-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/06/02/question-of-the-day-104/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Can we have separate catagories for elected officials, operatives/activists/lobbyists, and pundits?
My first thought was political "activist" Matt Hale, but because Illnois' top bigot is currently behind bars, I don't want to waste my vote.
I'm going to have to say Joe Birkett. I find his continued defense of the death penalty indefensible, and his lack of contrition over his involvement in the wrongful death penalty prosecution of an innocent man appalling. I'm pretty much for open warfare when it comes to politics, but sending innocent men to death row to advance your political career, or keeping them there, or refusing to acknowledge the system screwed up royally -- that's the nuclear option as far as I see it.
I know alot of Democrats who would consider voting for Topinka if not for Birkett, and if I were Pulitzer Prize winner Cornelia Grumman and the Chicago Tribune editorial board, I would feel the same way.
I didn't want to nominate his boss because his boss does not have a brain and gets his ideas from from people who don't care about Illinois.
Like Brad Tusk.
The fact is, the buck stops at the Governor's desk.
Sure, there may be alot of people around the Governor who only tell him what he wants to hear. But from what I can tell, the Governor has pushed away or ignored people who tell him what he doesn't want to hear. I know for certain that some of his closest allies in the legislature warned the governor that renewing his no new taxes pledge was a bad idea. That's especially true in light of the Tribune poll which found 80% of voters believe the next Governor is going to have to raise taxes. But did the Governor listen? Of course not.
So, does Brad Tusk only tell the Governor what he wants to hear, does the Governor only hear what he wants to hear, or has Brad Tusk tried to tell the Governor things he doesn't want to hear and just given up because the Governor doesn't listen?
Who knows. But one things for certain, the buck -- and the blame -- rests with the Governor.
There are so many other instances and frankly I don't have time to list them all here.
Time will show he has been the worst politician of our time and one I can only hope we can fix the problems of in my generation.
He is doing absolutely nothing to get us out of the Iraq quagmire, where thousands of Americans have died for cheap oil. Not to mnention tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
70% percent of the population favors pulling out of Iraq. And yet Obama won't sponsor any legislation to advance this goal.
He's as big a part of the problem as Bush is.
AND if you want to dismiss The Brick's claims of non involvement in Cruz case, remember the "Get of Jail Free" Cards to the attorney/contributors, "loans" from tollway suspects and of cours the Hired Trucks guys who wander through DuPage no questions asked. The Brick remains the reason Judy Bore Topinka will get clobbered in November
As for the death penalty, millions of people in Illinois favor it. As for editorial boards, why don't you read the Daily Herald, who has followed Birkett's career closest. They have endorsed him in every race he's been in -- strongly praising his integrity and reform-mindedness on the death penalty.
AND anyone else notice no effort the beat back the "other issues" that should earn The Brick his exit visa.
Hmmmmmm TTFN
Obama will not support legislation to pull out of Iraq because he passed constitutional law. Such legislation would be worth the same as the guvs promise to clean up state government. The president is the Commander in Chief and Congress cannot force him to pull out of Iraq by resolution.
Birkett, come on, Lisa Madigan has once again failed to address a problem she beratted past politicians for. Last time I checked we still have the death penalty in IL, and Lisa Madigan may have some two bit commission or committee working on it, but has presented no viable solutions. Again she can really hammer away during a campaign behind Daddy, but has proven time and again an inability to get it done as an office holder. Second to the gov she is the biggest joke in politics today.
70% of the population is wrong.
Sen. Obama is smart enough to know that the easy way out will lead to a disaster beyond anything we can imagine.
Further, I love the sexist comments about Lisa Madigan. Nothing quite reminds me of why I am a Democrat that seeing comments like that from Republicans.
To get to the merits:
YDD got it right: Joe Birkett. Anyone who sends innocents to death row should be forever disqualified from holding any public office. Like YDD, Birkett on that ticket makes my vote easy. As much as I dislike Blago, I can't vote for a ticket that includes Birkett. I note that if the ticket included some right wing extremist like Rauschenberger at Lt. Gov., I might have considered it. No way with Birkett though.
You raise a good point about Moore. The man is a genuine dingbat who ignores real problems in his ward and instead concentrates on the irrelevant.
