-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/12/10/our-day-together/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
And the fact that I couldn't access this site at various times yesterday showed how this was the blog to be yesterday. Great job!
I have to agree with the previous post in that I believe Blagojevich will not go quietly nor will he miss an opportunity to try to fill the vacant Senate seat. His only sane move is to appoint a respected party regular (likely to be a mere seatwarmer) in a belated bid to redeem himself.
Honest question: Jim Ryan caught flack for not investigating GHR (a lot from Blago, ironically). Why didn't Little Lisa Madigan investigate Blago?
I would love a special run-off election. It may bring back Oberwies and the powedered wig guy, but this would be so much fun!
Rich, the coverage on this blog over the course of the last 24 hours or so has been absolutely superb. It has become THE place to go for political news in Illinois. A daily must-read for insiders & interested citizens.
Thank you & keep up the good work.
Did Tony and Chris Kelly lose their leverage?
Why the rush for a special election? I can't believe the Senate would seat a Blago appointment, no matter who it is. Why not impeachment and be done with him
If there were a special election, how long would the primary season for that election be.
Is one possibility that Blago would create some kind of citizens commission to advise him on the selection to deflect the special election option.
A face-saving way to retain some control.
Thanks for your hard work on this eventful yet tragic happening. No joy in what happened but probably overdue looking at the Gov's past. Truly a delusional character that needs to be removed from office ASAP by whatever means possible.
If the GA passes a bill making it a special election and takes away the Gov's athority to appoint during this session, and the Gov is still in his position Jan 14th when the new GA is seated, then vetos the bill, what is the provision for dealing with the veto after that session has been closed sine die?
Can they even take it up? dod they start all over again?
The gov has 60 to sit on a bill. We've seen it time and time again. I don't doubt that a veto could be overridden, but can they consider a bill from the prevous GA in the next one?
Todd
2. Did the timing prevent the Feds from taking down other players if the whle mess had been allowed to play itself out?
3. Was the Trib more amenable to staying quiet because their case was part of the operation?
4. Who are the particular Senate candidates in the named in the complaint?
5. Is it a crime to simply discuss a quid pro quo for a political appointment?
6. If the House impeaches, and the Senate convicts, does that bring Blagojevich's term as governor to an end?
You did a great job with the coverage. Thank You very much.
How much will this whole deal cost the Illinois taxpayers?
Just found it interesting that you had a former Daley budget director and a former assistant state's attorney under Daley indicted yesterday, yet thanks to the Obama fuss no one really considered Daley much on this.
I'm intrigued by thoughts of how this will play out in Springfield, and in Washington. The best case scenario is that Blago would resign rather than go through impeachment proceedings. But given his history that seems doubtful. Therefore, a protracted battle is most likely. That can only damage Illinois, as we will have only one Senator.
It was heartening to read that Blago was upset that all the Obama camp was willing to give for its preferred appointment was appreciation.
Blago for the forseeable future....and he isn't
going to name a "senior statesman" to the Senate;
he doesn't function that way. I wouldn't be surprised to see him appoint HIS WIFE...seriously.
Let the games begin!
Thanks again for the work you've already done this week. It is truly first-rate.
Rep. Fritchey was on WLS yesterday afternoon and said that the impeachment process would take months to play out. Is this the understanding of the other heavy hitters out there? Is the process as "simple" as a house and senate vote?
I'm proud of the coverage of this issue and glad to be a subscriber! Rich, you do a marvelous job. I hope all of your dreams will be realized.
Though many of them have been identified already, who are the unidentified individuals and senate candidates in the complaint?
John Harris was listed, but what did he do that would be considered for his particular benefit? The phone calls all seem to be aiding and abetting Blago.
Who else needs to be looking for legal representation as a result of the disclosed information? (Who did not rest well last night?)
Zell, the Trib's editorial staff, and the holding of the story. What's the real scoop?
Lisa did not for the same reason Jim Ryan did not.
Feds have a much easier time to get wires and wiretapping evidence. Also, the Feds usually ask the locals to stay out when they are working a case.
Why Ryan caught flack? Because Repubs are so stupid about not answering back on silly accusations. I dont think Lisa made those charges, she had surrogates.
