-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/03/03/early-5th-district-thread/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Fritchey has 36, 45, 47, and 33 with him and Mell has troops in 39 and the Latino areas.
Floating armies formerly with the Mayor are with Fritchey in 38 and 41. Most of the Western Suburbs have endorsed Fritchey and some have machine like control.
If it is low turnout it is a precinct captains election.
O'Connor has 41 (the new committeeman with the same name, 40 obviously, 39, plus Slick Degnan, Skinny Sheehan, Rod McCullogh, tons of operatives from the Mayor, the 11th ward and the 19th ward. Fritchey has more operatives from the 5th District.
Problem for Fritchey is too many candidates and guys like Forys have been quitely working his Polish base and now Capparelli is really consolidating the conservative side. But can they get the Polish or Conservative Dem voters out?
Low turnout usually favors the machine.
But the question is where is the vote coming from?
eg if it is from the East end it favors Quigley and Sarah Fiegenholtz.
Most polls show Quigley leading but that is due to name recognition and also the anti-Stroger feel. Fiegenholtz can we if she gets 40% of the female vote and 5% of the male vote. The female thing could pull it out. The question again is WHO IS COMING TO THE POLLS?
NO workers or signs for any other candidate - I was pretty surprised. I heard that this was the case elsewhere. And this was in the eastern part of the district.
Less posting to CapFax, more palmcards and door knocking.
Love,
Fritchey supporters who can't be out working this morning
From what I hear the Polish guy has some real traction. Even some of the regular captains that are Polish in the Chicago Wards have snuck over.
This low turnout is making me re-think we need a special election for Burris.
LOL
No one needs 50% of the vote. If one person gets 9% and everyone else gets less, that person wins the primary...
That is becoming a higher percentage of the vote each time.
But, its still anyone's game. Should be interesting to hear the spin after the ballots are cast. I wish I still lived in the District just to be part of the fun.
This is anyones game.
Even though, after voting in every election for 7 years as a Democrat, they've never knocked on my door.
As for workers, I saw a Feigenholtz guy putting up signs at the Bal Harbour building (420 W. Belmont -- not a polling location, but close to 2 or 3 others), and a Fritchey guy passing out info cards outside the Belmont L station. Must be trying to get people to vote later tonight -- at 9am, everyone there is heading downtown.
A very dangerous assumption. There are a lot of folks who consider it their patriotic duty to vote, but not to learn much about the candidates.
At western end of 44th ward, my wife was #6 at 7 am. A friend in 32nd ward (Belmont/Leavitt) was #4 at 6:40 am.
A ground game is making sure your id'd voters show up at the polls.
Sad, but true.
Which is why, someday over the rainbow, we should move to IRV -- Instant Runoff Voting.
In a nutshell: "IRV is a voting system for single-winner elections that guarantees majority winners in a single round of voting. IRV allows voters to vote their hopes instead of their fears by ranking candidates in order of preference without worrying about spoiler dynamics or wasted votes." -- www.InstantRunoff.com
So -- who else but goo-goos support IRV?
Well, during the 92nd session of the General Assembly, we had Senate Bill 1789. Didn't go anywhere. http://www.fairvote.org/?page=2188
The sponsors, you ask? Oh, a couple of obscure back-bench guys. John Cullerton. Barack Obama.
Rich, I agree...but I suspect that this is less of an impact in a special election with only one race and on a day on which people aren't accustomed to voting.
To the extent this phenomenon does occur, who do you think it favors? I'd say it favors O'Connor in his ward and nearby wards, Monteguado in the Latino precincts, Forys in the Polish areas, and Sara generally with women. I don't know that pollworkers will sway many of these less-informed patriots, do you?
Well, I guess there is the lunch hour rush and after work crowds.
The goofy looking polish doctor wins.
Good Luck today.
lolololololololololol
Charlie Cook rates the 5th as D +18. Good luck winning there with the most knee-jerk reactionary Republican of them all.
I think turnout is headed to about 46,000 but I need to see more turnout counts to really see.
Headed back out...
One palm passer for Fritchey in W47, 16 P, which shares a voting place with another precinct. At 10 AM less than 35 voters. No one at the Amvets hall, across Western, no one at Welles Park. Some Fritchey and Whellan signs on Western.
As far as IDing voters, I was greeted by the Democratic poll watcher with a "YOU live in my area?" Yep, for almost 20 years at the same address. And a relatively reliable voter too for about 10. Maybe they should walk around a bit more?
Note: I've never seen a GOP poll watcher, though I've seen Green poll watchers.
I was voter #32 in my precinct today. Thought it was strange, but I proudly pulled the lever for Rostenkowski.