I hope nobody shows him any photos of how chickens are raised. He is going to close down every KFC in Chicago.
If an alderman is going to be strange, he better do the right thing for his ward. Ald. Natarus is an interesting guy known for bizarre statements and questionable dealings, but he takes care of the 42nd. Moore should watch Natarus to see how it is done.
Patriot, whether or not Congress has the power to order an end to operations in Iraq (and I strongly disagree with your position), I think even Justice Roberts would agree that Congress has another weapon at its disposal: power of the purse. If Congress wants us out of Iraq, it has a check on an unfettered executive: threaten to stop funding operations there. Not politically possible yet, but it eventually happened for Vietnam, and it may occur someday for Iraq.
Isn't it time for everyone who's received his tainted money to give that money back?
Dan Proft - close second. Negative politics can be good sport for all, but this guy is the prince of scorched earth, negative, duplicitous campaigning.
I'd add Peter LaBarbara, but man, that guy's just too funny to leave out of the picture. Research...sure.
The only reason good conservative Republicans do not perform better politically in this state is that has-been Governor Jim Edgar keeps repeating the mantra "conservatives can't win" which plays to the media and chills contributions.
Add to that his back-stabbing of Peter Fitzgerald, his lie-down in 04 as state chairman for Bush, his additional back-stabbing of Jack Ryan, and his coyness about running for Governor, just to allow Judy Topinka to run a successful, last minute "rose garden" campaign, and you have the makings of the most insidious saboteur in Illinois politics. Just as I nominate him as no. 1 for eradication from Illinois politics, I am sure that in a hypothetical private dinner with Blagojevich, Mike Madigan, and Rich Daley, the three would toast Edgar as the best Republican friend the Illinois Democrats ever had.
He is the mirror image of his nemesis Jack Roeser. Whereas Roeser's position is "a conservative or no one", Edgar's has consistently been "a moderate or no one."
How about my own state senator, Chris Lauzen, who has done nothing for the people of his district. The only issues he seems to care about are little "pet issues of the day" that get newspaper headlines. But when it comes to the big issues, he tends to magically disappear. His idea to implement a Kentucky-like honorary colonels program was one of his entertaining low points.
Down to Blago or Birkett? Birkett - tainted with the death penalty stench of Jim Ryan's false prosecution of Rolando Cruz merely to forward their political careers, wants to keep wasting my tax dollars to try Dugan for murder (even though he already is in jail for the rest of his life), and covers up for his currupt DuPage friends. Should make the top of this list if not for our winner...
Blago!!! Has done such a terrible job as governor that it will take a long time for this state to recover. Makes the JRyan/Birkett stench smell like roses. Has alienated loyal Dems such as myself so that we're voting for JBT in Nov (even GOP'ers remain loyal to Birkett). Hands down, no contest, this guy needs a one-way ticket to elsewhere.
I demand a recount.
Regards,
Dan Proft
Although I understand your dislike for Blago, do you really feel that he ranks at the top of the corruption ladder? He seems to me like business as usual. One more bad gov. Big deal. We've had a series of them. I don't give the guy enough credit to rank him with the really foul. He's not that smart.
Birkett is a different matter. Having a role -- even a minor role -- in knowingly send an innocent to death row is personal corruption beyond anything that Blago could consider. Blago is a bad guy, but I don't think even he would stoop that low.
This includes Rich who thrives on the ability to provide insider information for payment.
The reason so many people oppose Oberweis is that they fear him knowing that he is the only one who, if he ever got a chance, would blow up the culture of corruption in Illinois.
Obama will not support legislation to pull out of Iraq because he passed constitutional law. Such legislation would be worth the same as the guvs promise to clean up state government. The president is the Commander in Chief and Congress cannot force him to pull out of Iraq by resolution.
Oh yes, they can! The Congress has something call the power of the purse. It can cut any military operation off at any time, if it so wishes.
You seem to be under the mistaken assumption that the president's role as Commander in Chief of the armed forces--NOT C-in-C of the country--gives him unlimited authority in national defense and foreign policy. Wrong. This is false on its face--the Constitution specifically gives the sole power to declare war to the Congress. Seems to me that they're quite heavily involved in defense and foreign policy after all.
