-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/02/05/election-day-experiences/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
The line was getting longer by the time I left.
Tons of yard signs up in front of the building (it's also facing a main drag).
The Tribbies also have a comment thread going on people's voting experiences. Lots of folks seem to be being asked for ID. You don't need an ID to vote, your signature just has to match the sig on record.
The surprising thing is there were no canvassers. Usually there are at least 2 groups.
Unfortunately, due to other obligations, my involvement in the process will be extremely limited today, which is unfortunate.
Only contested races are for U.S. President for Dems and GOP and the Seals/Footlik Congressional on the Democrat side.
We are also voting for our city aldermen today. All are running uncontested races.
I went back at 7:15 and was able to vote. Still disorganized, even more crowded. Ald. Flores and others were out front handing out Moreno palm cards.
The whole experience was kind of a mess.
A note about the 14th Congressional district special primary: Only a handful of that 70+ people who voted in the regular had voted in the special primary. Part of the problem was that when you received your regular ballot they made no mention of the extra race. After voting the regular, you needed to go to a different table to get the special ballot and vote again. Less than 10% were actually doing this. My guess is any candidate who pushed to inform their supporters of this goofy system will have a huge leg up in this. Could we see one set of candidates win for the November election and another for the March special election?
At my polling place, a lady had her maiden name on the voter roll, but her married name on her ID. I don't know how that turned out, but the judges were working on it.
400 voters 85 had voted, huge R few Ds. of the 85 77 had voted in the special
the other precint was running about the same or ahead. Looking at 25% tunrout already
Todd
It was good to see quite a few young people working as election judges.
I noticed there were a lot fewer political signs and there were no "decorated" cars in the polling place parking lot.
Ward: 35
Precinct: 28
I went to go vote at about 7:15 AM. I could see a couple people inside at tables, but the polling place was locked. There were two guys just standing around right outside the entrance.
I asked one of them where the entrance to the polling place was, and he replied that the machines for this precinct had been shipped somewhere else, and hadn't arrive yet. This is 75 minutes after polls opened! He told me that I could cast a provisional ballot at another precinct (WHICH IS FALSE), or come back later. THE GUY WAS NOT AN ELECTION JUDGE.
I left because I had to get to work. I didn't say anything to the goons outside, but I was furious at the disinformation that they had tried to give me. I called the Chicago Board of Elections as soon as I got into work. They had had one other complaint at 6:20am, but no one had followed up.
The agent at the CBoE was very knowledgeable and nice and called me back to let me know when the machines were up and running (about ten minutes after I called, now a little after 8am). The election judges at the site, in addition to the goons, were also telling people they could cast a provisional ballot at another precinct (AGAIN, NOT TRUE), and she had to "correct" them.
I'm still pretty upest by it. I'm going to have an opportunity to go again after work, but I have to imagine there's a lot of people in my precinct whose only opportunity to vote was sometime between 6am-8am.
I'm not making any accusations, and I have no evidence of anything, but if anyone were to benefit from this particular situation, it would be Richard Bradley over Iris Martinez.
I made sure to check everything twice before hitting the submit button.
At about 7:15 am, I was voter number 35, which is higher than the last (runoff) election, and a little higher than the general muni elections, and about the same as last November's election.
There were, I think, 4 other people voting when I inserted my ballot into the machine, and there was one person getting his ballot, and another couple came in as I left. So, that would put things at 42 just after I left.
One complaint, they had different poll workers this time around. There was a younger white guy who seemed a little too eager to help a couple of people load their ballots into the machine. He was young, so it may be inexperience, and I didn't notice anything truly suspicious beyond his general exuberance.
Ok, so two complaints, and this is the bigger one. They reconfigured the setup of the voting booths. They were MUCH less private than in the past. They had 5 booths set up in the middle of the room, with the opening set to the outside. In the past, they lined up all five by the wall, with the opening facing the wall. Someone could easily look over your shoulder and see how you're voting.
