-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/03/23/cook-gop-backing-pulido/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Did you not read any of the post? How do you defend the comments she made? More importantly, how do you defend your statement that she would be the best Congressman elected in Cook this decade in light of these ridiculous and insensitive comments.
Perfect example of why the Cook GOP is in the state it is. Bad candidates, even worse supporters.
As for the Ku Klux Klan, remember that former Mexican President Vincente Fox just years ago not-to-subtly called African-Americans racist and vehemently defended putting a thick-lipped characature on their postage stamps.
On the serious side, some day I would like to actually see a viable republican candidate again on a state level. But at this rate, I may be too old to go to the polls by the time they train up a new generation of decent candidates. It has to start at the local grass-roots level, school boards, aldermen, county boards, then mayors. Start the kids off right in school, leave all the old failed ideas behind and start fresh. That's the only way.
You're right; the IL GOP is getting their just desserts. Even worse, they're going to keep shouting in circles and blaming Teh Machine Demz for their demise.
Pulido cares so deeply about American workers she wants the government buying weapons made in Russia.
Also, at a VFW forum Pulido claimed the Blagojevich administration spent millions on making illegal aliens citizens.
The woman makes no distinction between legal immigrants and people who have overstayed their visas.
Pulido may be another Alan Keyes as her Bible comments suggest, but it would be nice if people could argue with her on principle and not just throw insults.
What precisely is the principled response to Pulido's post that Muslims at prayer remind me "of my dog, smelling buts"?
A wack-job can raise some valid points and still be a wack-job. I'd prefer to spend time arguing (and electing) a sane person, who makes the same points. You, for instance, sound like a thoughtful individual. If I were you, I'd make the arguments, but distance myself from Pulido.
This, of course, fully explains her position on gays.
Puh-leeeze.
Not only should they cover this woman-she would represent 650,000 people in congress while those chicago aldermen they cover represent 5,000-they should spend more time on the illinois republican party. Less ink from the sun-times on the appointment of the latest deputy assistant undersecretary of the bureau of administration and compliance or from the trib on how gay bars don't allow bachelorette parties would free up space for more important matters.
Agrees that Mexicans are the KKK with a tan - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/196111...
Hates Spanish so much that hearing it enrages her - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/193811...
Thinks that theft is an integral part of the Mexican culture - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/193296...
Note that none of those have anything to do with illegal immigrants. She's a racist. This raises an interesting question - how well do you really know her?
Roseanne should stop thumping that Bible and start reading it.
1 John 2:11 But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.
1 John 4:20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
Is it possible that Keyes and Pulido are part of some diabolical Democratic conspiracy? Is there a more reasonable explanation?
Point taken, but what do you do when your choice is between the wack job vs. the sane person who you think will do grave harm? In this case I agree that she goes beyond the pale (see Rich's hightlight on gays), but some of the quotes he put up do not support that, and the reflexive response in some of the early comments go to the need for substance I'm writing about.
PS: I need to say it somewhere: Congrats to Waukegan on a great season and near-legendary comeback against Whitney Young!
Are you referring to Mexicans as the new KKK, or Obama selling his race back into slavery, because I'm totally confused here.
How can you have a meaningful discussion with somebody who says things like that? Seriously, please enlighten me.
I think Rich is trying to make something of nothing on a 3 week old local news story on NBC (wonder if some democrat operative pitched it to him?)
They were busy castigating Andy McKenna a week and a half ago at a party open meeting in Lake County for not throwing all of the GOP's resources in support of Pulido, and for not calling Washington's RNCC to send in the calvary.
When Pulido loses, they will blame McKenna "for his lack of support", and not Pulido and her views. If McKenna had come out in strong support of one of the other GOP candidates, they would have blamed McKenna for influencing the primary so that a "True Republican" (in their eyes) would not win that primary.
And so the endless treadmill that the Illinois GOP is on continues.
Oh we should forgive David Duke, he's kept his mouth shut for years :) (Well he's been in federal Prison) But at least his mouth was shut :)
wow, Lou Atsaves is right, here we go again blaming the Democrats for your problems.....
There are many examples in American history when a party had to take a stand to keep the extremes out.
One was the DFL in Minnesota, where the Humphreys, Mondales and Andersons successfully fought, sometimes mano a mano, like hell to expel the Communists, all the while backing Civil Rights and fighting the Birch/McCarthy GOP on other fronts.