I dont know why her opponent didnt' do that to her, more stupid campaigning.
It appears likely that the Feds told her to stay out of their investigation, which would be wise in any case as she couldn't help but appear politically/selfishly motivated.
I find it hard to believe that anyone would accept Blagojevich's appointment at this point. Maybe I underestimate naked self-interest, but why would you want to be attached to the sinking ship in any way if you're not already? And there's the real prospect that the Senate would not seat this person, not to mention what they'd have to deal with in two years as a jailed governor's pick.
Also, kudos for the coverage yesterday, this was the place to be.
What is this obscure Supreme Court rule we've started to hear about? It's my understanding that the A.G. would attempt to prove the Governor to be incapable/unqualified to perform his duties and the Supreme Court would either uphold or throw that argument out...so what then? If the Supreme Court determines the Governor to be incapable is that ruling a defacto removal from office?
If this is a Supreme Court rule, what precedent is there? There's certainly never been a case like this in Illinois history (at least not to the level of Governor)? I realize the possibility of this is well behind outright resignation or impeachment but it is interesting regardless...one of those fun Illinois quirks.
Look forward to your insights as this debacle continues.
If we don't want Rod appointing someone, get rid of him and let Quinn appoint or better yet just let the seat vacant until 2010. Do you think anyone will notice?
Nice work, Rich. This blog has been invaluable lately. I appreciate your efforts here. The analysis and context you provide are top-notch.
2. Is a special election the only option? The Hotline blog reported yesterday that a "special election to fill Pres.-elect Barack Obama's Senate seat could cost the state of Illinois between $45 million and $50 million, a state Board of Elections official told On Call this afternooon." In this particular instance, I think I would prefer for the party of the outgoing Senator give a list of three names for the governor to chose from. In this case, the party would be the State Central Committee. Several states do this.
3. How quickly can impeachment be completed? Illinois government was already paralyzed by Blagojevich; even if he was acquitted, government is Illinois will remain at a standstill unless Blagojevich is removed from office.
You can see page one of this letter (courtesy of Cap Fax - great public archives, Rich!) at http://thecapitolfaxblog.com/usattylettr1.jpg.
Can we bury this "where was Lisa?" meme, please?
Sounds like an election to me.
Quinn and AG Madigan talked about petitioning the IL Supreme Court regarding Blago's ability to govern. I've looked around and can't find info about how this process would work. Is it as simple as filing a petition saying the dude's insane or is there a longer process of gathering evidence and illustrating the potential impact of his governing skills (or lack thereof)? Would the Court then have the ability to impeach or otherwise kick him out?
"Michelle Obama Is The “Specifically Named Individual†On Page 64 of The Affidavit Submitted by FBI" Here's the most informative source http://www.noquarterusa.net/ (You have to scroll down to see the story.
How about the national Dems who are this/close to having a filibuster-proof majority, as well as Republicans/conservatives hoping to block any of Obama's more radical legislative proposals or his U.S. Supreme Court appointments.
Does the timing of Filan's appointment to the Finance Authority now make him a target, if he was not already?
SECTION 6. GUBERNATORIAL SUCCESSION
(a) In the event of a vacancy, the order of succession to the office of Governor or to the position of Acting Governor shall be the Lieutenant Governor, the elected Attorney General, the elected Secretary of State, and then as rovided by law.
(b) If the Governor is unable to serve because of death,conviction on impeachment, failure to qualify, resignation or other disability, the office of Governor shall be filled by the officer next in line of succession for the remainder of the term or until the disability is removed.
(c) Whenever the Governor determines that he may be seriously impeded in the exercise of his powers, he shall so notify the Secretary of State and the officer next in line of succession. The latter shall thereafter become Acting Governor with the duties and powers of Governor. When the
Governor is prepared to resume office, he shall do so by notifying the Secretary of State and the Acting Governor.
(d) The General Assembly by law shall specify by whom and by what procedures the ability of the Governor to serve or to resume office may be questioned and determined. The
Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to review such a law and any such determination and, in the absence of such a law, shall make the determination under such rules as it may adopt.
that's what I think, but want to make sure. It we are right, then session monday is all show, as if the Gov digs in, and I bet he does, then he still has the reigns untill he is removed. Thus the seat will be vacant for a while.
