-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/03/16/evans-sidelined/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
No doubts in my mind. This is a minor setback.
As a Republican, I would like to see him voted out of office by a good Republican cut from the Tom Railsback cloth. It is hard to say if any of the Republican candidates running for this office are up to the task.
A couple questions for discussion: do we forego Evans' seniority, regardless of health, for a political novice?
Another twist, is there some sort of Bill/Dan Lipinski thing going on where the Evans crew slates a handpicked successor after the Primary to succeed Lane?
The district is solidly democratic and it is highly unlikely based on the map that a Republican can win, no matter who the Democrat is.
I can recall one or two people on there that have missed a great deal of votes and their is perfectly fine.
I talked to him briefly and also noted his speech was more difficult to follow than I had remembered from a visit in May in DC.
I don't always agree with Lane but I deeply respect that man and he has been a very strong supporter for education and library issues. I hope this is only a temporary setback.
PD is a progressive disease with no cure at this time. There are drugs that help with the symptoms and now some brain surgery procedures that help hold the progress in abeyance. Sadly, not all PD patients are good candidates.
I have a couple who are dear friends of mine. The husband has had PD since his 40's. He is going to have a second surgery for the other side of his brain this month so I am very familiar with the disease and its affects on people.
It is unfortunate that he felt he had to mislead voters in his last election that his health was not deteriorating. He is unlikely to ever be 100%. A cursory look at the photos will show a steady decline in his health over the years. He has had a good career and served the public well.
But he did mislead voters. Most of his 04 adds did not even show recent video of him. He knew his health was visibly deteriorating and is waiting for his hand picked replacment. Those within the community know he has picked a replacement who was supposedly attending U of I law school to prepare. It is a tough issue, but he should have stepped aside if he knew he couldn't do the job, rather then go a term unable to put the votes in for his constitents. This could pose a problem for the replacement, that his predessor was willing to let the voters work undone while he was preparing.
I say this because it is that same personality along with incredible intelligence that have made him, and continue to make him, a great Congressman for the District and the country.
Right now especially it is important that we have strong Democrats in office and I think he understands that and that is a big part of why he has not yet stepped down. In the upcoming election it is vairly obviose that many new Democrats will be elected in the backlash against the current administration. Because of this there will be a lot of young Congressmen, and they will need leadership. Who better to give that than a man who has served 24 years in Congress. I have a feeling that after this next term he may retire, but he is definitally needed this term.
If you are an elected public official unable to do your best due to a mitigating factor such as health or personal problems, do not fail your constituents by hanging on. Public officials do not own their office. These are not lifetime appointments. There is life after politics.
Retire gracefully, don't be carried out.
Sorry, just tellin' it like it is.