-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/01/08/mckenna-ilgop-try-to-take-advantage/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Again, spare us all the pompous self rightous chest pounding bull #$#^
train111
So it Ryan's fault... Governor is that you?
Secondly, Patt Quinn from what I have seen is a reformer and does march to his own drummer. How many republican's could be quoted talking about George Ryan and how great a guy he was well after everyone knew the man was corrupt.
I dont think a case can be made that Quinn is a "Blagojevich Lackey". So what, he said some things about Blago during the 06 election.
The republicans need to realize that they have to have a plan to fix things. Andy McKenna needs to realize that the Democratic party is destroying themselves, there is no need for Repub's to jump in and help. Democrats can do bad all by themselves.
As a republican, it is frustrating to watch the party flail away with little or no result. Get a plan together and promote the party, dont just stand around and tell me how bad the other guy is!
I'm not the gov, nor am I blaming Ryan, but to me the whole McKenna memo is the pinnacle of hypocrisy given that the IL GOP's hands are as dirty in all this as the Dems, yet they want us all to believe that somehow they are untainted and untouched. What was the old George Wallace line about the Dems and Reps--"Not a plug nickel's difference between them" In Illinois, that sure hits the nail on the head!!
train111
What Andy and Friends are doing now is what they should have been doing since 2003. While I find them in a similar situation as they claim Pat Quinn is in, we must as Illinoians allow some kind of opposition to form to keep the ruling party in check.
Let's not allow our partisan knee-jerk reaction to this blind us from the reality that this is how it is supposed to be - lame as it is.
And right now, lame is better than what we've got.
Downhere thinks you are a dem. LOL
I too, was prepared to take issue with your first post...but thanks for expounding on it in your second post. Unfortunately, your "Not a plug nickels difference..." quote is probably right on the mark.
Pat Quinn will make a great governor - there is no doubt in my mind he is as honest and strong today as he was 25 years ago.
Doug Dobmeyer
With the Illinois Combine ready to give Blago control of another $35 billion for their unfunded capital plan just months ago - I can hardly believe McKenna had the nerve to put pen to paper! and hum.......cannot remember a word from McKenna "the reformer" about that!
Well that's not what you said, you said basically that Ryan begat Blago and without Ryan there would have been no Blago... You were blaming Ryan, just like our governor did and does (I suspect that might even be his criminal defense).
At the end of the day the Democratic party had the option to step away from him. Not to the extent that lets say Stevenson did from the LaRouce folks, but they had the opportunity to step away in 2006. They didn't, and I look forward to seeing the Illinois democratic party try and paint whomever runs for anything with the Rod brush but it isn't going to work.
-- Speaking at Will
Basically 2 years ago Blago managed to convince the Illinois electorate that Judy was Mrs. Ryan for all intensive purposes. We know that wasn't the case but he did it and people fell for it all the same.
Also for what it is worth at least under Ryan we were able to pass budgets and pay health care providers. Also the state auditor general wasn't issuing audits every couple of months showing how his administration was run worse than a high school German club.
Like or not Quinn decided to defend the Governor in 2006 and he should be held accountable for that action. No free pass on that, sorry.
Andy McKenna is a party chair, not an elected official. He should be making hay out of all of this, the party should as well. That's what parties are supposed to do.
http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/Speci...
Lot of blame to go around here, including the voters who elected him the second time.
But, he's one million times the reformer and leader McKenna is.
McKenna and his staff have been flailing around post-the latest November election disaster, trying to look productive. It's embarrassing.
Andy McKenna is the single worst person in the entire universe who should be throwing mud at the Democrats. Okay, maybe after George Ryan.
McKenna's 4 years as party chairman is marked by nothing EXCEPT rigged internal elections, broken promises, lies, state conventions turned into jokes, division, destruction, hypocrisy gone wild, and the loss of nearly every election worth losing.
The IL GOP simply can't advance with McKenna around. His handlers used up all his credibility. Time for them to find a new stooge.
Only the IL GOP could squander the opportunity handed them on this Blago mess. It's already happened.
The Dems are moving forward and cleaning house, the IL GOP still spins its wheels and can't even get rid of its most incompetent players.
-- If you can find me 2 people out of 100 who are even remotely aware (or care) about the ultimate inside baseball you are complaining about I'll buy you lunch. It's great fodder for the far right who also think the 'man' is out to get them, but other than that who really cares about how we elect state central committeemen?
-- Niles Township
Show me where Andy McKenna says
the governor was “a person who’s honest and one of integrity†and that “I have confidence the governor does the right thing all the time.â€
Pat Quinn did, bottom line and if you think that will not or should not be used against him...