I will also repeat what I said minutes after the Wyma statement was released about not wearing a wire -- he planted a bug for the feds. Remember they said he facilitated the recording. yesterday fotz admitted to a Bug. Unless they had some hollywood FBI black bag type team go in, I bet they go Wyma to plant the bug.
Beware of holiday gifts this season, you never know what might be in the flower pot.
T
I'm very concerned that the first thing from Dem leadership was a special election. Enough politics! It's time to govern and the GA has the means at its disposal to do what is absolutely necessary now.
There are critical issues beyond Blago that need to be addressed now. We are in crisis here with a governor who can still create a lot of mischief and cause a lot of harm with his lawful and constitutional powers.
IMPEACHMENT
The House of Representatives has the sole power to conduct legislative investigations to determine the existence of cause for impeachment and, by the vote of a majority of the members elected, to impeach Executive and Judicial officers. Impeachments shall be tried by the Senate. When sitting for that purpose, Senators shall be upon oath, or affirmation, to do justice according to law. If the Governor is tried, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall preside. No person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the Senators elected. Judgment shall not extend beyond removal from office and disqualification to hold any public office of this State. An impeached officer,
whether convicted or acquitted, shall be liable to
prosecution, trial, judgment and punishment according to law.
The political question, however, is how do Madigan and Cullerton play this? They have the ultimate weapon against Blago now. If they work together, they can hold impeachment over his head to get what they need to minimize the damage to their party.
While I was in as big a celebratory mood as anyone over this yesterday, the big question that no one seems to be asking is: In the sort term, so what? The wonk in me is overjoyed, but for most Illinoisans, this really does not mean much; state parks are still closed, as are rehab facilities, daycare centers, and the rest of the cuts already made. Pontiac prison is still threatened, as is extension funding, SWCD and other programmatic partners as well as state venders are still not getting paid in anything that resembles a timely manner. Control of the machines of state government are still in the hands of Rod’s political appointees (or payees as the case may be), and there is still a budget hole big enough to fly an entire fleet of state airplanes through.
Does anyone really believe that a Gov. Quinn (or as I think Gov. Madigan, after Pat appoints himself Sen.) can find money to solve all of the problems facing Illinois? While, the inside baseball stuff is important, interesting, and fun, real problems still exist, and one crooked politician going to the pokey will not change that.
According to regular poster Arthur Andersen, W&S quit working for the Gov when he stiffed them on some past bills for legal work.
and, Rich Miller, thanks for the work. this site was such a valuable place to be yesterday, more than ever.
listen to radio news in my car. I get everything I want to know from CF.
So when does Blago go back to court to enter his plea?
We still had a civil war between Madigan and Blagojevich that locked up Illinois, so what good did it do us to wait around for Blagojevich to decide his own fate? We didn't have any recourses to neutralize him? No one was willing to risk exposing Blagojevich as the sham he is? How many breaks can we give a flailing loser in the governor's office?
We live in an era when we cannot afford incompetence. It should not be accepted. Yet we continue to see citizens accept giving a flailing loser an entire term to flail in office as though we can afford to have the duties their office performs go unfulfilled. How can we expect a higher standard in elected office when we set so low a bar?
For those of you who tout the benefits of government controlled societies, you are setting us up for catastrophe if you do not create a better way to weed out incompetent candidates for office. As we see a growing demand on government services, the political parties that fill these jobs with applicants on Election Day must take their jobs seriously and get rid of the Blagojevichs before they are elected. We must either learn how to get better public officials in government, or we need to learn how to weed ourselves off of government.
We cannot depend on our current system.
In 2002, we sat at a point where if Illinois took the wrong course, we would dig ourselves into a deeper hole than we were under Governor Ryan. Well, with Blagojevich, we did further damage. So the next administrations need to not only repair the damage Blagojevich's time in office had created, we would still remain behind the eight ball as we were in 2002 when the Blagojevichian damage is finally undone. This will require exponentially more successful administrations than we have seen in Illinois in probably 50 years.
