-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/07/07/question-of-the-day-123/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
If Daley is talked into running again, he will be reelected.
Think about it; if Stroger can be bedridden and reelected, Daley can be under investigation and reelected.
The better question is, if he doesn't run, who the candidates are. You'll need your black, latino, old-guard, reformer, and gadfly slots filled in the beginning, and watch them whittle down from there.
He has too. The blood is in the water now. Sharks are out. He has to run to hold off the chaos that breaks out if quit. But it's a lost cause and there is more blood to flow for sure.
Chicago will be a big loser from it all because the only kind of way it can govern itself is with these dynasties.
I don't see a H. Washington out there either (But then I didn't see the real one the last time either.)
The period 'Pax Chicagorum' fostered by Daley's benevolent dictatorship has produced a very long trough, where everyone is sharing nicely. This period has been marked by a downtown renaissance: Millenium Park, Navy Pier, Northerly Island, iron fences, etc.
Remove old man Daley from the equation, Chicago is going to regress back into factions fighting over resources, tax dollars, power, and patronage, back like it was in the late 70s and 1980s.
read this from today's Trib,
But one veteran Democratic official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, believes Daley could have another problem.
He theorized that grass-roots ward political workers who normally would support Daley may not lift a finger for him at election time after revelations that members of "rogue" political groups fostered by the mayor were richly rewarded with city jobs and promotions.
"A big problem is how precinct captains take this, and I am going to tell you there are a lot of committeemen and precinct captains who think these roving armies were inappropriate and an abuse and, worse, a rejection of their role as legitimate players in the system."
It wasn't all happy campers at the trough in Chicago politics. And look at pictures of who runs the wards and who were the rogues.
Daley will run because he and the rogues have no choice but Fitz will play everyone off against each other and it's a big mess coming.
The US Attorney's office moves deliberately so if Daley is indicted it won't be before the election. I see Daley winning again, but this time with a vote in the upper 50s or low 60s. This will embolden more legitimate candidates to run in 2011, whether or not Daley runs then. The days of Daley getting 80 percent are gone.
Yeah, I think a guy like Daley runs until he runs out of road. He'll go out guns blazing, (metaphorically) thinking that a lifetime of dealing and favors can buy him out of anything.
Hmmm...I gotta go dig out my Paper Lace 45 rpm record...
It's really striking the different reactions that Chicagoans and Democrats have to Daley and Blagojevich. Both men are accused of similar transgressions, but it's going to take much, much more hard stuff to bring down Daley than it would Blago. Daley, at the end of the day, has established a genuine connection with his electorate. People may not approve of all his actions, but they like the guy. Blago does not have the same kind of personal goodwill to fall back upon.
First, he must have a credible opponent. Jackson says he is not running. Gutierrez is less than inspiring. There are a number of current officeholders who could run against Daley and win, but whether any of them has the moxie to do it is another matter.
If someone finds the courage to run, I think they have plenty to run on. Corruption can be made personal: juxtapose headlines about underqualified building inspectors with headlines about collapsing porches and the E2 tragedy.
Education is a double-edged sword: yes, Daley took over the schools, but test scores are abyssmal and the black community is on the verge of erupting over the quality gap between schools in Englewood and Lincoln Park.
The economic development has been tremendous, but most Chicago families have not shared in that prosperity, and Daley vehemently opposes requiring the world's second most profitable company to pay its workers a living wage. At the same time he remains silent about the efforts of Alderman Natarus to squeeze a pay raise for the city council out of tax payers.
It also important to keep in mind that many, many voters were not around or aren't old enough to remember the 80's, so the "He may be a crook but he's OUR crook" argument really doesn't work.
Finally, there is the property tax issue. Voters are angry, angry, angry about it. Daley has talked about property tax relief and school funding, but it's fair to say he hasn't really lifted a finger to fix the problem. It took Daley 3 days to raise taxes to fund Comiskey, 3 days to raise taxes to fund Soldier Field. He's had decades to address the school funding/property tax issue, and a graph showing how city spending and property taxes have risen over daley's tenure would be powerful stuff.
One thing is for certain: with the patronage machine under fire, organized labor will play a very important role in the upcoming election, and anyone who hopes to challenge Daley must earn solid support from organized labor.
Remember the Tribune poll that found Jesse Jackson, Jr. beating Mayor Daley 40-37. That is not reflective of a deep personal connection with the electorate. George Ryan was a genuinely popular guy at one point too, but you'll only let your best friend kiss your wife so many times before you can't ignore it any more. Only time or a good poll will tell whether the voters feel Daley has committed too many transgressions.
Instead of just telling the truth, they made the decision to go to trial to cover for a system that was created by a greedy group of men that will turn their backs on them in a heartbeat.
Today, they must be wondering-what have I done?
Daley owes these guys for playing the good little soldiers. Then again loyalty is a one-way street with Daley.
She'll win and will create a renassance for Chicago for the next 20years and she will build on Daley's Legacy!
Lay off the dope.
Not withstanding the Mayor's politics, I believe the Presidents visit to Chicago at this time was not only to assist Judy Barr Topinka, but also to you his position to assist the Mayor in thwarting any possible future indictment by the U.S Attorney.
I know that may sound off the deep end but check it out:
The President visits on his birthday, should be be at home with his family? During the dinner with with the Mayor and in newspaper articles and news accounts he speaks states that he came to share his birthday with the Mayor of the City of Chicago and then gives the Mayor raving reviews even though the City Hall trial verdict (what a coincidence)was announced and the headlines in the papers tell it all.
