-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/26/jack-ryans-return/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
There was a herd of elephants with high rises in the back ground with the phrase: "It's hard to be right in Chicago."
I thooght it was ingenious marketing!
That's an odd statement from someone who worked in the White House for Bubba.
At least someone in the GOP is trying to recruit Chicago Republicans, rather than just whine about Chicago Democrats.
Short aside: I live in Cook County. I pulled a GOP ballot in last year's primary. I have yet to receive a piece of mail from any GOP candidate or organization -- national, state or local.
That's not trying very hard.
Right. She's an incumbent in a low-profile position in Cook County with a "D" next to her name. That's not trust, that's sheep mentality.
Figuratively, she's in for a very rough ride. Accepting cash gifts from subordinates, under any circumstances, is reprehensible.
Literally, she'll continue to be chauffered around town by her bodyguard, who's on the county payroll as an "analyst".
Like Groucho, I would never join an organization that would have someone like me as a member.
My point was, if you're trying to build a state, county or local political organization, you should at least canvass or contact those that have pulled a primary ballot. That seems very basic.
Really? When? By whom? And no, the Clinton pardon doesn't count.
The dirty laundry from his personal life always looked like it got a lot more traction then it deserved.
Dorothy Brown didn't win mayor now she is going for CC Pres., ......sigh....ok, whatever... what will she run for next after that loss?
2)Reynolds was hired by the Rev. Jackson, not Cong. Jackson (who beat Reynolds, you may recall)
3) if you can find a credible link from Reynolds to Obama, feel free to add it. what you've provided fails rather miserably.
weird yes, creepy? Jack Ryan left the contest because he didn't want to be a distraction to the party. He had nothing to do with the choice of Keyes - the party was not forced to choose Keyes either. The issues are not related.
I don't know alot about Ryan's politics but he had a nasty divorce which was brought out into the public (by whom? - some wonder) to scandalize him (it worked).
I'm sure you ain't got anything in your closet/mind that would be embarassing.
That said, "Annoy the Liberal Media, Proft/Martin in 2010".
I interviewed Jack Ryan for a radio show and I found him quite appealing on a personal level. If the guy wants to participate in politics as an activist that's cool. If he wants to run again he's got to rehabilitate his image. But Marion Berry came back from snorting cocaine off a prostitute, so voters do forgive transgressions under the right circumstances.
Shouldn't you have just said:
BACK!
We'd all know immediately who you meant.
LOL
this isn't good because the more black candidates (e.g., Davis) the more the black vote gets split. Todd can forget about getting votes from white cook county.
So, hispanics are the "it" group that can make or break him, or anyone else for that matter. I guess he could promise patronage jobs in exchange for hispanic support and/or work out some other deal.
2 John all you have to do is read my post where I mention Jr smoked Reynolds in his comeback attempt. Dont be so defenseive Rich wanted to tweak the GOP about Ryan but the Dems have a lot more actual criminals/ sex fiends hanging around. Mostly because more get elected. i would guess that most GOP would welcome scooter back. Much like the Clintons still like a thieving criminal named Sandy Berger.
Jack Ryan asked his WIFE to try something a little different. So what---that was hardly a crime. she said no, and they didn't do it.
I recall Jim Edgar being furious that JacK Ryan had withheld some of his past indisrections from the party prior to agreeing to run for the U.S. Senate. Jim Edgar is from the 1950s; it was no of is business or the GOP's business or the Tribune's and whatever tv station demanded to have his sealed divorce records unsealed.
Republicans and their moral high card play is so tired and stupid. They need to get off of that because it never worked and STILL isn't working for them.
I think he can return in a very safe Republican district. In time his aborted Senate run would then be overshadowed by his newer activities.