Removing Blagojevich is only a first step. We still have government leaders that let him fester and damage Illinois remaining in their positions. These losers need to go as well as they are just as incompetent during our ongoing emergency. We will not get the government we need if the current cadre of statewide officials remain.
The corruption within Illinois government is far deeper than Rod Blagojevich. We will not succeed until we get rid of all of it.
And it's not just Blago. Guys like Rezko, Cellini, Levine - these are men who are already wealthy, and they're not young men. Why break the law to earn an extra $2 million that you don't need? For heaven's sake, buy a pair of white shoes and move down to Florida and enjoy your golden years. I just don't understand why the act of scouring the well for the last few remaining drops is worth going to prison when you've already gotten all the water you'll ever need.
(d) The General Assembly by law shall specify by whom and by what procedures the ability of the Governor to serve or to resume office may be questioned and determined. The
Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to review such a law and any such determination and, in the absence of such a law, shall make the determination under such rules as it may adopt.
Can't the GA just pass a law under section d stating that indictment or arrest for a federal felony qualifies as a "disability" under section b until such time as the disability is removed (i.e. dismissal or finding of innocence). So, in that situation, Blago would be disabled and Quinn would serve until Blago's sace is resolved. Seems more logical to me than trying to rush an impeachment or trying to schedule a special election that will surely be challenged (even if it does get by the Gov's veto).
If Sen Candidate 1 was Jarrett, and 5 were JJ JR. I would suppose that 4 is Emil Jones because he would be the only one who might give up the seat to allow the Gov to parachute in?
The Capitol Fax was on top of it yesterday kudos Rich.
1) Timing - As Fitz said it was to make him cease and desist (sit him in the corner so to speak.) This and Rich's insight months ago saying if nothing happens by the end of the year - we will have to wait until almost the end of next year.
2) We do not need to spend millions on a special election - Dems should lead and appoint someone soon (or follow or get out of the way.)
Is anything happening with smiling Patty B.?
Congrats on getting your column in the Sun-Times linked from RealClearPolitics.com today. Looks like you could be headed for the big time!
Argonaut-the criminal information complaint is basically used to stop crimes in progress or to get dangerous felons off the street. In many, but not all cases, further evidence is presented to a grand jury which returns indictments. If the matters at hand are not time-sensitive, the prosecutor will go straight to the grand jury with a fully developed "case."
AA doesn't gamble, but it would be a very good bet that there will be a grand jury and there will be indictments before St. Patrick's Day.
Is there anyway a "one time" agreement could be reached and the law later changed/amended to take this power away from the sitting governor?
This will never happen until political corruption is made so painful and unprofitable that no politican thinks about doing it. It is something like the offense of kidnapping. The FBI, as an institution, has made kidnapping such an unprofitable crime that few, if any, even dare to try it today. If you get caught, and you most likely will, you are going to get hammered by the FBI. So it should also be for politicians.
Fitzgerald took another small step in that direction yesterday.
Word - did you ever watch the TV show Crime Story back in the eighties? It was loosely based on Tony the Ants' crew and they did a pretty good job of capturing this. Ray Luca just couldn't stop putting down scores because of the rush he got.
The question of Filan's status at IFA is really intriguing. I continue to suspect/believe that many of the financial actions of this administration were flat out illegal. It is my hope that those responsible for such actions will be held accountable.
Thank you, Rich.
According to the ARDC: "Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 2008"
Interesting.
We will not get better government until we demand better government.
Quinn made insinuations that Durbin's daughter recieved a scholarship that may have been of a nefarious nature.
I dont' think he has ever forgot that one.
Honestly, Quinn has never been popular with anyone.
One memory that I have was being at O'Hare on the Sunday before the convention in Boston four years ago seeing all the other pols socializing amongst themselves after a tough legislative session and Pat Quinn was sitting there by himself like the lonesome kicker.
I have witnessed the same thing at parades also.
Well I never thought the first Fenwick man to be governor would be Quinn. I have heard that many times too.....
It's the General Assembly responsibility to remove him. The longer he stays in office the more damage it will do to Obama, the next U.S. Senator from Illinois and the Democrats in 2010.
Every picture, every quote of every Democrat posed with Blagojevich or whoever said anything nice about the rat will be used in the next primary and then in the general election.