We are a nation of laws; no man is above the law, even the president (which is why he should be impeached for repeatedly, brazenly, openly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment, to say nothing of the laws against torture, lying to Congress, and illegally reappropriating funds without Congressional approval).
His choke hold on Machine power in this state is completely intentional.
Anyone who craves power as much as he does should never have it.
I was indeed reluctant to put your name. In fact, I think I'll cede to your recount and voluntarily pull your name.
Heaven knows if your clients didn't want you turning your sights on their opponents, they wouldn't call you.
And I can't argue that, at least from what I know, Larry Dominick and the crew in Cicero have one of the most interesting, don't-care-what-party-you're-with-just-care-if-you're-good-for-Cicero dynamic going on there.
And if politics didn't have a little nastiness in it, would we even be commenting here?
The most obsessive/compulsive and generally hypocritical as well as obnoxious and self-righteous person in Illinois politics is Doug Ibendahl, with his co-hort Cathy Santos.
Do you refer to a lot of male elected officials as "cute"?
Why did the person have to include a reference to her physical appearance?
Crawl out of your cave. Feel free to attack Lisa Madigan for what she has done (or try to, since she has done a great job) but when you make sexist comments I am going to point them out.
And you all wonder why there is a gender gap.
Great. Now your ranting have made ME tired. Thanks.
Noting Ann Coulter was correct, the democrat will always change the subject when their point is proven false, Obama knows there is no way for Congress to force the end of the war. From a pure theoretical standpoint congress can pull the $ and pass a resolution, but they cannot force the president to bring home troops. Furthermore my astute friend, Obama with his vast intellect can still count. With a majority in both houses, no way does a republican congress pass a resolution with a clear majority hamstringing the president on the war effort.
Obama is a hack and his views are way too liberal, but my original point is made, he is smart enough to know legislation is pointless.
Please point out anything that the man has ever lost? Simon, Daley, Clinton, his own House seat, recruiting House candidates. . .
He's won every time.
He's a winner, and that is what bothers you Joe, isn't it?
I can't say I have ever said a male candidate is "cute" but I know a lot of women who have said that about various male candidates. (oops, must be the homophobe in me coming out.)
Been nice talking to you Skeeter, but I gotta go: the weekend's coming and I hear the call of small, woodland creatures. (Unless, of course, you can get some cute female official to persuade me to otherwise occupy myself this weekend). Oooo, tough choice for a leftie; be sexist and save the critters or be pc and sacrifice the critters.
1. How wrong the attack on Iraq is.
2. How corrupt Chicago is.
3. How corrupt Illinois is.
4. How great Obama is.
Where is his legendary leadership? A senator of his stature should be leading.
Or is he above and beyond all these petty problems?
As far as I can tell, he's in it for himself.
Kiang, WOW, surprising to see such blatant racism in this day and age. Glad to see that rather than hiding under a rock, you're willing to come out and show everyone what an ass looks like.
People don't like Oberweis because he's a horrible candidate with a toxic personality.
He has run several pretty-badly executed campaigns, this latest one netting him fewer votes than his first run for congress. If he and his supporters really want conservatives to have a chance at any success in Illinois, they will hang it up and find a better candidate. He ain't happenin'.... it's that simple.
Do you all really think the Brady people would have voted for Oberweis?! I tend to believe had most of them not had Brady to vote for, they would have stayed home or voted for JBT. The reason they voted AGAINST Oberweis to begin with is because he's such a horrible candidate.
I'm all for rockin' the system. You overgeneralize here, because I'll be the vast majority here would like some serious changes in how this state works as well - more than just party changes. But to "rock the system" you first have to win, and THEN you have to be able to work within the system to make real change. Oberweis could NEVER have done that even if you're dilluted enough to believe he could have beaten the looney in there now. He would have probably done more to propel Blago to the national stage than Blago will ever be able to do on his own by way of a huge re-election win.
Your persistence in believing that anyone not for Oberweis is FOR corruption is simply ridiculous. Maybe eventually you'll learn that insulting all who don't agree with you is not a key to winning votes and elections. Your fearless leader certainly hasn't learned that.
gotta go with Gov. Hair-Job, he's done far worse then Jack, I don't think Jack can dot the damage Blago's done.
