-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/06/06/not-a-big-deal/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
How many don't have to pay?
Cut corners everywhere else and just say here "hot performer A" is $3 million to play the Illinois State Fair.
And please, please, get some decent music acts to play the fair. The recorded music industry is in the dumper and bands need to tour to make a buck, so let's get better music.
It wouldn't raise money, but might attract attention: Add "legislators" to the livestock exhibition. Each fundraiser/string-puller could exhibit their work in the form of a complacant legislator, exhibited in a simple wooden stall. Each day they could groom the lawmaker, de-lint his suit, and hose out the stall waste. They could be judged on things like brilliance of smile, glossiness of hair, ability to speak in whole sentences, and overall appropriations brought home.
The winner would of course be slaughtered and eaten.
Why is it acceptable, or even logical to think that the state should be in the business of losing money every year in order to entertain the citizens of the state.
I could understand throwing 4.3 million dollars down the drain if the state was awash in cash, but there are more important things to be funding with those dollars than state fairs.
Also, how many states have TWO state fairs? I know the logic is that since Illinois is a "long" state geographically that it gives more people the chance to participate in this year cash dump.
I like going to the fair as much as anyone else, but why is it acceptable for the state to lose money year after year on fairs, when if these dollars were being lost in some other state agency there would be media members and capitol fax blog comments screaming from the rooftops.
I can get a corndog and a soda at the grocery store, I dont need to lose 4.3 million every year for that.
Man, some people are just downers about everything.
I'm not trying to be a "downer" but I do know that the people of DuQuoin would rather have a new high school with that 4.3 million dollars than another fair.
I recently toured the highschool in DuQuoin and the students there go to class in rooms that have buckets catching water leaking through the roof.
The main office runs over a dozen computers off of power strips that are plugged into one another. There are more pressing needs than the fairs, there may be hospitals shut down because of slow payment from the state.
I dont mind a state fair, but when the Ag spokeman Jeff Squibb says the purpose of the fair is not to make a profit, it makes me beleive they are not even trying to make it break even, that is a deservice to the people of Illinois.
At least choose the right number.
I love going to the fair, but if it's supposed to be a showcase of the state's agricultral assets, then why isn't it? The 4-H kids are shoved back into one corner of the grounds and practically ignored...it's all about the grandstand shows, the rides, the entertainment venues, etc. How many people actually go to the cattle shows (other than the participants)? Maybe if they would focus on the agricultural aspects of it more, rather than spending money on the non-agricultural sides, they wouldn't be losing so much money.
I would bet those non-ag things is where they make the money. Or at least many of the non-ag things.
Since bureaucratizing the State Fair, it has had little incentive to justify itself. They focus on attendance numbers and compare those numbers to other bureaucratized state fairs. This is a very low hurtle, don't you agree?
Just how slack can they act? Now they aren't even concerned if they break even? After years of flat attendance and a debt, they are "fine"?
They must be used to working with animal offal, because that excuse stinks in my opinion.
Agricultural focus and wholesome family entertainment barely defines the Illinois State Fair. As a Chicagoan I loved the fair because except for the Lincoln Park Petting Zoo, there were few places I could go to see domesticated farm animals and see something green besides the Chicago River on St. Patty's Day. Seeing farm kids show their 4-H projects and watching the cleanest farm animals ever shown was a delight.
I still like it, but the State Fair is in a horrible rut. There seems to be little effort in making the Fair one deserving the name Illinois. There had been an embarrassingly dated Jimmy Buffet-ish Margaritaville area, (how this fits into Central Illinois is beyond me), a Mayberry-Andy Griffith-ish area which is presented like a bad high school drama, while real farm animals are shown on the periphery of the fairgrounds as though they are secondary players to the beer tents and bad carnival rides.
It seems that the people responsible for the State Fair are contented to wash down the streets, take out the trash and drop a new cake into the urinals - then open the gates again.
Demanding a profit as well as demanding higher attendance figures, all done under basic auditing standards is the least we could expect from these people. The fair lasts only a couple of weeks, couldn't they try?
And the high school situation there is likely the same problem we have with ed funding statewide: basing the funds off property taxes means rich areas have good schools and poorer areas get scraps.
Yes, we could scale back the state fairs to purely agricultural exhibitions. Attendance would certainly drop quite a bit. You will never get to a point where it will break-even just on the livestock showing, because you still need money for the premiums (prizes) for the winners, which draws the farmers to undertake the expense of raising and transporting and showing their animals in the first place. Raise entry fees on the exhibitors too high, and nobody will show. I think this is just one of those cases where government is there to do what pure capitalistic free market forces can't do. Some things you don't do just for profit.