As we find out more and more of the details look for campaign materials to use those quotes and pictures interspersed with datelines of what the governor was doing.
Remember, Blago almost always came downstate for official events when it corresponded with a fundraiser. On those dates those pictures were taken and those positive quotes given.
When overlaid with whatever illegal action taken in conjunction with the fundraiser (and yes, those connections may be a stretch, but they will be used), it will make a very damning indictment for use in all sorts of campaign ads, commercials, mailers, and whatnot.
If Rod is still governor Sunday, Madigan will be forced to take action Monday.
Remember, the tapes show the first lady (ahem!), took part in the conspiracy to defraud the taxpayers of honest government. The complaint wasn't against her, but what will the grand jury do when they get to hear her voice on the tapes.
It took Spitzer a few days in New York to realize that he was going to resign. Just don't panic by the attorney's statement yesterday that Blago won't.
I would still bet he will.
Note: Having said this, if they go with the insanity defense which would explain much of his actions, then there is a mental disability at play and the Supremes would have the opening to act.
I have been one of the many who have been glued to the national news programs. I believe that some of them have a better understanding of Illinois politics than most of the residents of this state. Questions they have been asking have been on the order of: The Illinois citizens did not know what they were getting in 2002 but by 2006 they knew Blagojevich was a crook so why did he get re-elected; Illinois has such a long history of political corruption, who else is to blame for this but the citizens themselves for continuing to vote the crooks in office.
And to that I say AMEN. We really have no one to blame but ourselves for Blago getting back into office in 2006. I will admit to voting for him in 2002 because I was pretty tired of 26 years or so of GOP rule and I was ready for a change. Blago promised that change to us. However, it didn't take too long into his first term to know that he was keeping up his campaign promise of "no more business as usual". And in 2006, or probably even in 2005, he jumped out of the box with his huge campaign warchest and bought up prime TV time with his "What Was She Thinking" ads linking JBT to GRyan. And a majority of those who still had a sense of civic duty and bothered to vote, bought that mantra and voted for Blago AGAIN.
So we can impeach, Blago can resign, LMadigan can ask the Supreme Court to remove him from office. It all makes not one single bit of difference if we, the voters, have not learned our lesson and demand better representation by first CLEANING HOUSE. We need to stop falling for the excuse from our legislators that experience will trump inexperience and we should vote the incumbants back into office. This state would be better off with high school students sitting in the House and Senate.
Illinois is now know by the entire nation (and probably those in the world who give a rats behind) as the MOST CORRUPT STATE IN THE NATION. We owe it to ourselves, to our children, and to our grandchildren to clean up this system. We can't rely on the politicans to do it themselves.
On one last note about Blago. It wouldn't surprise me if he were to plead an insanity defense. Rich I'm serious about this. I can't understand why someone who knew he was in deep hot water would continue on his merry way with "business as usual". I don't think he's stupid. I think he's as sharp as a tack in certain areas. I believe he has continued with this whole senate appointee business with the thought in mind that no sane person would do this and thus, if caught, he would cop an insanity plea. This is not a real far stretch of the imagination.
And he thought he could run for U.S. President in 2016. OMG, what a state.
Lavin
Rumman
Hamer
Campbell
Adams
Martin
DCFS
Bravo.
Everyone's comfort level is different. But according to the Trib, Patti made $700,000 in real estate commissions since 2000. Rod pulls down $170 grand plus as governor. That's pretty good coin.
What's the nature of the stress?
First, they took Obama's "no further comment" quote from yesterday and juxtaposed it with similar statements from Scott McCellan. "Sound familiar?" the anchorchick said.
Then some talking head named Cafferty did a quick rundown on Kerner, Walker, Ryan, and Blago. He ended by putting a question on his CNN blog. "What's the problem with Illinois politics?"
Wolf Blitzer (all-time best anchor name) just said all this is "putting a big, fat spotlight on Illinois politics and it's not pretty by any means."
And now a teaser for a story on Durbin's request for commutation for Ryan.
Is there speculation on who Individual A is and some of the others in the indictment?
Sheesh.
It's got to be a big time contractor who could be bonded by themselves or a joint venture for half a bil or more. Possible suspects - Walsh, K-5?