-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/10/27/dan-rutherfords-new-tv-ad/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Yeah, there's going to be some controversy. That's what happens when a bigot makes racist comments in his ads.
Is he trying to help turn-out for Todd Stroger, or what?
Ken Mehlman would be proud.
To take a swing at Jesse's age, and a remark that smacks of racism, I seriously doubt a dem would have ran this ad that may really disturb seniors and minorities. I am neither and it offends me.
IMO this is the face of todays Republican party, the Carl Rove "nothings off limits". Attacking Mike Smith about his acknowledged weight problem is another example. I am not saying they are all "over the top" but it seems to be a common style turned to once to often.
What is ironic to me is how the dems could use personal attack ads, employing innuendo based on rumors and speculation, in this race and one other, but to this point have not and I don't believe they ever will.
(snark)
They forgot to add black to Jesse's eyes to make him look even more sinister. That's the current GOP strategy for winning elections, doncha know -- pull the racism card from out of your sleeve.
(/snark)
Levois, don't hold Rutherford's youth and inexperience against him. Maybe you should let Reagan's fans know about your concern regarding the age of elected officials.
You Democrats are like the boy who cried wolf! Your a bigot if you bring up a black guy hiring his relatives. Your a bigot if your against illegal immigration. Your a bigot if your against homosexual marriage. Your a bigot if you want to cut government spending. Your a bigot if you want the national language to be english. You guys never answer the charge or offer answers you just call people names. It is getting old
Keep smilin Dan, keep smilin when filming these types of ads. Your smiles and smirks help the electorate understand how you really feel.
The age mention is a bit cheap but not egregious.
GO DAN !
I have to disagree with your assertion that Senator Rutherford is a bigot based on this ad. Maybe you are talking about something else that I don't know about. If so, back it up.
Your pull quote is misleading. The 'R' in 'your' was clearly pronounced. I support Jesse White, and I am not trying to pick a fight with you but I think that EVERYBODY (including all of us) should be called out when they unfairly pull the race card in either direction. It is just too divisive and is often a red herring.
The term "Who's your daddy?" is part of the vernacular for better or worse.
I will say that the Senator probably should have consulted with ANY weatherman in ANY market over 5,000 people about how to act in front of a green screen. A lot of misdirected pointing going on.
As for age, that was 1/2 of Bean's campaign against Crane 2 years ago.
As for the 'age' comment, that was totally uncalled-for and added nothing to the ad. Probably p*ed off a few seniors is all. 72 isn't that old anymore. McCain will be that old in '08. Reagan was 73 in '84.
“Talk about whose your Daddyâ€Â. I am not African American but I believe I know how they will perceive that remark.
Is he trying to help turn-out for Todd Stroger, or what?
So black people only vote when they're angry about white people. They all think alike. They just keep reproducing, I can't even tell who's who.
Rich, is this Tennessee Capitol Fax?
It's okay though, because some of my best friends are, you know, and I watched Showtime at The Apollo once....
Racism masquerading as political insight is sooo weak and beneath everyone here.
It's a shame because his main point is really compelling. People HATE nepotism, particularly on the scale practiced by White.
A slang term meaning "I control you", which is often used in prison and by members of the underworld. The expression, which can be traced back to the mid 1800's, has two sets of connotations: "I am looking after you" or "you are defenseless". The former usage may be derived from the term "sugar daddy," and often has sexually suggestive undertones; the latter usage may allude to parental dominance and authority.
Today, the expression "who's your daddy" is commonly used as an assertion of domination or sexual control in return for payment or protection. It is also sometimes used literally, as an insult questioning a person's parentage.
So, whether Rutherford is insinuating that Jesse White is a gangbanger, sugar daddy, making sexual references toward Jesse White's daughter, or questioning her parentage, it doesn't matter.
George Ryan was convicted of shoveling "money for nothing" into his kids pockets, and we didn't hear Dan Rutherford say boo about it, let alone "Who's yer Daddy?" Why? Because George Ryan is white and Jesse White is black.
If you don't think the ad is racist and sexist, picture George Ryan's face up there along side his son-in-law's, with Dan Rutherford saying "Who's yer Daddy." Tell me it strikes the same note.
