<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CapitolFax.com - Latest Comments in Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/gallup_has_illinois_solidly_8220blue8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:29:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Voters who follow politicians vote Blue.  The voters who follow policies and economics will vote Red.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then Rod was elected twice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blind Faith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;=============&lt;br&gt;What worries me is that people keep saying this, keep warning that some bend on each side is required or all will lose, but nothing is changing...at all.&lt;br&gt;=============&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd argue that people are looking at this from the wrong perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These numbers reflect the fact that the Illinois GOP has not given the electorate (meaning that part of the electorate that will even listen to them) a whole lot to like in the last few elections, crowded by the fiscally conservative image of the Speaker's Democratic Party (well sold to the public, but check the actual numbers), and the grossly, not to say criminally overfunded telegenics of Blagojevich.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But things are so bad today in Springfield and across Illinois that voters just might be willing to take another look.  A unified campaign behind a common set of policies aimed at sound fiscal government, aimed at capturing votes in the Center, might make deep inroads into these numbers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, that could be quite a hurdle in the current Illinois GOP.  Many in the Conservative wing find greater power in destruction rather than construction, and will follow their need for self-importance right over the electoral cliff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What worries me is that people keep saying this, keep warning that some bend on each side is required or all will lose, but nothing is changing .  .  .  at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bubs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;===============&lt;br&gt;Has anyone else had the sense for weeks now that Proft is only in this to whine about Dillard?&lt;br&gt;===============&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No.  I'm pretty certain that he's in it to win--unless there's someone coming up from behind that we don't know about yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, Crain's is probably right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VanillaMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More data needs to be provided.  I'd like to see it broken down more - a specific number for Lean Democratic and Lean Republican.  Also would nice to see trends over the next several months as we lead up to the primary.  And it wouldn't hurt to show how the President's approval ratting in the states they select.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Red</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well John, If you want to see Poll Numbers from July 2009, I suggest you pay for them...... Call your buddy Rod McCollugh, I'm sure he's not too busy.......&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">I'm Just Saying</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VM,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, more correctly, as a reader digesting your comments, I took away that "11 of 12 million IL voters living north of I-80 and east of I-39" are, on balance, a little left of "liberal Democratic", being only washed out by the smidgen of 1 million downstate voters who are, on balance, more conservative, making IL a "liberal Democratic state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which I find a tad bit simplistic, even if the overall trend is toward the left.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Six Degrees of Separation</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have what, 6 months to the primary?? We don't need to press the panic button on not having the one single candidate BEFORE petitions start to be circulating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hell, what is the primary for if not for the party to figure out its nominee? You know, if its such an issue, stop having primaries that have to be paid for by taxpayers who aren't part of either party and could care less about the internecine squabbling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Bambenek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mmm this just begs a lede a like: "Illinois blue up!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ghost</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;You didnâ€™t explicity state it, but you inferred it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, you assumed what I didn't write. I believe that voters are capable of making their own decisions, regardless where they live. I believe that just because a political party wins an election, they didn't win &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; the votes. Chicagoland isn't Cuba.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, I won't infer what I don't believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VanillaMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;--The map is pretty clear, the gop establishment from moderates like lahood that change teams, and conservatives like hastert that betrayed the party have got to go.--&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting strategy. How does that get one to a winning plurality?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wordslinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:31:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Democratic party discipline is so lax that I am thoroughly confident in party leaders to squander any preexisting gain there might have been. I will be taking nothing for granted in this race.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Westgard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The map is pretty clear, the gop establishment from moderates like lahood that change teams, and conservatives like hastert that betrayed the party have got to go. It sickens me that young ethan with only a dad secured gig in the white house and bereft of  any ideas  is running for congress. If I was a republican in that area I'd tell him to run for state rep, show me that he's not going to be a big spender like his dad or defender of mark foleys and then run.