-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/06/19/question-of-the-day-337/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Too bad Paul Simon is no longer with us.
Arnold or Newt also fit the description. We know they're all busy with other concerns right now but you asked for ideal.
No BS. Not afraid of anybody (including Madigan).
And if you don't like it, he'll clock you.
Smart, proven businessman, creative, can attract creative, competent staff, willing to be innovative, willing to take on the teachers unions, independent.
He would make things entertaining, if nothing else...
What the heck, let's bring back Alan Keyes while we're at it.
Fitgerald was an interesting choice as well. Schock? He may be dreamy, but as Gov? Wow...now I see how we got into this mess in the first place with Governor Hair.
My pick is Rep. Rich Myers (R-94). Rich is a class act. He is always willing to listen to others and work with them (sorely needed around here), go out of his way to help out people when they need it and wouldn't use the Governor's office to test drive his ambitions for higher office.
If all else fails, I could run for Governor. How hard could it be?
I believe that health care will become a very big issue this summer for a couple of reasons. First, we are entering presidential primary season. Health care will reenter the public discourse in a big way. Second, like him or not, Michael Moore's movie "Sicko" will be released on June 29th and he will put the horrible state of health care in the U.S. right out in the open for all to see. For those who say that this is a national issue and not a state issue, I tell you to look back at blagojevich's announcement speech in August of 2001. He told you that there were problems in the state and that we couldnt wait for Washington DC to act.
He raised the minimum wage without waiting for the federal government. He passed the Equal Pay act without the federal government. He guaranteed that women who are prescribed birth control by their doctor are not denied their meds by their pharmacist. He mandated new mercury reduction standards that go far beyond any federal effort to protect our environment. He made this state one of the most union friendly states in the country (while AFSCME may object, they got a very good contract). He provided health care to hundreds of thousands of people who didnt have it before he came to office, including ALL KIDS.
And now he wants to provide health care for all. Dont say he didnt tell you that he would do this. And dont say that this is a national issue because for as much as you all say that nothing gets done in SPringfield, the reality is that, compared to the federal government, we get a lot of good things done here in Illinois.
Rod Blagojevich is my governor, and, if he runs again, I will knock on doors, pass out lit, and get out the vote.
A bit off topic, but in light of current events: talk about the road not traveled. It was Blago 37%, Vallas 34% in the 2002 primary. On this point, it's also worth noting that for all the dislike Blago currently engenders Downstate, Downstate is the reason Blago is governor. He carried 56 percent of it in 2002, his margin statewide. Even though he won't leave it, Chicago _didn't_ elect this fool. He came in third in the primary there.
it was only a matter of time...
How about just an average governor? Right now we don't even have that.
We need a governor who shows up to work on time. One that listens. One that builds teams. One that is bipartisan. One that is humble. One that lives in the Mansion and works at the Capitol. One that has running committees and teams designated to working with other state leaders to pass legislation smoothly. One that knows that an annual budget means that a budget is needed every year.
We need a governor who doesn't staff offices with partisan hacks that paid for their positions with campaign contributions. We need a governor who will pass reform, or pass executive orders to reign in the unethical behavior they see in their own office.
I don't care what gender they are, what party they are, what age they are. I don't even care if they are all that "good".
We just need someone to show Rod Blagojevich how to do his freaking job.
At this time, that would be ideal!
Your post is the best I have read in a long time. My sentiments exactly! In addition to the accomplishments that you delineated, Governor Blagojevich also increased funding for education more than any governor in history and addressed the state pension funding issue through the use of bonds and increased state funding. Unfunded pension liabilities decreased as a percentage during his first 5 years and he has reformed benefits somewhat without hurting retireees.
Gov. Blagojevich promised to end business as usual and he has by taking his issues to the people. No longer can the Speaker dictate the state budget behind clossed doors. Rod Blagojevich is the people's governor. If he decides to run again, I will be right there with you helping to get out the vote.
Or clone Dick Durbin.
On top of all those accolades he understands Illinois as a whole (how many chicago pols ever even come close to that). Not only is he married to a downstater he has also actually been to all 102 counties!
