<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CapitolFax.com - Latest Comments in Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_night_videos/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:13:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Smitty, SB1912 has the funds sweeps particulars.  In light of the Burr Oak problem, it is interesting to note that the GA is sweeping $658,000 from the Cemetery Consumer Protection Fund.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">332bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:13:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dunns shouldn't have been cut.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">No</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they wait until January to work on revenue, does this mean that they will not need any Republican votes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oakparker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bobs Yer, everybody will know if they have a primary opponent or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wordslinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just don't understand how its more politically acceptable to have the next round of budget fighting right before the primary.  What's going to change?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bobs yer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Followup - many non GRF budgets are contained in HB 2206.  For example, the Fire Marshal.  As of midnight, it had not been signed, and no news notices about it being signed.  Anyone else have any news?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Smitty Irving</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This statement is made without access to Public Acts on &lt;a href="http://ilga.gov" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ilga.gov"&gt;ilga.gov&lt;/a&gt;, just access to amendments that "delete and replace," but it seems Public Acts 96-0044 and 96-0045 transfer identical amounts from special funds to GRF.  Anyone else read this?  Anyone access to the Public Acts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Smitty Irving</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dunns should be cut.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You'll be doing it all again, sooner rather than later.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wordslinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dunns got cut&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry, one more thing:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should the Union conduct a poll with its members to decide which of the cuts to negotiate or should it act like parents and do what it thinks is right for us whether we like it or not? I want to see what voice the rank and file members have in all of this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stoned Prophet</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At around 2:41 of the second video, Quinn says how layoffs can be negotiated with AFSCME et al. He said that furlough days and no contractual pay raises can prevent layoffs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the dated words of Linda Richman: &lt;br&gt;Talk amongst yourselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stoned Prophet</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard  Martin Scorsese Miller. That is all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Budget bills were just signed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;G-Rod responds "Why didn't I ever get multi billion dollar lump sum lines appropriated directly to my office?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;melissahahn Quinn just signed the budget bill that will allow payroll, so state workers will get hard copy checks tomorrow (Thursday).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous Coward</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;President Cullerton is one of the few true leaders to emerge from this crummy session.  I hope his steady, practical, democratic-with-a-small-d style catches on in Springfield.  And he's got a good bunch behind him in his caucus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late Night Videos</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/15/late-night-videos/#comment-18240276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry - Rich added a new post:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;melissahahn: Gov. Quinn says he'll sign the budget bills as soon as he gets them (good news). Then it'll be time to decide layoffs (bad news).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous Coward</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>