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with merrion, it's an awful field of gop candidates and it's better for the party to  lose again statewide next year than have what we had with hastert in congress which is awful republicans ruining it so that when good ones come along they don't get the time of day from voters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:21:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cicero Dan has obviously undertaken conservatorship of the Blagojevich playbook - slash, burn, ridicule.  Memo to Dan - we are tired of Blagojevich methods.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Can't</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VM,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You didn't explicity state it, but you inferred it.  However, IMHO the northern/NW burbs have been "moderate" for a long time (think John Porter, Mark Kirk, etc.) when the ILGOP was in a more successful mode, it's just that D moderates have made inroads with these same voters, and they are not 100% political polar opposites of the people they replaced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think we are that much in disagreement here, except that there are more "downstate" voters than you gave credit for in your original post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Six Degrees of Separation</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Second, you canâ€™t assume all of NE IL is solid D, just like you canâ€™t assume all downstate is solid R (Madison/St. Clair counties and the college towns).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I repeat - Illinois has been a Democratic state since the northern suburban counties of Illinois went &lt;b&gt;moderate&lt;/b&gt;, tipping the state towards the biggest voter block, Chicagoland.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't say anything about NE Illinois being politically solid either way. With the majority of voters in NE Illinois, and the suburbs no longer voting majority conservative, NE Illinois, along with it's majority, is making Illinois trend Democrat and liberal. See? Nothing about NE Illinois being solid Democrat. Didn't write that, did I?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VanillaMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;===  Several little-known conservatives are preparing to challenge him, and almost every one of them is making a huge deal out of the fact that Mr. Kirk was one of only eight GOP House members to vote in favor of President Obamaâ€™s proposed cap-and-trade carbon tax. ===&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Expect them to make much more of the fact that Kirk has been endorsed in the past by The Sierra Club and the National Abortion Rights Action League, and supports tougher gun control laws.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yellow Dog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DemLifer - You think Julie Hamos beats Giannoulias in a primary?? Have you ever seen Hamos work a room? Or, more appropriately, not work a room? Or give a speech?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's the funniest thing I've read all morning. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TTL, III</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. Good pull on gallup. Andy McKenna, you're fired. &lt;br&gt;2. Kirk's district voted for obama 61-38, which means Kirk will face same situation he faced  in district where his messages and vision worked, although Alexi's campaign will probably be more comptenant than dan's was. &lt;br&gt;3. Small time conservatives hitting Kirk isn't a bad thing, it can make him look moderate. &lt;br&gt;4. What does it say about how strong that dem support is that true democrats like jan schakowsky are too afraid to take on kirk?&lt;br&gt;5. Crain's is very pro-Kirk, he's their ideal politician.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best thing Mark Kirk may have going for him in the general election is Alexi Giannoulias.  Kirk will outshine Giannoulias when it comes to the issues and our voters usually get that.  Besides, the treasurer has his baggage and the voters are tiring of questionable backgrounds from both parties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;	Julie Hamos, on the other hand, can stifle Kirk on the issues and gives the Democrats the best chance to retain the seat.  Come on Julie, pack your carpetbag, leave the Tenth District to its citizens and serve your state.  Otherwise, the Democrats may have to kiss that 60 seat majority good bye.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DemLifer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to see poll numbers from July, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Ruberry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;With 11 of the 12 million Illinoians living north of I-80 and east of I-39, Illinois is a liberal Democrat state.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One, it's more like 9 million living north of I-80 and east of I-39, going by 2008 Census county estimates, even if you throw all counties touched by I-80 and I-39 as "in", which they aren't.  Second, you can't assume all of NE IL is solid D, just like you can't assume all downstate is solid R (Madison/St. Clair counties and the college towns).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Six Degrees of Separation</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FDR was president for so long, I deliberately chose Hoover so that the timeline would be between 1928-1932 instead of between 1932-1945.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VanillaMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:45:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gallup has Illinois solidly &amp;#8220;blue&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/08/03/gallup-has-illinois-solidly-blue/#comment-18245266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;--The rest of the state is normal.--&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From simple minds...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wordslinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>