I was told at the time by a first-hand witness that in a meeting with then State Chairman Judy Baar Topinka at State HQ in Chicago, Jack was asked if there was anything in his past that could embarass himself or the GOP in the campaign. He affirmatively denied that there was anything. Apparently, Jack thought that his wife's affidavit about the sex club stuff was dead and buried forever in a sealed court file, so he withheld from mentioning that little item. The the Tribune went to work on unsealing the court file, and found the affidavit. A media explosion resulted.
I was told that Topinka in particular was furious, believing she had been lied to by Ryan.
More importantly, party leadership can never allow potential candidates to believe that they can fudge on that crucial question, ever, so Ryan paid the price, as the Illinois GOP would not stand by him.
To those who say it was all Topinka "stabbing" Ryan, I can recall a summer day in 2004, driving in my car at the corner of Cumberland Ave. and Irving Park Road when WBBM reported that the entire Republican Congressional delegation, including Speaker Hastert, had jointly called on Jack Ryan to withdraw as the Senate candidate.
Hearing that, I knew JACK! was finished.
Danny Davis
Tom Dart
Jim Houlihan
Terry O’Brien
Toni Preckwinkle
Todd Stroger
Larry Suffredin
This is beginning to look like the 5th CD primary. I think the edge goes to Tom Dart because of the general press he's gotten for his good deeds. (I think that is how Quigley won. The campaign itself was a wash/waste. People voted for the candidate they knew had been doing good deeds for a long time.)
January 21, 2009
BY MICHAEL SNEED
Scoopsville: Sneed is told former U.S. Rep. Mel Reynolds, who served time in a federal prison for sexual misconduct with an underage campaign worker and tax evasion, was spotted in a celeb section near the inaugural stage getting his picture taken with actress Halle Berry!
Thats an interesting blurb Mel Reynolds in DC at the inauguration next to the stage in the vip section yeah he is on bad terms with the dems they must be embarresed of him.
I don't think Brown will get as many votes as Preckwinkle, and Preckwinkle has a much better chance against Todd than Brown. Brown will be a spoiler anyhow.
Go Sox!
yes, and dart is in easier position, through his current office, to attract a lot of press. he can attack stroger, while highlighting his sheriff work, and the media will cover whatever he says. this wouldn't be the case for houlihan, suffredin, and o'brien.
Hey Captain America, that is a great ad and very appropriate. Personally, every time I think of young Republicans I have to make a run to the washroom. Great marketing.
the more the merrier is right because whomever wins the primary will win the general election because the republicans have no serious contenders. this is a wide open race.
So character, as in lying to the face of the State Chariman on a key question, with catastrophic results, doesn't matter? It's all about glitz and money?
Carl, Marion was caught on hidden camera smoking crack with a former girlfriend who was in trouble and set him up for a sting by the FBI.
I'm not sure who you're thinking of, but I'm guessing heavy-metal rocker, Wall Street broker or Ivy League legacy....
Carl, I'm
I'm a Dem but it will take an Independent or Republican to clean up the County. IMO no Democrat, regardless of good intentions, will be able to cut all the ties to patronage waste.
In child custody cases things get mean. The files were sealed, until David Axelrod and the tribune went to sue to get them unsealed and, surprise, got the statement back in public domain.
Jeri was asked if she made the statement in court. She said yes. However, it is important to realize that she never repeated the statement outside of court - -to the public, either in the Tribune or elsewhere. Did Jack suggest they go to a sex club? Nobody knows. Did he go separately to any sex club any time? No information.
If Jeri had repeated it in public it would have 10 affected the kids and 2) possibly have been a slander. She kept mum.
Meanwhile the Thompson/Edgar/Topinka/Kjellander cabal told Jack that he would not get funding. These idjuts saw a threat to their wing of the party by a conservative, and the orderly succession to George Ryan would be in trouble. They did not want another Peter Fitzgerald.
Keyes was a sure loser, so they approved him. He didn't demand much funding because he was not running for Senator from Illinois. He was running for national reputations and future considerations -- which included cash contributions from conservative fools and the mailing list. He refused to engage on any Illinois issues. I'll say this for him, he is a heckuva good public sermonizer. He would turn any issue into a sermon.