Alright, one final complaint. They didn't have the ballot protection slips (the folders you put your ballot in when you finish voting and are walking over to the machine.
I will also note that I voted in the 32nd ward, Club Lucky precinct.
There was one poll worker outside, standing around. He didn't do or say anything to me or anyone else who walked by. No palm cards in hand or anything. Not sure what he was doing.
There were probably 2 poll watchers inside, neither were paying much attention, although one of them may not have been a watcher. He may have been a judge trying to get the touchscreen to work.
The arrangement of the privacy things was appalling. Waaaaay too open.
Also, the judge was NOT checking ID's, so at least that went correctly. I just told her my name, and she had me sign the paper and check the party box.
There are multiple credible reports of judges demanding that voters show ID out in DuPage County too.
If the A.G., taxmandan, Downers Delight or any other concerned citizen wants to ask the DuPage Election Commission to remind their judges that voters don't have to show ID to cast a ballot in the Land of Lincoln, the number is (630) 407-5600 -- then press zero to talk to an honest-to-goodness human being.
-- SCAM
I believe that there two instances where you need to show an ID. If someone is voting for the first time after registering by mail then they are required to show an ID. The other is if you've been removed from the voter roll, you need to prove that you still live at that address.
Sounds like some of the election judges are just ID'ing everyone.
Precinct: 11
Went at about 7:30 this morning. The standard set up of Shulter's men handing out cards and signs for all his candidates everywhere. The only exception is that Susan Elder got a few signs squeezed in.
The turnout at that point was light. No line. The stack of Republican ballots looked awfully lonely. I saw lots of folks using Schulter's cheat sheet in the booth.
Everything was moving smoothly and no one was asked to show ID.
My wife and I took our standard photo of our son holding our "I voted" tickets. Vote early, vote often!
I have already heard about serious errors with the Kane County Elections system again this year--incorrect ballot forms and failure to place referendum questions on all precincts. Smiling Jack Cunningham has failed his constitutents again.
Today many signs were stuck in the snow on the way to my second ward, fifth-district polling place, wanting us to vote for Dunkin for third-ward committeeman and for Kenny Johnson or Paul Chada, who're running in the 26th district.
There are usually checkers to see how things are going that stop by the place at least once during the day, just to be sure all is well and going according to rules ect.
Judges asked which ballot then entered request, access code slip given and sent me to a booth inwhich ballot appeared after I entered my access code. Easy. I do my thing, it has me review and final cast of vote is verified by me before I hit the final cast vote .
I took my youngest son with me this morning to cast his very first vote. Being his first time he thought it was stupid to have to select a Republican or Democrat or Green ballot, even though I tried to pre-explain the process to him----what does he do? He asks for a Hillary ballot. Oh, well, they gave him the right ballot and he's pleased with himself casting his first vote.
Before voting, I was working a polling place in the 2nd Ward (for Will Burns). There were 2 precincts. One was running smoothly but the other was a mess. From the voters exiting, it seems that the demand for extra help for our local schools is well heeded, as some of the judges couldn't even read.
I think, I really didnt pay attention. No lines, though.
Nor was I asked for an ID.
But I am sure it's just judges confused about early voting vs. regular one.
Those of you who were upset at being asked for ID, why did that bother you? I'm not saying you shouldn't be upset about it, I'm just wondering what the argument against it is.
And my second optical scan ballot jammed. They had to open the machine and manually push it down in the bin.
Besides, ask any 18, 19, or 20 year old college kid, getting a fake ID isn't exactly difficult so it does jack squat to prevent vote fraud. I never had a fake, but I knew at least a dozen people in college who did. And I went to school in 19-bar entry age land (champaign), so, getting served was never a problem.
All requiring ID does is makes it tougher to vote if you don't have an ID. And there is no requirement in this country, thank god, to have a photo ID.
Election judges are just citizens helping out on election day whereas voter registrars at libraries, city hall, the DMV, or elsewhere are appointed to their positions by authorized officials (e.g. certain government officials, county political party chairmen, etc).