So non-ag components are a needed boost. Good stewardship demands though that such added attractions be chosen based on their potential to bring in more than they cost. This is why you get the entertainment you see, and some complain about: these are the available and affordable acts you can get for that time of the year that will attract people living within a couple hours' drive of the venue. Springfield is surrounded by farmland, with a few college towns poking out here and there. You will always get more country music acts than rap or etc. because of this. I thought it was smart and brave to book Weird AL this year: we already got our tickets and are sure he's going to sell out the grandstand as one of the few non-country "family-friendly" acts there this year.
I grew up on a farm in Iroquois County. We didn't get much entertainment out there, so the county fair was a big deal. If it was all animals, it would've been a huge bore for us 4H kids. Also, when we went to the State Fair the animals were fine, but the rest of the extravaganza blew my young mind.
Farm kids like that non-ag stuff, too.
One step in that direction is to have the facts available and to have some professionals review the data to see if changes can be made to the cash flow without damaging the experience.
If everything that can be done is already in place, the show the citizens the analysis and that should satisfy the casual questioner.
The problem generally stems from the fact that in government, we want to do what is 'good' regardless what the cost. Examples are public transportation and health care. The fairs are just a tiny element of the thought process.
Ultimately what percentage of the residents of Illinois attend the events? Everyone pays for it, but only a few enjoy the largess.
I guarantee you that if you tell the people of DuQuoin that they can have a new school, but that the fair would be taken away as an exchange, you would have a revolt on your hands. Besides, the DuQuoin State Fair isn't just about DuQuoin. It's about the entire region.
Hey Larry I got some great land to sell you!!!
The Chicago area seems to be left out. A nice taxpayer subsidized shindig in Naperville or Waukegan I'm sure would be enjoyed by the masses and no one in the rest of the state would mind their tax dollars going to it.
heck, turn the Taste of Chicago over to the state and let taxpayers everywhere subsidize that. Everyone on board?
What's fair is fair.
Oh I'm aware fine lawmakers like Ken Dunkin ensure the Chicago area gets its share of taxpayer subsidized "house music" festivals and the like.
But c'mon, $3 million in losses and that place barely has electricity because the wiring rotted out. Raise prices, do something to at least make it appear you're putting forth an effort.
If there was a line item in the state budget or agency for the Taste of Chicago and every year it exceeded revenues by a couple millions dollars, downstaters would scream.
You know it. I know it.
Anyone who thinks differently is just wrong.
As a Chicagoan that has spent a lot time downstate, as well as grew up in a rural area, please do me a favor - for you own safety, never say to folks in rural Illinois that Chicago is being slighted by not having a major state-supported event in the Chicago area.
The fairs are one of the few expenditures the gov has left us to enjoy. He keeps cutting parks and not repairing roads. All that is left is to ride your horse to the local county fair.
The Auditor General is a genious... Hey... Nothing the state is involved in makes money or seems efficient in any way. I won't even charge them for the report....
What they should do is charge everyone and send them to building or booth and make them prove they should get a refund...Have the state police enforce no exceptions.....
exactly.
If this kind of event was in the Chicago area people would scream about wasteful Daley/Stroger regimes.
But it's downstate and theirs tractors so it's all good.
Oh, we don't have enough to pay health care providers. We'll I'm sure that has nothing to do with the State Fair and it's red ink.
Fair's great. Go to it every year. But it hasn't changed appreciably in the dozen years I've been going.
Seems like at least an effort could be made to either make it more efficient or make the losses more justifiable other than saying it's downstate tradition.
Just wait until the bills for the 2016 Olympics start coming due.
Starting in 1965'ish, it funded construction of the town swimming pool. Now 40-some years later, it is helping fund the new pool as well (after funding numerous ball diamonds, etc. over the years). Check it out some year. It has the best slow-grilled turkey around; not to mention the strawberry shortcakes and smoothies:) It's less than an hour's drive north of Springfield.
$963,539 in gate receipts. $3 per person. That means only 321,000 paid attendees. But the ISF says at least double attended the Fair. Not likely ABC and their contracted clubs let 320,000 slip in unpaid. Anyone who has attended the ISF for the duration knows more than 320,000 attended. So what happened to the money?