So my vote Gov. Hair-Job
Mea Culpa.
Of course everyone is right about Deputy Governor Bradley Tusk. He is part of the screw-ups in the Governor's Office, but like my manz pointed out above, it ultimately lies on Rod Blagojevich he gave him the job as his right hand man and he came from New York!
Was there not anyone capable or qualified to be Deputy Governor in Illinois?
Obie doesn't need to be banned either, he's never won, nor done, anything. The voters have banned him.
People who should be banned are obstructionists to progress in government and in the business only to enrich themselves, like the Shaws, Chicago Aldermen Matlak and Burke and for good measure throw in Congressman Jerry Weller.
Gutierrez's motto for his Mayoral race will be,"See what I've done for my District and that's what I want to do for Chicago!"
But if if I had to vote someone off the Island of Illinois Politics, my choices are:
1) Rosemary Mulligan -- good on some issues, but the most vindictive and petty person under the dome;
2) Both Roesers -- they would have been great politicians during the Spanish Inquisition;
3) Bernie Stone and Burt Natarus -- I'll refrain from making jokes about senility;
4) Brad Tusk -- the guy's smart, but come one: put any 30-year-old from out of town in that position, and you'll have a real problem with arrogance and unwillingness to reach out.
If you want to find the biggest source for why many schools are getting worse, wages are stagnant, unemployment is still too high, businesses are moving out of the state, prison populations are soaring, elections are anti-democratic, pensions are out of control and bankrupting our children, mental health sufferers' only option is prison, we have Blagojevich as the supposed best Democrat to lead us as Governor, and no hope it sight to get rid of the patronage protection and corruption running rampant, look no further than Michael Madigan's stranglehold on his party and Illinois. Michael Madigan should be a no-brainer for everyone who wouldn't vote for a yellow dog on the ballot as long as the dog were a Democrat.
2nd would be Jim Edgar just so they'll shut up about running him every time their other choices are again horrible.
Prediction:Guttierrez will not run for congress , not because he wants to retire, but because the majority of the hispanic community is on to him and his double talk about representing us, but truely just pimping for the developers and selling out his community to gentrification!!!
Durbin makes Pelozi look like John Wayne.
My vote: Taliban Dick
anon 10:36
"People don’t like Oberweis because he’s a horrible candidate with a toxic personality".
I couldn't agree with you more. As a Christian Conservative, there is no way I would have supported NObeone. He is a horrible candidate.He does not represent the real christian conservatives.
Actually I do feel better showing up ugly racists for the ignorant morons they are. His post was so offensive, in fact, that Rich removed it. So thanks.
Nobody mentioned George Ryan either? Probably because they are counting on him making the vanity plates that they have always wanted while he is away on his vacation.
beam me up Scotty
No Ibendahl Fan: How about Jon Zahm?
Vanilla -- you have no credibility.
Trigg - I don't know why you want to blame Mike Madigan for everything, but you obviously know nothing about the man. He's only been state party chairman for 7 years, and quite frankly, there wasn't really anybody else competing for the job. You can't blame him for Blagojevich, either. Madigan's only mistake there was not getting involved in the Governor's race in the primary. He certainly had nothing to do with the fact that Blagojevich beat Vallas.
And the reason that wages are stagnant and manufacturing has left Illinois, is corporate greed, George Bush and GOP trade policies, not Mike Madigan. Mike Madigan didn't force Whirlpool to close it's doors in Herrin and put 1000 factory workers on the curb, it was their unwillingness to pay a fair living wage for a fair days work that did that.
"4) Brad Tusk  the guy’s smart, but come one: put any 30-year-old from out of town in that position, and you’ll have a real problem with arrogance and unwillingness to reach out."
The age-old problem: OLDER arrogant folks who don't like the younger arrogant folks.
By the way - when you mention Bradley Tusk, you out yourself as an insider. You lose your objectivity in my mind.
That's just an FYI.
OMG, I'm an insider!! I'm sure that it's shocking that readers of this blog are also involved in state government in some fashion.
As for your suggestion that I'm an arrogant older insider . . . well, I'm not that old, but I am old enough to know that power would go to my head at age 30.
I'm also old enough to recognize youthful arrogance when I see it.