Do you think those who are against photo IDs to vote are for honest elections?
The question answers itself.
Virtually everyone has a photo ID.
Just imagine what life would be like for a person who did not have a photo ID.
The only universe a person can think of who might not be able to have a photo ID are those who have mental problems.
The people who are against photo IDs are the same ones who want these people to be able to vote.
Yes Rich, COMMON SENSE does not have to be written in black and white for you to stop cheating.
A Green poll watcher is live blogging from Chicago: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?
fuseaction=blog.view&am;
p;friendID=188400239&
blogID=354973039
When I left I asked about political signs and polling places as there was one 25 feet from the door of where I vote and one about 40 feet. They said it was legal. I said I didn't think so. I called the county and they said they are supposed to be 100 feet from the door. I went by later and the one that was 25 feet had been removed but the guy had one about 40 feet away and they let that stay.
Politics as usual in Rock Island County.
All the choices were clearly displayed on the sheet. First I signed on the line and then she pointed where the parties were and asked me to check one off. I checked democratic, and then she handed me a Democratic ballot. The choices, clearly shown, were Democratic, Republican, Green, and No Party (or something like that).
I don't see how she could have avoided displaying the Green Party as one of my choices when it's clearly printed right above where I signed. So your complaints smell a little fishy right now.
I was asked for ID when I voted this AM at about 6:30. I told the election worker that I didn't have an ID on me, and that I didn't need one. The other workers discussed it and agreed with me, so I was allowed to vote. I later called the committeeman and asked him to make sure the workers were following the law.
The law about signs at the polling place is 100 feet from the door of the room to where you vote. It is hard to determine unless the judges mark the spot. And many who do mark or come out to shoo us campaingers away, do not know about the 100 feet from the room.
There were booths open, but at 2:40 it was a hopping place with several folks coming in as other finished up. The other precinct (that I could see) was also busy.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm
?fuseaction=blog.view&fri
endID=188400239&blogID=354973039
An Exerpt:
"About 20 minutes ago an Electioneer from the Bradley campaign (the one that continually comes up in here) was checking in with the female Election Judge, who appears to be acting as his Pollwatcher (not appropriate), and then sat in her place at the table and began recording information on her forms and his own. Any possible shred of impartiality surrounding the Election Judges in here is ruined."
"Further, Illinois voters now use some form of electronic voting technology that has made it harder to commit the old forms of voter fraud such as stuffing ballot boxes, says Steve Sturm, an attorney for the Illinois State Board of Elections. . . .
Kankakee County Clerk Bruce Clark said a frequent question to his office is from election judges trying to verify a voter does in fact meet residency requirements. . . .
In the rare instance voters might be challenged when trying to vote, Sturm recommends they take along a voter's registration card, driver's license or some other form of identification as well as a utility bill or something else that shows their current address. . . ."
I'm wearing my "I VOTED" sticker upside down as a protest of the poor quality candidates we've been offered.
I'd love to see the law changed to require photo ID to vote.
I pulled a Dem ballot -- was NOT asked to write "Democrat" or "Republican" as others in DuPage/Kane counties have mentioned. I also voted electronically for the first time. I don't like the system at all...how much paper is the elctronic system wasting by printing little receipts? And how do I write-in a candidate, is that possible? I don't even know.
Also was disappointed in the lack of choices on my ballot, but that's a different topic for a different day. Took D to vote Obama.
How do you propose to avoid disenfranchising those voters without ids?
I had a better election day day experience than the ladies in this Tribune story:
"An election judge was charged with battery Tuesday morning after punching another judge at a 42nd Ward West Loop polling place *** The female judges, whose party affiliations were not immediately known, were quarreling over "procedures" when one punched the other in the face."
http://tinyurl.com/2juh52
-- SCAM
Can anyone tell me what the net effect would be if I voted Barack for President and then voted for all six of Hillary's delegates? Not saying I did, mind; just curious.