However, the same federal prosecutor and special prosecutor is investigating both the White House and City Hall for improprieties. One of the Presidents aids have been indicted and four of Mayor Daley's adis have been indicted as well and the investigations of both the White House and City Hall are not over.
Simultaneous, the Vice-President will be called as a witness in the prosecution of the White House investigation and the President has not yet been implicated. Neither has the Mayor in the City Hall investigation.
Yet, the President is still the "boss" of the prosecutor who is investigating both entities.
It appears that the Presidents persistent statement that the Mayor is his friend is an attempt to warn the federal prosecutor to "back off the Mayor, he's my friend".
Look at it from this angle. If the feds are investigating whatever entity in the United States, as the President of the United States and the overseer of the U.S Department of Justice, shouldn't the President be grateful that the prosecutor is investigating corruption and he should not taking visits to cities and towns to cheer on those who may be under investigation by his own federal administration?
I thought I saw you at the press conference, but then I realized it was your doppleganger Pearson. Won't one of you shave the beard to end the confusion... ;-)
The best candidates might be able to take Daley down in 2007, but the gist I am getting is that 2007 will be Daley's last hurrah. So why bloody yourself to pieces , when an easier race might be had by waiting four years?
Talking polls, the February Tribune poll found that, while 70 percent of those surveyed did not believe Daley's claim that he was unaware of the corruption in City Hall, 56 percent still said they approved of the job he was doing as Mayor. That's a 26-point don't-believe-him-still-approve gap. In any case, a 56 percent approval for a guy who's been around so many years is impressive. I gotta chalk some of that up to goodwill.
You say:
It wasn’t all happy campers at the trough in Chicago politics.
I beg to differ: is there any credible opposition to Mayor Daley? Remember the days of 'Council Wars'? Now *those* were not happy campers.
When "veteran Democratic official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.." are cowering in the shadows in fear of reprisal, that means da mayor has complete control.
The non-happy campers will simply be ignored, or bought off until the are happy.
When I see someone on TV night after night railing on and on about the 'corruption' and putting together a serious ward-based, anti-Daley coalition, then I'll know he is really losing control.
Pull up! Pull up! You're going down! You're getting too close to the flames! AWWWWWWW!!
Too late! :(
I guess one man can make a difference, but one lunatic can't!
Remember the Chicago motto: We take care of our own.
I think Sorich would apprciate that in writing.
To the poster who said the census gives Hispanics a shot at the mayoralty...........get some facts to back up your tune.
Hispanics make up around 15% of the potential voters in da great city of Chicago. That is because of citizenship and age related eligibility issues. They are probably over 35% of the general population, but only potential voters count in an election.
Little Louie does not have the votes and Jesse Junior is disliked by a significant part of the black community. Reverend Meeks? Ain't gonna happen. His right wing social agenda is not going to play in this city. Plus questions about his "love collection" at his church would hurt his credibility. The "love collection" is a special collection his church takes up for him and his wife. Only he and the wife count the money...........hmmmmmm.......no questions there huh.
Face it. Daley is gonna run and win. What is he gonna do...........retire and teach "speech" at the University of Chicago.........
ARRRRRRRRGH
Look for a white liberal with bonafide credentials in the African American community, and who is openly embraced by Obama and/or Jackson. There are plenty of folks who fit that bill.
Names please...names...
Minion - Daley started 2002 with $2.5 million. Between then and through the election, he raised $4.6 million and spent $3.3 million, with $3.7 million left on hand.
Four years later, he's starting 2006 with $2.3 million, which means he has had $1.5 million of negative fundraising over the past four years. Not good. For comparison, in the last half of 2005, he raised only $22,000, compared to $1.1 million in the last half of 2001.
Let's also not forget that our state ethics laws allow Daley to retire and take with him whatever cash he had on hand July 1, 1999 for personal use. Including possible legal fees, or trips to Ireland. I call it the "Magic Number." Daley's Magic Number: $2,593,869.00. Roughly what he started the year with, which means he effectively started at $0.
I'd suggest just the opposite: Daley's political power and fundraising ability depend on the perception that he will continue to hold power, not on a well of goodwill, and he's become dependent on folks who are afraid they will no longer be able to do business with the city or will no longer have a job for his continued re-election.
Every perceived crack in his power, whether it's the passage of a smoking ordinance, living wage ordinance, or foie gras ordinance over his objections; indictment of his subordinates or political allies; or poll numbers which show him trailing potential challenges; they all weaken his ability to raise money, and it remains to be seen whether he can still put city workers on the streets like he used to.
Daley favorites and potential inidivudals to gain his 110% support are,
1. William Daley
2. Rahm Emmanuel
3. State Senator Iris Martinez
4. James Houlihan
5. Ron Huberman
All these 5 men and women would be assured to gain the full support of Daley and his allies and would continue his legacy!!
I say the mayor runs and no one remotely credible even circulates petitions. Like it or not this city is still really balkanized, and in today's TV age in politics, it's damn near impossible to govern such a place w/o #1) a Daley-like record of achievement, or #2) A billion bloomberg-like dollars to blow the other factions out of the media race.
Take a look at the white and black city workers who have joined HDO. Are they doing it to express solidarity with their Hispanic brethren? I don't think so. They are doing it as joining HDO and working for Daley and his favored candidates is a way to dramatically improve their chances for getting hired or promoted. Welcome to modern-day machine politics.