Of course the GOP is going to take shots at Pat Quinn right now, it is what political parties do.
When I was a student Radical in the 60s and a kid showed up at a political meeting, organizers would latch on to a potential recruit with some zeal.
Maybe McKenna should worry less about a special election and instead issue an invitation to folks-of-the street in the Illinois to call their local GOP organization and help drive the rascals out come next election.
Don't need to convert them into some kind of cult, but say hey, here's your local party organization... if you don't like what's happening, give us a hand.
PS McKenna was at this function too and I gave him my phone number if he needed geek kinda help. He looked at me like I was from Mars.
I'm sure I set myself up with that, but believe me in 1968 if you went to an SMC meeting at Circle Campus, the organizer hung on trying to get you into the movement.
McKenna's record speaks for itself.
"No one cares, no one is paying attention" - wasn't that how the likes of Fannie Mae and AIG tried to defend themselves for years?
What else you got?
You enact new legistation that calls for one. Per the 17th Amendment, an appointment to the Senate is only temporary until an election is held.
At least out here in the second largest city in the state I can safely say state central committeeman elections and all that sort of stuff never comes up at our party meetings. In the northern part of our county there are some folks who squawk about such things but that's about it.
Why, because that sort of inside baseball BS doesn't move anything forward. Normal people don't vote for nor against the combine nor to they give two shakes about it. Those of us involved and interested in this sort of stuff tend to forget most people can care less who is the chair of either party and what sort of issues people have with that person.
I think I can safely say the number of people in this state who's votes are influenced by who the party chair is could fit in a central Illinois VFW hall with a lot of room to spare.
-- Well it seems some are also energized by complaining about the party chair :-)
You are right. The Democrats did nothing to seperate themselves from Blago until the FEDS stepped in. In fact Madigan and Jones teamed up as his campaign chairs to scare off any potential rival from running against him in the Democratic primary.
Again, you are right that anybody who runs as a Dem in 2010 will be painted as being tied to Blagojevich, just like the adds with JBT doing the polka with George Ryan.
The truth of the matter is (the way I see it anyway)that in reality the GOP really has little wiggle room. There are plenty of GOP operatives knee deep in dealings with Blagojevich, and as a minority in the legislature it seems that they were plenty willing to go buddy buddy with Blagojevich to get some bones handed to them.
Neither side seems to have had the 'testicular virility' to stand up to Rod Blagojevich and his nonsense until he was arrested. Now everybody is jumping on the bandwagon proclaiming how they were always against him from the start.
Heard it all before--please spare me the plolitical games!!
train111
As far as a few republicans voting with Blago on some of the budget issues - Ho Hum. Their in the minority right now and their going to take their shots where they can. I'm sure that a democrat would never play the game that way.
Let's dub McKenna TugBoat Andy.
Not only does he have no credibility becuase of the past, his legislative lunks were in the middle of the pay to play with GRod.
Make em cough up the MOUs Tugboat Andy or get out of the game.
Ok tell me who you would run statewide? We tried Al Salvi and Lauzen and we know how that turned out.
So I am waiting for your list of candidates who could play statewide.
Have to admit there is no real script on how to react when the opposition puts on a three ring circuls like this.
Both labels are in this thing up to their filthy eyeballs.
Yes, plenty of Dems like Mike Madigan and Pat Quinn have lots to be ashamed of and plenty to explain.
But for crying out loud, don't forget GOP boss Bill Cellini (now under indictment) was a big fundraiser for Blago. And one of McKenna's main advisers, and members of his State Central Committee, was a Blago contributor and even served on Blago's transition team! That's Skip Saviano. This is all the tip of the dirty iceberg.
And Andy McKenna is so hostile to reform, he was reportedly ready back in 2004 to run against Senator Peter Fitzgerald in the primary because he was a reformer! We wouldn't be in this mess regarding this senate seat in the first place if McKenna and his henchmen didn't try to undermine the few good Republicans we have had.
My point is, there are no white hats in this thing. They are all (D's and R's) running around looking for cover, being opportunistic, dishonest and hypocritical beyond belief.
Unfortunately, in a state as blue as Illinois, it's not good enough for the Republicans to just break even on the hypocrisy front.
A month or so from now the Dems will have cleaned house of Blago. They'll be moving forward. Meanwhile the IL GOP will be back to square one, getting ready for its next huge embarrassing statewide blowout.
I would say one last thing to OneMan and whoever else who want to write off internal governance as "meaningless" or "it doesn't matter." I would just ask, how has that Fannie Mae-style attitude worked for the IL GOP?
Fast forward. The Democrats are leading the effort to impeach a Democrat Governor.