He is the only person I know that would go into the office with such a background and have the (non testicular) fortitude to actually get the reform we so desperatly need across our state.
Honesty,ethics and genuie leadership ability, Dart would be the exactly what is needed at this time of crisis in Illinois
Your facts may be technically correct, but I can't help but scratch my head and think "Why is the state in such a mess, then?" It can't be all Madigan and Jones' fault.
Why do we have to fund health care first and education second? Why can't the RTA region be allowed to raise some reginal tax money to fund transportation? Why can't we raise the income tax and lower our property taxes? Why are legislators told to be in Springfield five days a week -- w/o a per diem and when they are not invited to sit in on leader negotiations -- and yet the Governor get's to spend $100K over the last three months on airplane bills in order to sleep in his own bed every night?
Why is electric rate relief not a top priority for this Governor? How can this Governor tout ethics, yet look the other way as all his pals are making big bucks setting up lobbying shops inside the Governor's office?
Why is the word "compromise" not in the Governor's vocabulary?
You gotta conclude that the Governor is thoroughly out of touch with the common man's needs. And that's why, despite all the good things he's done, no one can trust this guy to run a popsicle stand, let alone the state.
I dont fully understand your post. Why is it wrong for a leader to have a top priority? One could hardly say that the governor has not supported education (see Bill's post for the numbers). To your comment about "compromise," you just dont understand that compromise with the Speaker will mean that neither education, nor health care will get anything (in addition to a number of other issues that good democrats support).
I would say that the governor is far more in touch with the common man's needs than you would lead us to believe. I think that he would be happy to compromise if it didnt mean giving in to the powers that have led us to where we were before he was elected: poor health care, underfunded education, underfunded pension, lax environmental standards, women treated as inferiors, labor our in the cold, and children not provided for as they should be. "Compromise," as you call it, led to these shortcomings. The governor's unwillingness to "compromise" has allowed us to do things differently and see some good results (results that you didnt even dispute).
You know he has done good things. Stop reading the rants of the haters and accept what you know to be true -- this governor has done a good job.
He knew school systems and state finance.
Instead the democratic party choose worst governor and a better candidate. After Blago like Clinton the democrats might have along period of time before they get the governor's office back.
Both decent, honest, hardworking guys. Which is why da "machine" didn't support them.
As for Lisa Madigan or Kevin "Fists of Steel, Face like a boiled potato" Joyce........it would be nice to find "leaders" who didn't rely on "daddy" getting them elected.
I've had it with leaders who use family connections to get where they are. Be they named Bush, Clinton, Daley, Madigan, Blago-Mell, Joyce, Lipinski, Hynes, or whoever else I am missing.
I like Rep. Joyce and I hope he doesn't "clock" me for posting this.He would make a good governor but why mess with success. The Governor has always been willing to compromise and has compromised on several issues, gaming , for example. The cornerstone of his camapign was not raising income and sales taxes. He is sticking to his promise while trying to negotiate alternative sources of revenue for our state. He rightly is opposed to a tax "swap" believing, correctly, that it won't work, is poor policy, and favors the rich over the working citizen. He strongly favors a utility rate freeze and has said he will sign one. It is the GA that must pass one and that seems to be beyond their ability at this point. When the Governor tried to address Cook County property taxes, the Speaker boycotted the meeting because he doesn't like the Assessor.I would hope that the Leaders realize that they are all democrats and start to work together. If the state shuts down it won't be solely because of the governor and the president.
You can forget about ever having your garbage picked up, ever again. I think that you are going to have to move.
Remember the "pension holiday" we have to pay that back at 8.5%
The pensions were funded at around 48% when the Governor took office. They are close to 60% now. The pension holiday was the speaker's idea, not the governor's.
The truth shall set you free.
Number two on the list has to be Hynes. Here's a lowkey guy who knows how to get things done. There's no fluff. Some might say he's boring, but he gets the job done with integrity.
Thanks for oyur unwavering support. I knew we could count on you!
