-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/11/09/question-of-the-day-428/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Having since moved to Springfield and taken up reading the SJ-R, I do believe they go a little too easy on certain city and county officials.
Kass is always pounding Daley. Many of his insinuations and inferences go way over the top and are not based on fact but rather speculation. I'am not a great fan of Daley, but I recognize the difficult job he has, and given the circumstances he has done a decent job.
Kass is a poor imposter for the late Royko!!!
Locally, the papers hated my state rep until say...August or July.
Yup, The good old boys at the Tribune.
My neighborhood paper hated Alderman Matlak, and rightly so. It was in love with Waguespack the aldermanic candidate, but I haven't see much reporting on Wags the Alderman.
It is pretty balanced on Manny Flores, though. Sometimes praises him, sometimes goes for the throat.
Unlike the Trib, the foreign press described the mood in the court room while Jim testified. He was embarrassed and hostile at times - not the confident, sanctimonious man we have all come to know and love.
If Jim's testimony were to be believed, the hot-shot former federal prosecutor and former governor got hoodwinked by some greedy scoundrel. Black's attorney made Jim look like an overpaid, incompetent fool.
I think the bias at the PJS is two-fold. First, Schock is what passes for celebrity in Peoria, so he gets the celebrity treatment. Secondly, the paper's political coverage and their editorial board took a turn for the worse after their corporate buy-out.
I doubt they'll ever recover.
The school girl-crush that PJS has on Schock was cute when he was debating specialty license plates or some other small potato business, but this is Congress, diplomacy, international relations. Kind of a big deal, might want to do some real reporting over there.
The Peoria Journal Star "might want to do some real reporting on Congress, diplomacy, international relations."
Any reporter who could do "some real reporting on Congress, diplomacy, international relations" would't be hanging around a berg like Peoria or Springfield.
To their credit, it isn't that they are biased against all Democrats or all Republicans, it is that they are biased against certain politicians, and biased in favor of certain politicians, some of whom are D's and some who are R's.
Even when they are biased in favor of your guy, it doesn't feel right.
Certain reporters in the Chicago Sun-Times only report the vague & less critical stuff of certain candidates, but the more critical and personal-side of other candidates (i.e.-- Clinton and Obama).
I've also seen in The Star paper poor coverage of local elections. I remember during last election cycle when they endorsed their candidates for the election, they didn't do any background on ANY CANDIDATES. They said they only endorsed candidates who "reached out to them." Since when does a candidate "reach out to a paper" and say "Pick me!"??
These papers are skewed to the personal preferences of the reporter... and these ELECTIONS ARE TOO LONG.
All three of the GOPers in the Race to RePlace (hey that sounds cool)are for the war so what diference does a few more nukes make?
Clearly there is a bias, but I think its mostly towards incumbents as YDD suggests.
I think the locals crave good sources and interviews, so they tend to give the incumbents favorable coverage to not risk being cut off. I noticed the same thing in the Daily Southtown and Daily Herald, they tend to favor incumbents with coverage.
Suggestion to the SJ-R: if you're going to have an interactive "comment" section, it might be good to update the comments more frequently than every 2 hours.
Wasn't like that "back in the day" (just a few years ago).
Their plunging circulation numbers should be telling them what a mistake they've made. It now looks like a minature Sun-Times without any substance concerning Lake County.
This can be verified by the 'endorsements' made by the papers during the election cycle. It takes something extraordinary for them to oppose an incumbent. Additionally we also have a gender bias going as well. Females are looked at with far less scrutiny/scepticism than the males and they are frequently allowed the excuse as Hillary tried to use recently that the 'boys' are being mean to me.
The Quincy Whig endorsed George Ryan and Blago. You'll never see any negative Blago stories as long as they think he will help them build another road.
One of the journalism trade magazines a while back had a good feature on resources devoted to state government coverage. The winner, by a significant margin, was Florida, where one paper alone, the St. Petersburg Times, had nine reporters in Tallahassee. As I recall the total across all papers was something like 40-50.