Huge difference. GOP hypocrisy in full force early this new year of 2009.
Stay tuned.
But it is good to see McKenna come out swinging. That is his job right now, so don't knock him for it.
His other job is to sit down with GOP leaders and potential candidates across the state to create that "Contract with Illinois" concept for 2010. It is a winner, and the only way back to political relevance.
anon @ 1:08, the Illinois law that relates to the U.S. Constitution reads
"the Governor shall make temporary appointment to fill such vacancy until the next election of representatives in Congress, at which time such vacancy shall be filled by election"
The US Constitution give the state the ability to say what election would apply. In Illinois we would need all of the Congressmen to resign at the same time and then have the governor pick the same date for an election to their seats. Then we could have an early special election for the Senate seat. I'm not saying it wouldn't be a bad idea if they all resigned but don't hold your breath. Roland keeps on rolling until 2010.
Because he was friggin arrested by the FBI for trying to sell a senate seat, lets not pretend this is some sort of 'profiles in courage' moment for the IL Democratic party
Yes, and the requirement that the appointee serve until the next congressional election is statutory, not constitutional and can be changed if the legislator wants to act, hence the part where I said a new law be enacted.
Get away from those issues (as the IL Dems have done on guns) and the IL GOP should be able to recover.
http://www.lib.niu.edu/1980/ii800204.html
and I also know a former agency director who can vouch for this.
"During 1975, Quinn was considered one of the infamous "ghost payrollers" of the Walker administration. The former governor placed dozens of assistants on agency payrolls where the employee did little or no work and did not report to supervisors there. Walker was accused of attempting to disguise how he had expanded the number of employees in the governor's office because of his campaign pledge not to do so.
Quinn was one of those employees. He was hired in January 1973 as an $18,000 a year assistant and was given a title indicating he would be a liaison to the public. The following year, he was given a pay raise to $20,000. The next year, he was shifted to the payroll of the Illinois Industrial Commission and received a raise to $23,000. At that point, Quinn became the target of legislative inquiry. Legislators, many in open confrontation with Walker, grilled agency directors about their payrolls when they appeared before appropriations committees. The chairman of the Industrial Commission, during one question session, admitted Quinn did not work full time for the agency. The lawmakers also accused Quinn of being "in conflict of interest" because he telephoned legislators seeking support for proposed constitutional amendments while on the commission payroll."
How about Larry Bomke. He seems like a straight shooter. Just a thought.
That's just absurd, but it's typical of the kind of destructive, dishonest talking points that the Hastert/Cellini/Kjellander wing (of which McKenna is a part) was putting out back then. They made it clear to Peter that if he ran for reelection, he would have no "party" support. He would have to rely solely on his personal fortune.
Peter Fitzgerald "antagonized" some people alright, people like Bill Cellini, Dennis Hastert, George Ryan, Mayor Daley, the McKennas, Bob Kjellander, etc. etc.
But the citizens of Illinois view Peter as a hero.
If the likes of Andy Junior had their way, Blago wouldn't be under arrest today, because Peter wouldn't have been allowed to bring in a real independent prosecutor like Patrick Fitzgerald in the first place.
The "Contract" concept is not just for the voters, as the GOP will need it for unity. As "GOP'er" shows, unity is in short supply. The Conservative vs. Moderate feud has been ripping the party apart for years, and doing the Democrats' job for them.
A list of concrete proposals that all can rally around would do a lot. It's best to keep abortion, gay rights and such off the list. That will drive certain obsessed elements crazy, but it will be better to speak to the average citizen and state what the GOP will do to repair all the damage. There is so much damage at this point.
With George Ryan in jail, Bob Kjellander gone, and Cellini and Vrdolyak looking at jail time, 2010 represents a vital chance to break the Combine and remold the Illinois GOP into a vehicle for positive change for Illinois citizens.
For sure, there are elements in the GOP that like the Combine and do not want that change, as well as faux "reformers" that want change on their own self-promoting terms.
But it can be done if the State leadership is willing to set the goal.
If you want to capitilize on this, start recruiting better candidates and have a legislative agenda.
The GOP already has essentially the same thing as a "contract" - it's called the Platform. Illinois Republicans actually adopted a pretty good one this year at their state convention.
One of the first things many Republican state reps and senators did this year was to shamelessly violate the no new gambling plank.
When some people talk about "unity" what they really mean is "just shut up and let the same misfits keep conning voters."
Whiny rubbish. You are obsessed with intra-party infighting. That is part of the problem.
Gingrich didn't hand people a platform, he identified issues that would be voted on if the GOP obtained control of the House. That is what people what to hear about.