I've been a pollwatcher before, and the intimidation factor in asking for ID is particularly bad when there's a language issue. I saw several older immigrants, who were clearly registered, flummoxed by judges questioning them about their ID, their address, if they are registered. No question that if I hadn't intervened they would have left without voting and been disenfranchised.
Local voters were shocked to find parking access to two 46th Ward polling places blocked by singer Marilyn Manson’s set-up crews. The Lawrence House (4th pct.) and United Winthrop Towers (6th pct.) at 1020 W Lawrence and 4848 N. Winthrop, respectively, suffered from parking woes from 6:00 a.m. to late afternoon. The Chicago Bureau of Traffic Services provided the Aragon Ballroom with two Police Tow Zones and 20th and 23rd District Police provided local residents with tickets and tows. The tow zones, in force on for both sides of the 1100 block of West Lawrence and south end of the 4800 block of North Winthrop, forced those voters not living in those two low income high rise buildings to walk from blocks away (or not vote.)
While Aragon monopolized the streets and blocked the alleys, its two parking lots remained unutilized. Where were Dem. Committeeman Tom Not-So-Sharpe and Ald. Helen Shiller as this was going on?
And if somebody had already come in and voted for you, you wouldn't have been able to vote either.
"I saw several older immigrants, who were clearly registered, flummoxed by judges questioning them about their ID, their address, if they are registered."
So now the Judges can't ask a person if they are registered and if so at what address?
Very busy, had local issues on ballot, also primary for Denny Hastert's seat.
10 voting booths just for Campton 7, and they had been full since 7 AM according to workers there, with always 6-7 people in line.
Local issues driving the turnout, which sure was looking good according to staff.
Moved to a new precinct location (brand new church with large parking lot), and the parking lot was literally packed - People were waiting for somebody to leave, then taking the empty spot. Turnout was really something.
Local races (Village of Campton Hills board; Kane County Board chair; & Denny Hastert's seat) looked to be the big draws.
Saw a stream of people in line, holding one of the competing mailers over the opposing slates regarding the Village of Campton Hills board. Feelings are running hot over that issue.
Judge: Name please?
Elderly voter with son: Her name is ___.
Judge: Do you have ID ma'am?
ME: They don't need ID.
Judge: I can't understand her name, I need ID.
ME: They don't need ID.
Judge: Do you really live in this precinct? What name did you register with? Can you spell that? I can't understand you. Show me an ID because I can't understand you.
Voter: (looks helplessly at son, edges towards door)
ME: They don't need ID.
Judge: You have to tell me your name in English or I won't look it up.
ME: Can you write down your name for the judge?
And since the judges don't like to be called on this they give voters the evil eye. It shouldn't be intimidating to exercise the franchise.
10 feet from the polling place door I was offered a 'sample ballot' card w/headliner Barack Obama. No, thanks very much, although very easy for me to follow and highly illegal, I'll pass. Walk into polling place, must get better, correct? NO! In the polling room was asked again by short woman, "Are you voting?" "Why yes, yes, I am. Thanks for asking." She pulls the SAME SAMPLE BALLOT out of her pocket and says, "I can't give this to you in here." Really? Did you see the turnip truck just drive by too? Next, asked for my ID. Nope, sure don't have that, but take a look at this voter registration card - directed to next table. On that table what do you think before my tiny eyes doth appear? Yes, you are correct, the same sample ballot card - face up - thus reflecting headliner B.O. with his merry band - Durbin, Gutierrez, Delgado, Soto, Berrios. Lest I forget to mention, short woman who graciously offered sample ballot was on her cell phone reporting the numbers voted. If I'm not mistaken, also illegal.
Was voter 208 at about 6:45pm and hardly anyone left after me.
PS - I had to return to the ballot table after processing my ballot b/c the I was not asked to sign the voting form prior to taking my ballot. Another horrendous experience voting in Chicago!