-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/02/20/question-of-the-day-683/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Twitter, I use more as a news aggregator. I've friended most of the major media and columnists in Chicago, along with the Post-Dispatch and other newspapers, CNN, ESPN, etc. It keeps me connected.
I rarely send tweets myself, maybe one or two a day.
Facebook, I update my status often and checking it from my cell phone is becoming a (scary) ritual.
My friends can reach me 24 hrs. a day by e-mail and cell phone. Just text me, if you want to stay in touch.
I can upload pics once, everyone sees them.
Being a married adult, I see absolutely no purpose or positive benefit to being on Facebook or other more socially oriented networking sites.
The only friends I need to connect with (the only ones I actually have) are Yellow Dog Democrat and Vanilla Man.
Facebook is my primary communication tool.
Personally I don't feel comfortable posting things that people can look at all the time. Makes me feel like I'm living in a glass house.
I know there are debates about Facebook jumping the shark when the dominate users turned middle-aged. I suspect that the personal engagement that the users have with Facebook will keep it from being another AOL or Second Life.
Twobile for my Windows Mobile Treo is good for following twitter there. Twitter and Facebook both have mobile browser interfaces too. I do Facebook from the Treo that way.
Isn’t anyone concerned about their privacy?
Ever see the first Indiana Jones? Remember how the US gov hid the ark? That is the way I feel about it.
I obsessed about my first GF for a week on FB, and almost no one noticed.
The issue isn't "won't the world see it" but "will anyone bother to look". *^^*
Twitter, no. I don't understand its purpose or appeal.
Facebook - for personal and professional networking, mostly personal; I update my status daily via their mobile tool and have reconnected with almost everyone from high school, college and grad school. My dad is on it, now.
MySpace - I closed my account.
Friendster - closed years ago.
LinkedIn - rarely used; I use it just to update my work history for professional networking.
I'm on Facebook and have connected with one person from high school, some people I met on the Internet, and most of my family, who I've found to be just as insufferable on FB, if not more.
I'm on LinkedIn and love the concept, but so far it hasn't helped me get work, which is why I joined.
As for Twitter, I tweeted up a storm during the presidential debates. These days I'm good for some inconsequential thought once or twice a day. For the most part, I thrive on the tweets from other people. Lots of good stuff there. It is very useful. Very entertaining. And sometimes educational. I love it.
Did anyone tell Roland that?
Facebook's been good for reuniting with some old friends and family members I don't make enough of an effort to keep up with. Twitter's been less useful, but I've been adding some good news sources so it's getting better.
As I recently heard someone say, "Facebook is to email, as Twitter is to texting." Glad to see so many of your readers diving in.
I'm tired and have no energy to deal with 5th CD comments right now. You made your point.
Sure, they decided to pull back, but what's to say they won't try it again in a year or so once they have more info in their systems?
I also find it fascinating that alot of these "networking" sites" links to "unsuscribe" often do not work and/or after you do cancel your account, the data still stays in the cache until it clears out.
I can see it now: a decade from now, people running for office are going to be brought down because they allowed a convicted child molester or someone in as a "friend". They'll be pleading guilty but only because they wanted to show the world how popular they are through their "friend" count.
Reminds me of an attorney I knew who was unfortunate enough to have a picture taken of him with Gacy dressed as a clown at a fundraiser. (That was the one and only time he'd met him.) Once the story broke, he was investigated solely because of that picture and people did begin to wonder.
THAT picture was never even posted on the internet.
I am a complete Twitter addict. The secret is to follow the right people. I also have two accounts, one personal the other social.
Also, I get all the news faster on Twitter then any other source. The last time an airplane went down I saw it on twitter then turned on the cable news - five minutes later they finally 'broke' the story. Newspapers & television RIP. Long live the blogs and micro blogs!