Sacia has served on school board and county board, so he knows local government. As a legislator, he works hard and follows through...and he has to because his district is sprawled over 5 counties. I have seen a lot of politicians come and go over the years, I wish there were more of them like Jim Sacia !
My perfect governor would be an independent who wants to keep taxes low but not have the disingenuous notion of increasing state government while trying to juggle around finances every May to do so. Cutting or keeping taxes low does not mean you have to cut government spending but it does mean that spending must stay level. Since Roe vs. Wade isn't going to be overturned any time soon, abortion stances won't matter. We need a budget hawk who will cut waste, get the state up-to-date on Medicaid and childcare payouts and use a veto threat only on spending and appropriations bills that will either harm the state or put us in a bind the year following the last budget. A perfect candidate would also restore funding to our public universities so that people like my brother and sister-in-law don't have to take out even bigger loans or face the prospect that their schools are on the receiving end of cuts and criticism.
Lisa's shown she's not a clone of her dad (which isn't all bad!) Her consumer efforts have been laudable. Dart and his criminal justice experience could be a winning combination.
Plus, the two of them 'have a clue'. They understand you can't govern by press conferences --- they can work with the legislature --- they get urban + downstate issues.
I can't decide what one word describes our current gov --- inept, gadfly, mope, empty shell, moron, incompetent, self-centered, egoist, etc etc etc.
In the immortal words of Red Forman from 'That 70's Show', I think the most appropriate term would be 'DUMBASS!'
They probably saw the handwriting on the wall. The bomb was set to go off in 2005.You know. You were there.
Lisa Madigan, she'll be an ideal Governor someday.
Or Jim Edgar... that would be fine too....
If George Ryan had not been a criminal, he would have been reelected to a second term easily and I believe Dan Hynes would have been elected Governor last November. Dan is the exact oppo0site of Blago - knowledgeable, competent , and engaged - not to mention ethical. I honestly believe Dan meets the most of the criteria set forth by Steve Schnorf, except that he does not have Jim Thompson's campaigning and communication skills.
Unfortunately, we tend to elect the best campaigners and the most attractive people, instead of those best qualified to govern.
I believe Lisa Madigan will be the next person elected as Governor in 2010. I'm sure she'll do an excellent job based upopn her performance as Attorney General. The only potential Republican nominee that I can see giving Lisa a run for her money would be Patrick Fitzgerald. The reason that I think a Fitzgerald candidacy would be plausible,if not likely,is that I think we are very close to a tipping point on public corruption in Illinois. An independent like Fitgerald could sweep to victory as a Republican nominee running on an anti-corruption platform.
Bring on Lisa Madigan.
I see Paul Vallas's name popping up. The media loved Paul and made him sound great but the reality was different. I'm glad he is not governor.
I think Dart has the best chance to scare Madigan away from running. He'll have a big army and he doesn't care what M Madigan wants. He'll also have Obama's support, which will help when he's living at 1600 Pennsylvania.
Among the Republicans, I would vote for both Peter and Patrick Fitzgerald as both men are known for their integrity which is something that we have been lacking in our last couple of governors. Steve Rauschenberger and Chris Lauzen are also good candidates for Governor of Illinois. They have the integrity, compassion, and the intellectual skills required to make excellent governors of Illinois.
Bill and A Democrat I am glad that you two are around for morbid humor. Your guy is so bad that George Ryan is looking good.
I voted for Joyce.
I'd suport Lisa over just about any Republican, but any of the three would make excellent Guvs
Ideal situation?
Joyce takes Maloney's Senate seat, "dethrones" Emperor Jones as Senate President, Lisa becomes Guv before being elected to the Senate after ousting "Turban Durbin" or Barack "What do I do now, Emil?" Obama.
Joyce follows Lisa as Guv, as well as becoming a middle weight contender.
I wish I could support a GOPer, but I'm not aware of any active in Illinois politics who's worthy of a leadership position.
I think Tom Cross represents the future of the ILGOP.
I also have liked Ray LaHood, although I can't really put my finger on why. I guess I just like how he's proud to be a Republican, but isn't afraid to stand up to party leadership when he thinks they are making a mistake or it isn't good for his district.