The Republicans underestimated the Obama potential.
Jack Ryan has been maligned enough without any tangible proofs.
Among the hundreds of pages of documents released was a legal filing dated June 9, 2000, in which Jeri Ryan said she knew her marriage was over by the spring of 1998. She went on to contend that her then-husband--whom she repeatedly refers to as "respondent" in the filing--surprised her with trips to the cities but didn't tell her he planned to bring her to sex clubs while there.
"They were long weekends, supposed `romantic' getaways," Jeri Ryan said in the filing. "The clubs in New York and Paris were explicit sex clubs. Respondent had done research. Respondent took me to two clubs in New York during the day. One club I refused to go in. It had mattresses in cubicles. The other club he insisted I go to."
I think the comparrison to the 5th CD race is apt -- but it is easy in hindsight to think that Quigley had it sewn up from the beginning. Early on I had numerous people telling me that Fritchey had a lock on it, other told me that no one could beat O'Connor, and others said that Feigenholtz, as the only serious woman, would win easily. Yet Quigley won it, and has brought his independent streak with him. I think that the CCBP race could be just as unpredicitable and, hopefully, will have an equally positive result.
Ryan is OK because he isn't as bad as other guys still playing politics?
Yuk!
Jack Ryan wants to be elected to something and that has been the situation for years. He has the looks, the cash, and the presentation skills to run for office, and he also has executive experience to probably do a good job. Big deal!
There are millions of Illinoisans. We don't need this guy in office.
Find someone else.
Respondent wanted me to have sex with him there with another couple watching. I refused," Jeri Ryan continued. "Respondent asked me to perform a sexual activity upon him and he specifically asked other people to watch. I was very upset.
"We left the club and respondent apologized, said that I was right and he would never insist that I go to a club again. He promised it was out of his system."
But later, Jeri Ryan said, Jack Ryan took her to Paris where he again took her to a sex club without first telling her where they were going.
"I told him I thought it was out of his system. I told him he had promised me we would never go. People were having sex everywhere. I cried. I was physically ill. Respondent became very upset with me and said it was not a `turn-on' for me to cry. I could not get over the incident and my loss of any attraction to him as a result. Respondent knew this was a serious problem. I told him I did not know if we could work it out."
If the list of candidates for CC pres stays long, we will be facing another accusation-slinging mess.
If one, but only one, Hispanic candidate joins the group that could make a big difference. I'm still convinced that is how Anita Alvarez won. Which is not to say is not qualified. I'm just saying when you are the ONLY person from a big voting block (and she had two Onlys), it makes a difference. Terry O'Brien has counted on that in his MWRD races
VM is right - there are plenty of good people who can represent the state either in Springfield or in Washington. Anyone who wants to run should. Let the hammer (or Roeser) fall where it may
Jack Ryan did not force jeri to anything that she did not want to do. was his insistence in participating in such activities a bit much? yes. a bit insensitive, particulary after she made it clear that she was not interested? yes.
as a voter and female, I STILL would have voted for Jack Ryan provided he made the case as to why he would have the better senator.
Once again. Jeri did not ever repeat in public what she said in camera. Child custody cases are a bitter, bitter things. Notice that no dates are given. No cross examination was done.
party of one quotes only from the transcript which Mrs Ryan thought was to be sealed.
Sorry, that does not convince me that the actions ever took place that she describes.
Unfortunately, buying ink by the barrel does not mean printing the truth. The Tribune has the defense of indicating that this came from the sealed record. They were also aware that for Jack to fight the press he would have to call Jeri out and affect the relationship with his kids, which had been settled.
I am reminded of Paul Newman's role in "Absence of Malice."
