say the “pork†the House had in the budget was “good porkâ€. Providing heath care to a family who does not have it is “bad porkâ€. You people are beyond belief.
I don’t doubt that some of the House members projects do good things, but I wonder if any of those blasting health care for families have ever gone without health care?
Let the House members defend each and everyone of their projects. I suspect more than a few won’t look forward to their pet projects being debated on the chamber floor. The spotlight might get a little too bright for them."
TO "Give Me A Break":
It's not about healthcare for all being looked at badly. It's because the Governor has promised so many things with state money that never come to fruition. $500 to each college sophomore; money for schools (sent a check to one school - it bounced!); huge sums to All Kids before it is determined that any medical services will accept it; money for infrastructure and our roads and bridges are a mess; funding pensions plans fully, then turning tail and robbing them instead; and on and on.
The man cannot keep his word and no one trusts him. And all the a--kissing in the world will not change that fact.
From this geek's perspective, I'm saddened that I have to be vehemently opposed to a healthcare increase, but I am because I understand that is not the subject at hand in this little play.
(d) The Governor may reduce or veto any item of appropriations in a bill presented to him. Portions of a bill not reduced or vetoed shall become law. An item vetoed shall be returned to the house in which it originated and may become law in the same manner as a vetoed bill. An item reduced in amount shall be returned to the house in which it originated and may be restored to its original amount in the same manner as a vetoed bill except that the required record vote shall be a majority of the members elected to each house. If a reduced item is not so restored, it shall become law in the reduced amount.
(e) The Governor may return a bill together with specific recommendations for change to the house in which it originated. The bill shall be considered in the same manner as a vetoed bill but the specific recommendations may be accepted by a record vote of a majority of the members elected to each house. Such bill shall be presented again to the Governor and if he certifies that such acceptance conforms to his specific recommendations, the bill shall become law. If he does not so certify, he shall return it as a vetoed bill to the house in which it originated.
We'll see if this enhanced level of mistrust will lead to an agreed solution for a capital bill and a bailout for the CTA/RTA.
I'm not betting the farm on it!
All expansions will require administrative rule changes to implement, and it's not likely that any of the new rules can be filed as emergency rules, since no budgetary or programatic emergency exists. The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR)who will approve or deny these rules is comprised of 3 members from each legislative caucus, so the Senate Dems have only 3 out of 12 members. It takes 8 votes to reject administrative rules, so the JCAR can absolutely stop these expansions with 6 Republican votes and 3 House Dem votes. However, can stop and will stop are two different concepts. One thing is for certain, it's certainly not boring with this Administration.