Or, on the other hand, you could look at the Iowa GOP, where the Main Street GOP went like lambs to the slaughter when the Pat Robertson folks took over the state party.
And for those who are blaming the GOP for putting her forward, remember that she won the votes of 800 people...I don't think the GOP deserves much of the blame for the votes of the extreme fringe.
and we were worried the retired of ChopperJim might leaves short handed. It looks like we have found BrickHeadJoe's running mate.
Good Luck GOPS.
Are you referring to Mexicans as the new KKK, or Obama selling his race back into slavery, because I’m totally confused here."
1) As I wrote and maybe you missed, I said some of her comments were beyond the pale and that she was another Alan Keyes. That said, when the PRESIDENT OF MEXICO uses polite language to call African Americans a bunch of lazy you-know-whats (which was protested by Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton but largely ignored in the mainstream media) and polls show some pretty deep racism among Latin Americans against African-Americans (which presumptively would be reflected by illegal immigrants from those nations) there are a few grains of truth in some of those statements ("will unleash real racism", "they hate blacks").
Rich, I guarantee you that if illegal immigration had the same effect on upper class jobs that the research shows it has on the working class and African-Americans in particular, half the pols out there would be Tom Tarcreno clones.
Again,
Finally, a comment that may seem cruel but it's a cruel world: the status quo is not all that bad a deal for illegal immigrants. Ask someone in a Darfur refugee camp how they would like a chance to make what illegal immigrants here make, with emergency health care, education for their kids, and most importantly citizenship for their children born here. I'm just saying it's not immoral to take care of our poor first.
http://borjas.typepad.com/
If you scroll down just a little, you see he discusses on study (he co-did with two others) which says that the effect of illegal immigration from 1960 - present caused African-American unemployment to increase nearly 6%, and decreased African-American wages 2.5%.
It should also be noted that Cesar Chavez was an opponent of illegal immigration for the same reasons -- he knew how powerful business interests would use it to undermine labor power.
THough I don't have links, there were studies out of, as I recall, U of California Berkely supporting the Proposition 11 balot initiative in California showing that the costs of illegal immigration on the state substantially outweighed the benefits (in taxes, etc.) For more cites I would dig up Nick Kristof and Paul Krugman's NY Time columns from the period when this was a hot political topic (I think their recent archives are free, but not certain).
As I said, I am aware of one study that theorized illegal immigration was putting a strain on US Healthcare but did not find a substantial effect.
This was all put out by Joshua Hoyte in the primary down to the very Free Republic posting we are talking about here.
I was trying to spare the voters Ms. Pulido's unhinged rants, and the GOP the shame of having to claim her as one of their own. At least now everyone knows just how odd this lady is.
Pity she stayed on the ballot. She filed 702 signatures, but had only 369 valid ones... However the R's in my district are so weak she only needed 319. So now we have to let the voters end this farce and send her back to wherever Mr. Oberweis is now.
p.s. NOONE likes illegal immigration, which is why some of us are working so hard to find actual solutions, instead of spouting rhetoric and hate.
We get plenty of posts here where conversations go all over the place. I would've deleted every one of those comments if she tried to make them here.
I understand perfectly well. I'm surprised you think I'm stupid.
I hope the relevant GOP Chairmen will do the same.
Unfortunately, the Cook GOP has no "volunteers, signs and grassroots support" to give. Roupas is clueless.
I'm not real excited about Pulido's campaign myself, and that district is unwinnable for any Republican right now anyway.
But she's far from the nuttiest candidate the GOP's ever fielded in Illinois.
I think you'll find many more bats in Topinka's belfry for example, and much crazier quotes. Like remember when Judy said her rolling pin was an assault weapon?
If you want to criticize her for standing up for the rule of law and our constitution, that reflects more on you than on her. She has something that is precious today: intellectual honesty and the courage to stand by what is right. It is no surprise that leftists would attack a conservative latina and try to marginalize her for being "off the reservation" and not towing the (marxist) party line of Saul Alinsky and fellow travelers.
It should come as no surprise that her campaign finds its greatest support among seniors, veterans groups, Chicago Policemen and Chicago Firemen. Her endorsements include Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Lake County, IL Sheriff Mark Curran, Jr. These individuals witness the real impacts of illegal immigration on America. They see firsthand the disproportionate carnage on our highways and streets by unlicensed, uninsured illegals. They see our overcrowded jails and prisons filled with illegal alien gangs incarcerated for violent crimes against our citizens. These are real impacts for them every day.