-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/02/07/question-of-the-day-469/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
They poured a small fortune into Deratany and Suffredin's elections and came up with nothing to show for it!
These guys no nothing about grass root campaigns.They think "slick tv ads" (most of which were distortions or outright lies), would carry the day.
They all have placed big targets on their backs, and I hope it comes back to haunt them!
They do not deserve the backing of anybody(voters or the Democratic Party)!
But to say that there is an underreported story regarding the State's Attorney's race AFTER the election begs the real question: Why did the print media abdicate their responsibility to cover this election in the months before the primary. I have never seen such a paucity of coverage by the Sun-Times or the Tribune for a big race. The race was wide open. It was for an important post. There was no incumbent for the first time in 40 years. And yet, neither paper did anything to inform the electorate of the qualifications (or lack thereof) of the candidates.
To my recollection, there wasn't a profile of a single candidate in either paper, unless you include Mary Mitchell's column in which she took a shot at Brookins and blew a kiss at Alvarez. Eric Zorn, the self-appointed liberal "justice beat" columnist not only didn't write anything of substance on the race, he penned a column in which he admitted that he didn't know enough about the candidates a week before the election.
This, bluntly stated, is an abrogation of a newspaper's civic responsibility. The two papers were so busy kissing Obama's starry behind that they ignored the biggest race in the county. This failure could have resulted in a state's attorney who had never prosecuted a case and who hadn't practiced any kind of criminal law in over a decade (Allen) or an anti-death penalty liberal whose lobbying and legal practice was miles away from the Criminal Courts building (Suffredin) or a manifestly superficial scofflaw with no evidence of political integrity (Brookins).
You would think that the editor of each paper would assign their top political writers to the task. Instead, all we got was limp coverage of debates and press conferences and poorly reasoned editorials endorsing questionable candidates who hadn't been vetted by anybody in the press.
An atrocity, really. But they sure are doing a good job of covering Obama.
Madigan may have a supermajority next January if trendlines hold ...
-- SCAM
Okay -- maybe I've overstated my role.
That's a good story and I think Milan did cost Allen the election. And that's a good thing. Allen can go back to worrying about potholes, garbage collection and to his law practice which consists of getting tax bills reduced. Everybody will be better served.
Congressional changes appear to have been greatly exaggerated. The GOP seats being held by retiring GOP Congressmen needed decently successful candidates, and the GOP found them with Baldermann, Oberweis, and Schock. The weakest of the bunch is probably Baldermann because he has shown to be a clumsy campaigner so far. But this Congressional seat is still the GOP's to lose.
Kirk will see a match-up with Seals once again. If Seals couldn't win in 2006 with the anti-GOP fervor behind him, 2008 will likely be a wash as well.
On the Democratic side, Lipinski won easily. The Pera revolution didn't materialize.
Morganthaler and Bean looks fantastic, but once again if Roskam won in 2006, 2008 will be easier.
So on Tuesday, the Illinois primary shown 'more of the same'.
There are those who believe that Obamamania will create new Democratic seats in Illinois. If this was 1956, this could be a distict possibility.
We have not been seeing 'coat-tails' in General Elections for many years. Even if Obama succeeds in getting the nomination and beating McCain, 'coat-tails' are highly unlikely.
So Tuesday's most overlooked story in my opinion is how the Congressional revolution expected for Illinois did not materialize, and doesn't appear to be materializing.
Is there a new wing of the Dem Party that is Not Stroger and Not Jackson/Claypool?
2.) The breakdown of the McHenry GOP - having more Democrat ballots pulled than Republican for the first time in probably 100 years;
3.)Jim Oberweis finally won a race!
Of course, you wouldn't know this if you were reading the newspapers, since I have yet to read a vote total forthe MWRD Board in either the Tribune or the Sun-Times. Talk about disgraceful journalism!