And yes, attacking Jesse White for his age was moronic. When a virtual unknown personally attacks a popular incumbent, a public backlash is guaranteed. This was a desperate Hail Mary from Dan Rutherford, who has been the generous beneficiary of Democratic kindness toward his own personal life. That may soon be coming to an end.
I don't know if you need a geography lesson or a 2006 copy of the IL political atlas.
I'm not voting for him, I just think people should get they're facts right. He's a dumb downstater, not a dumb suburbanite.
I wonder what percentage of voters who actually show up at the polls (and GOP primary voters) are age 72 and above . . .what a bad thing for him to do.
GN (not a Republican Precinct Committeeman BTW)
I guess one might if they were trying to convince people to vote for them, but maybe that's just me.
I personally think the age thing was a bigger faux pas. Seniors vote and like to think they are still productive citizens. I don't think the age crack will play well with them.
Otherwise I think the nepotism issue resonates with people, and Rutherford had to go negative if he wants to even have the slightest chance in this race (which I personally don't think he does).
It's one thing to decide that you're not going down without a fight.
It's another to wait to start fighting until your ship is already sunk, and then start taking pot shots below the belt.
Aside from the crude racial epithet and ageism, it isn't a very good ad, trying to crame way too many allegations into a single spot. It reaks of desperation and frustration, but Rutherford has no one to blame but himself for his campaign's miserable failure. If he really wanted to win, he should've spent the last 10 months doing something besides touring GOP Rubber Chicken Dinners.
Rich, I hope you let me keep this posted. If I say anything out of line, please let me know...I'm doing my best not to be snarky.
WW
As an Hispanic, I can assure the RNCC that it is losing a generation of Hispanic voters. McCain is considered a hero in the Hispanic community, and by denouncing the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill, which DOESN'T provide for an amnesty, the GOP is ensuring its LT demise.
Roskam may beat Duckworth in this race, due to the ads (and I'm not even certain of that, as affluent Americans, of ANY race, embrace immigrants, undocumented and otherwise, in numbers FAR greater than middle- and lower-income Americans), but the GOP will continue to lose Hispanic support.
And please note that Univision and Telemundo have featured the GOP's anti-Hispanic ads in their national evening newscasts.
It was also revealed that White's Chief of Staff, Tom Benigno, hired his own wife on a no-bid contact, circumventing state hiring procedures, to be an 18-month part-time secretary. In addition, the new biography out about Jesse White was written voluntarily by Rick Davis. It has now been exposed that Davis is a no-bid $73,000-a-year contractual employee of White.
Most Democrats I know don't think badly of Rutherford, but this might change that.
What was he thinking running against Jesse, anyway? He should have at least formed a tumbling team first.
There is a lot of hypocricy on this.
That being said Jesse White cannot be beat and Rutherford will be beat bad.
Rich Miller will delete anything real bad on Jesse White even if true, and the media doesn't want to go into this, and when they rarely do people don't care and he is like teflon.
Jesse White can smile, have his tumblers do some flips and talk in some platitudes.
Really? Where does one keep a ton of corruption? In the garage?
I thought the speculative rumors that Rich was referring to were about Rutherford. Now I feel totally left out!
GO JESSE!!!
If you will: please find any front line employee at the SOS office and ask if things have changed for the better since Jesse took office. If they are honest, you will find out that corruption still permeates through the office, Dirksen facility, Howelett, bldg, etc. Those who have made complaints have been met with scrutiny and bias. I speak as a 22plus year employee who has seen more corruption than I want to admit to. The inmates are surely running the asylum under White. A vote for White is another vote for business as usual.
Rather than attack Rutherford by dismissing him as a racist, the writers here supporting JW should detail the facts about White's record that they feel contradict Rutherford's charges. Is it or is it not true that there are 18 relatives on the SOS payroll? Didn't Jesse ignore warnings in the media about Cecil Turner's character when he hired him? And what were Turner's QUALIFICATIONS aside from being the Vice Chair of the Sangamon Dems? It's corruption pure and simple and Rutherford is zeroing in on it. Jesse can't tumble himself out of these facts.
Most Illinoisans will come to the same conclusion--that except for her Daddy, White's daughter's supreme qualifications would not have been "discovered" by any other Secretary of State to justify her salary being tripled. That was simply done because her Daddy could do it and thought he was politically untouchable.
Rutherford is like Harry Truman. He's not giving White and the Dems hell, he's just telling it like it is. Wait and see how this resonates.