-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/12/22/impeachment-hearings/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Gensen was sitting in his chair doing nothing at 11:48. If you are representing a client, shouldn't you read what is given to you? Scary for the Gov. Was Gensen a c student too?
"Don't steam me, Barbara. Don't steam me!"
Maybe only 5 seconds afterward.
--
Genson should give them his statement on Thursday. The echo will have a nice effect.
He tries to answer again, then his mic switches back on. Gensen makes a passing reference to Sam Adams to the effect of "He keeps shutting off the mic, just in case we are talking"
But of course, in this case we don't only have one complaint...there are several, and you're right, those have more teeth.
That is true, of course. I'll amend the post.
Oy. I'm about to fall asleep.
Because Bedore is beyond reproach and has never been political and has no personal agenda, right?
But for someone who was trying to sell a senate seat, shook down a children's hospital and was selling state jobs, how does it bleeping make sense to focus on FOIA compliance? Sure FamilyCare was bad and blowing off FOIAs is not that happy place, but its kinda like busting a serial rapist who has 10 women chained up in his basement and citing him for building code violations.
I can't believe I had the video minimized for that question. I almost choked on my lunch with that one, LOL
It appears "The Real Bill" is back.
Basically, Ctrl+C from one document, Ctrl+P into the other.
Maybe people donated money because they are concerned citizens who believed that Rod was the best person to lead Illinois in the 21st century.
A large percentage of his contributions from people who are rich enough to give $25K or more
So, Bill, are you suggesting that the Blagojevich administration has been favorable to the rich over the middle class and poor?
I was actually disparaging Canary's gas station/arsonist analogy.
He can argue all he wants. This is just one more "fair trial before a hanging." The end is not in doubt. Which probably explains why I'm so sleepy. lol
Too funny
Thanks,
#11 was posted earlier but it looks like they re-posted the documents so they appear in order. #11 was HFS's response to the documents they promised Thursday. Not sure it includes everthing that was promised.
What I was suggesting is that if people rich enough to contribute $25K or more were making the contributions because they believed "Rod was the best person to lead Illinois," then it's logical to conclude that his policies tend to favor very rich people, often at the expense of the middle class and poor.
Regardless, I would imagine that anyone who will give me a multi-million dollar state contract in exchange for a $25K contribution is definitely the right person to lead me in the 21st century.
It hasn't been forgotten, but it's also under investigation by USA Fitz.
Black must have read your post!
I will admit that it is getting much harder to come up with them lately.
The 'Gensen' list would be interesting. Should make up a huge % of the 8% that think Blago is doing a fine job!
Its good to see that the morale of state employees is holding up well under all of the strain.
Aren't any other Illinois taxpayers annoyed by this? Not that I should be surprised since the first promise from the elected officials was we'd have a special election, then it was a promise of non-stop impeachmentfest with them only taking Christmas and New Year's Day off, then they give themselves a three day weekend and now they take a week off for Christmas?
WHAT A JOKE!
Of course what's another week for the state of Illinois to twist in the wind to this state's failed leaders?
It's not like anyone is going to hold Emil Jones accountable for gumming up the works and protecting his boy Blago and it's not like if they tried to hold him accountable he'd care.
It's not like anyone is going to hold the members of the House accountable for waiting until the governor is arrested before growing the spine to actually impeach our corrupt, incompetent, criminal chief executive and it's not like if anyone tried to they would care.
It's not like any citizens are actually going to organize a protest outside the governor's house or JRT or the Statehouse to actually demand Rod's immediate resignation and better government in general, although who can blame them since all of us know attempting such an action would accomplish nothing since our state politicians don't respect our opinions and removing one bad apple from this generally rotten batch seems to make little difference as the progression from George Ryan to Blago has shown.
Here's hoping Genson has a very holly jolly Christmas at the Executive Mansion and stays nice and toasty thanks to that $720,000 taxpayer-funded heated driveway.
Come January 14th you can start complaining that there's a big holdup. I figure the House will wrap things up by the 15th or so.
Swift justice...maybe you should be running the Committee?
Really, what a moron to try to get away with something like that here. Good riddance to idiotic trash.
Oh, and by the way, Merry Christmas to all!!!
lol
But I really don't buy into the idea that Emil being an obstructionist is a legitimate excuse for the House throwing up their hands and not doing anything impeachment-wise until he's out of there because Emil wouldn't allow it to go ahead in the Senate. Public pressure and shaming Emil got the contractor contribution ban through and it might have worked for impeachment as well. But even if it hadn't worked I'd rather the House acted and forced Emil to show his hand rather than just drag their feet to accomodate him and let him set this state's timetable for getting rid of Blagojevich.
That's just my opinion.
Even if Blago is for once on his best behavior and merely pretends for an hour or so as if nothing is amiss in his world or in state government, the sight of having him wield that gavel is going to look bad... really bad. It will make the Senators look bad, which cannot help heal the rift between the two chambers.
...perhaps Genson's client will need to be reminded of his virility, it being of mythologic proportions and all...
Loss of support of the Legislature, loss of support of the public doesn't phase Blag....but because of his pride and narcissism ridicule is the silver bullet.
Jay Leno........please save us!!!!!!!
Bill, that's old school. You seem to be handling the cognitive dissonance better.
Bill Clinton's impeachment hearings began 19 November 1998 with Ken Starr as the main witness. THIRTY ONE days later, on 19 December, the House approved two articles of impeachment. Senate proceedings began on 14 January 1999. Just THIRTY days later, on 12 February, the Senate voted to acquit Clinton.
But with Clinton there was no real hurry to get him out of office. The Republicans KNEW going into it they didn't have enough votes to convict so they just wanted to stretch out the proceedings, try to milk it for what they could politically and try to effectively cripple the rest of Clinton's presidency.
Here the Democrats know they have the votes (the speaker wouldn't have started it otherwise and the new senate president will keep his word to the speaker) and as far as they're concerned the sooner this governor is O U T out, the better! They'll only drag out the process long enough to make it look ok, i.e., minimum due process.
I expect the Illinois house will take about a month and then the Illinois Senate one more month, just like when the Republicans played out their charade with Clinton. Of course Clinton maintained a 70% popularity rating, had the house Democrats standing behind him immediately after he was impeached and didn’t lose a single Democratic senator. Rod has a 7% popularity rating and NO friends in either party in either house of the General Assembly. He has very little chance that any court will overturn his impeachment and conviction on appeal. In Federal impeachment trials there is no appeal.