Reagan (is that your name? If not, t's an awfully presumptuous handle):
If you think there needs to be a diabolical conspiracy for the media to pursue a story involving sex clubs, a beautiful blond actress, and a handsome, young GOP millionaire running for Senate, you haven't been paying attention for quite some time.
not everything is black or white all of the time. in this instance I see shades of gray. confines of a marriage, consenting adults and something fairly common (whether society wants to admit it or not).
no, my standards are not low at all. just being fair and reasonable, that's all; I can understand why you would have difficulty with such concepts.
Those who blame the winner because the winner came to the race with his A game aren't living in the real world. The Obama team was just doing their job.
They were all grown-ups involved in a political campaign -- not kindergarten kids living in a world where we all play nice regardless.
WARNING
TJ is NOT Truthful James
One of my big problems with Jack! is that it is quite a difference from the conservative image he built in the primary. I am so sick of these hypocrites. And for whatever reasons the GOP seems to have more than they know what to do with these days. So, I say good riddance to Jack!
" was recently in a bar/restaurant, Stanleys in Lincoln Park and noted a very clever poster posted in the bathroom ...."
How about Ensign and Sanford too
Talk about the trifecta
Have a GREEEEEEEAT Confab
Seriously, what is wrong with him being there. May I remind everyone that in the US Senate there sits a man that was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, and a man that killed a mistress. So why is a private citizen criticized when he did something far less immoral than the other wackos in the senate?
Oh, those other people are democrats... oh yeah... they must be good people. Oh yeah, billionaires supposedly fighting for the working man... yeah, good people.
They are all out to get you.
Damn liberal media refusing to ignore a story about an actress and sex clubs. How biased!
Don't you get it. It did not happen. Jack kept quiet for the benefit of the kids.
Is Jack Ryan going to announce that he's running? If so, for which office?
What if he decides to run for Gov? Proft v. Ryan would be interesting--an understatement, I'm sure--for a variety of reasons. E.g., what could/couldn't Proft say IF he signed a non-disclosure K when he worked for the Campaign? Will they go at it mano-a-mano, or will Proft step aside and "endorse" Ryan? The latter would be very interesting.
If Ryan decides to run for Senate (or even Gov or Kirk's seat), will the Voters he had before jump on board? The allegations were one thing; the release of the papers and some of it's contents were another.
Also, who leaked the papers? MuCulloch had once made a statement about that, but it wasn't out there for too long. Who had access to them before they were redacted and who had access to them after they were, but prior to release? Therefore, who still might have them?
Bottom line: who'll be willing to take the risk and why?
Interesting.
Look, jeri Ryan has/had some serious issues. She started crying? Ok jeri…whatever.
--------------------
Wow. Sensitive. Next we're going to hear a "Sheesh" after the "whatever..."
Must be the "PR person" that was used for Jack's Bio online. You know, the one where it clearly states that Jeri had an extramarital affair with Brandon for everyone who can read to see.
And everyone seems to be getting along so nicely.
Sheesh...whatEVER!
Uh, that's right. I've been T.J. here at least three years, never TJ or Truthful James or anything else.
Jack was a rich guy who didn't need the old crowd. Even if he lost to Obama, he could have remained a big name on the scene and possibly been a contender for Gov in 2008. Jack was more popular than Topinka and that just wouldn't do.
The idea of Topinka being outraged over "lying" is absurd. She's the most dishonest person out there for one thing.
Besides, if the story is Jack said nothing in the file would "embarrass the party" it's hard to see how that's a lie. The IL GOP is beyond embarrassment.
Lastly, who cares what the guy did with his own wife at the time? The IL GOP backs lots of candidates who don't like girls at all. Maybe that's what they really hated about Jack.
Will County Woman, Bubs, Truthy James and everyone else who continues to whine about the Trib going to court to get the divorce papers unsealed... here are the facts:
- During the divorce, neither Jeri Ryan nor Jack Ryan pushed to have the documents sealed. Under state law divorce papers are public records though exceptions are occasionally made.