Schock's win can't be overlooked, either. The kid is a very proficient money-raiser and has the makings of a power player. When people talk about the future of the ILGOP, Schock is it, and there's not much to dissuade me from thinking he will run for a statewide office and win someday - and perhaps someday soon.
That could really come into play, especially with Oberweis running for Congressional open seat that represents Kane County & it's 100,000 Hispanics.
As an aside, I saw where Peraica took a swipe yesterday at Alvarex over the $600,000 loan to herself. Peraica should be careful because he has loaned his campaign committee over $1.4 million. Alvarez will easily take in $2 million in donations going forward while Peraica will have to loan himself over $1 million. What has not been reported is that Peraica's money does not come from his marginally successful law practice, rather his wife is extraordinarily wealthy.
Lobbyist overrated as stepping stone to higher office.
The remarkable story in the GOP Senate primary was that Andy Martin convinced over 200,000 Illinoisans to vote for him (or he had the nicest-sonding name). I think 88% of GOP voters think this race is a lost cause, FWIW.
OK the election is over now.You can give it a rest. It is time to start looking for another truck driver to run for the Obama seat in a of couple years.
Claypool, Houlihan and Schakowsky look like bozos. Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., at least won a few contests on Tuesday.
I was including Schakowsky as a "lake front liberal". I just didn't want to take the time to type in her name!
While much has been made of Alvarez's made for TV victory, not much attention has been given to Allen's (1st up on TV) well funded and union backed defeat in the field.
While some considered him to be the "organization candidate" what happened to the organzation?
Alvarez won 11 (Daley), 13 (Madigan), 14 (Burke), 32 (Gabinski), 33 (Mell).
Other than in the 11th, Alvarez margins over Allen in each Ward:
13th-Alvarez 47%-Allen 27%
14th Alvarez 47%-Allen 38%
32nd Alvarez 32%-Allen 27%
33rd Alvarez 37%-Allen 33%
seem to suggest something other than a just a mere coincidence at play here and could indcate a double cross ++ or two took place.
Only Banks and Zalewski/Lipinski were able to keep their people on the reservation, and given the number of public payrollers in 11, 13, 14, 32, and 33, despite the woman/hispanc catalysts, you have to believe that this many people all straying off the reservation in one direction didn't just happen by accident.
While at first blush the tighter margin numbers in the 11th
11th-Alvarez 36%-Allen 34%
would appear to offer some cover; a couple of points of note. Despite two presidential candidates on the ballot with local ties, and higher city and statewide turnouts, the turnout wth respect to both raw votes and percentage in the 11th was about the same as it was in the 2004 Democratic primary.
Despite the Committeeman indicating that he was "staying out of this race" given the tight contest, and the number of choices offered in an "open primary", you would expect to see more ballots cast in this race in a ward that prides itself on both turnout and voting.
The undervote in the 2004 States Attorney's race when they were purportedly pushing Devine over Brewer, yet with almost no campaigning taking place was just 10%.
The under-vote for this tightly contested State's Attorney's race with virtually all the non African American candidates on TV daily in the home stretch, was 18% in the 11th ward.
Considering the under-vote was only 13% city wide, that large of a suppressed vote would seem very highly unlikely unless people were instructed in large numbers not to vote the race at all.
A signifcant under-vote could only benefit one qualified candidate that was different, and stood out from the others; so who could this have been?
The raw vote total differential between Alvarez and Allen in the 11th ward was just 176 votes, and Allen still had 34% of the total.
As they used to say in Monty Python, a nudge is as good as a wink to a blind bat, so even the union households in 11 still do what they are told.
Even in a multi-candidate field in a hotly contested primary, when was the last time that the 19th Ward could not get their endorsed candidate a majority, rather than a very meager plurality? They generated 61% for Vallas in the March 2002 Governor's primary and Burris pulled 21%, so even with two white (albeit male)candidates splitting the vote they held Blagojevich under 18%. You would have to look to the largely unknown Mangieri to find another example of that happening, and the south side Greek mafia was not about to get screwed twice in such a short time.
