-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/01/30/madigan-introduces-february-primary-bill/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Jones needs to support Madigan now and then. They are supposed to be on the same team - or are on the same team to voters. It is sad that Obama's candidacy can't even bridge these fighting politicians.
Yes, the primaries are too distant from the general election. Yes, the 2008 election is too long. But Illinois can't change that. Instead it must work within the Democratic Party's schedule. As a major Democratic state offering TWO presidential candidates, we should be heard in 2008. I just wish we didn't have all this corruption news sprouting up at the same time as the primary season. I shudder to think what we will be reading in the papers around February 2008.
As to whether we should change a primary date to help a candidate - well, yes we should! Obama and Clinton are our senators, and we should be proud. Move the dates, play with the date, do whatever is needed to get one of our citizens in the White House. Chicago has reasons to be aggressive on this.
That is the problem, so many small states have moved there primary dates back in order to increase their influence beyond what they should have their population. While I want Illinois to have a say that actual matters in the primaries, I think that people are over looking the effect that might have local races. By effectively lessing the length of the primary season, this law might benefit incumbents and well know candidates at the expense of less well known candidates who will now have less time to make for the difference in name recognition.
I don't care whether two of the whitest states in the country keep their "first" status or not, but for the love of all that is holy move it all back to June at the earliest.
Besides, that'll give both parties more time to discuss the nuances of their respective positions as the candidates for nomination debate the subtleties of their respective proposals.
--
Muon, I disagree with splitting the presidential nomination primary from the others. Waste of time, money and space (as polling places need to be found for yet another voting event).
--
And appoint state and local judges, enough of this electing people whose entire raison d'etre is supposed to be impartiality.
In addition, while the campaign season for statewides will be extended because of the nature of the campaigns and the offices involved, it still will generally shorten the Primary season and give an advantage to a certain current statewide officeholder with good name recognition who might look to move up to governor in 2010.