- Well after the divorce was finalized but just ahead of his Senate run Jack Ryan went back to court to request that the documents be sealed. His now-ex-wife agreed.
As Truthful James indicates, they ostensibly were taking this action for the children though the timing seems suspect (if it was for the kids why not do it during or just after the divorce proceedings? why wait so long ... until just before announcing a Senate candidacy?)
- During the GOP primary for Senate, a member of Gen. John Borling's campaign staff went to the press with what he claimed was a pre-sealed copy of the Ryan divorce papers which he claimed held explosive and damaging information.
- To each of their credits, Borling fired that guy and though the news outlets reported on the scene the guy made about the documents they did not report on the content since that particular set of documents was not obtained legally.
- But, the Trib did soon go to court to get the once-public documents made public again.
The judge agreed, the Trib reported on the content, Jack dropped out, and the rest is Keyesian history.
....Bottom line: it's hardly the Trib's fault that a primary opponent's campaign staff went after Jack Ryan with those divorce papers.
And yes, the Obama campaign did encourage the media to look into the matter further but it was the Borling campaign (against the General's wishes) that first made the accusations public.
As we can see in the recent example of the Lake County GOP's FEC filing against Sen. Michael Bond that these types of "work the refs" moves are commonplace in campaigns, whether Jack Ryan fans (or Mark Kirk fans) like it or not.
--
....And GOP guy, you need to remove your tinfoil hat. ;)
...I believe what you just did in your comment is also known as "criticizing" -- ie, it's not like any of their opponents ever let them forget those things.
And it was the Republicans that criticized their candidate Jack Ryan (he was no longer "private citizen" Jack Ryan but instead "Senate candidate" Jack Ryan). He lost fairly significant support from GOP voters and it led to him dropping out.
Democrats didn't support him to begin with, but after the lurid details came out they mostly shrugged it off. >Polling from that time indicated that 27% of Republican voters thought worse of Ryan after the sex club info came to light, whereas only 13% of Dems thought worse of him.
But because that operative from 2002 had to sign a non-disclosure agreement, he couldn't be the one to go public in 2004, despite the fact he had a personal ax to grind against Jack by then, over money I think.
So that operative passed along the info to McCulloch, and he was the guy who went public in the 2004 race for Senate. This is all being done don't forget within the war room of the IL GOP, where Topinka is then Chairman. If you recall, McCulloch said there were things in the file that it eventually turned out weren't even in there. The actual file wasn't damaging enough to destroy Jack. They had to make some stuff up. Recall for example Topinka going around saying Jack had forced his wife to have sex against her will, i.e. rape. It just wasn't true. There was no such allegation even.
It's not clear whether McCulloch even saw the file, or whether he just went on what the other operative told him orally. Or maybe both knew the big stuff was being fabricated. Who knows. We do know McCulloch was later convicted in DuPage on an unrelated election law fraud charge.
This is all what I've heard from sources I consider credible.
Bottom line, it's a travesty what Jack's own party did to him, or at least what a few of the old faces did (Topinka, Edgar, etc.). Talk about your circular firing squads!
To each of their credits, Borling fired that guy and though the news outlets reported on the scene the guy made about the documents they did not report on the content since that particular set of documents was not obtained legally.
================
Yes. You'd think that if the Ds had faxed it to McCulloch, they simply would have, well...faxed it without worrying about "appearances".
Everyone always seems to conveniently forget that all of this didn't start with the Tribune.
It began with the fax.
If you recall, McCulloch said there were things in the file that it eventually turned out weren’t even in there. The actual file wasn’t damaging enough to destroy Jack. They had to make some stuff up. Recall for example Topinka going around saying Jack had forced his wife to have sex against her will, i.e. rape. It just wasn’t true. There was no such allegation even.
================
Except there were "six paragraphs (or was it pages?) that the Judge didn't release because Jack Ryan's attorney talked him out of it, plus the stuff that had already been redacted.
Tough spin.