Irrespective of Milan's popularity there, it appears as though the organization effort was either far less than enthusiastic for Allen when you consider Suffredin, Brookins, and Brewer combined for just under 30% of the vote, or the Committeeman is not up to the task at hand.
If the result there was unintentional, then the powers that be down there may be second guessing the annointed/appointed Committeman's ability to deliver on thier commitments. This could certainly cost them in the bigger picture in the long run, and may not bode well locally in the short run in the event of an aldermanic vacancy.
A (non-rigged)fractious multi-candidate contest for Alderman there could result in a run-off, and given the level of discontent that has surfaced there over the last few election cycles, the last thing they need is to have to spend time and energy on an intramural contest.
I would look for the 19th Ward Alderman ( I can't recall her name) to step down and "retire" before her term expires and not stand for re-election. Given the Committeman's performance in this election in comparison to their historic dominant success for their endorsed candidates, they can not afford to have an open seat primary which requires a run-off election.
I hope for his own sake that Allen didn't sink too much of his own personal money into this race. The rank and file union members who's dues and contrbutions got tossed overboard here wll certainly be none too happy.
All in all; this looks to me like Allen, the loyal northwest side contingent that stayed with him, and the unions were all played like a fiddle here.
The funny part is that those that may have engineered the "safe choice" must assume that they are all just too stupid to figure it out.
If his goofy persona in those now wasted TV commercials is any barometer on his IQ, then they may just be right.
While he may have been "honored to have my vote", despite his tenure in the City Council where you may have thought that he would learn, he may have just been taught a valuable lesson for the first time, and that is that that there is no honor among thieves.
Why are people calling Jesse Jackson Jr a winner? Because his wife won against Beavers? Please.
Jackson's have the best scam going. Daddy supports one candidate and Jr supports another. If one wins their butts are covered. They do it all the time.
This liberal/Jackson faction that planned to take over the City & County just got punched right in the nose.
Good for Alvarez because she doesn't need any of them!
One of the most overlooked things here in McLean county could be that Dems pulled almost as many ballots as Republicans ... that is unheard of here, especially in a primary.
The 50th Ward Committeeman Race with Ira Silverstein creaming Bernard Stone.
The fact that Bill "Dock" Walls ran against Bobby Rush for the U.S. Rep Position in the first District.
The Cook County State's Attorney's Race could've been talked about a little more.
The Recorder of Deeds Office, Ald. Ed Smith worked very hard to try and defeat Eugene Moore.
The fact that Jesse Jackson Jr. endorsed Larry Suffredin but yet Jesse Sr. endorsed Howard Brookins.
Oh also the 7th Ward Committeeman Race with Sandi Jackson defeating William Beavers.
"One of the 35" hit on something that the woefully oblivious trolls who cover suburban politics missed entirely. Bob Schillerstrom tried to prove he was the Boss of DuPage by recruiting and funding candidates against board members who dared to question his miserable administration. Not only did each of his challengers lose, an independent candidate beat one of his most reliable rubber stamp board members.
His "machine" spends nearly $150k on a county board race and can't win? His political operation is as sad as his administration.
Between his board beginning to stand up to his tax and spend, pay-to-play governance, and the rumbles about major conflicts between his law firm and his elected position, Bob is going to have some rough seas ahead.
Cities. 2 years ago when Jacobs was up for re-election Boland came out the day before saying he couldn't support Jacobs. This time he did it in a sneakier way.
Her total lock on the local reporters. A few have gotten plum jobs in the private sector after flattering articles.
That is the story. There is plenty of more revenue to site the detailed public record siting the real story out there. Should be interesting.
Cong Schackowsky
Cong Jackson
Larry Suffredin
Deratany
Petrogal Spyropolous
Ricky Hendon
Rich Bradley
WINNERS:
The Hispanic community
Anita Alvarez
Frank Avila
Eugene Moore
Speaker Madigan
Iris Martinez