-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/16/question-of-the-day-760/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
However if he starts with the Blagoof nonsense starting and stopping the crisis then it is F-
(BTW can anyone explain how the "deficit" doubled in four months?)
Today's "event" in the Bilandic Building should have happened in March. It's June now, and he's just getting started. Not good.
Thank God he spent all that time getting his ethics legislation passed though. In terms of an effective legislative strategy, it was bass ackwards.
Just more political posting and rhetoric.
Rich pointed out before Blago's impeachment and in the days after that recovering from this "perfect storm" was going to be a Herculean task.
Quinn's been Quinn since the swearing in. He hasn't done anything more than anyone expected (to earn an A or B) but also hasn't completely imploded the state (yet -- to qualify for D or F).
As in Blagojeviched, or Blagojeviching
Also, we are no closer to a solution than we were when we adjourned on June 1 at 2:30 in the morning. We knew long before Quinn even took the oath we had a budget mess on our hands. Instead of getting to work right away, here we sit with 14 days left before vets, addicts, kids, etc. are kicked out in the street.
He didn't get his budget passed, he didn't get his ethics package passed and he didn't get his capital bill either. If he would have negotiated and compromised and brought everyone to the table perhaps he might have something to show for it.
I would have given him a D+ last week, but the 4 month contract for Filan was an aggravating factor for me.
He has not made his position on the budget a solid one. He started out with a strong position that here was his proposal and if the GA did not agree with it they had to come up with a better one that would deal with the deficit and cover state operation. He would not accept anything else. Then he backed away from that. He said state employees would have to make concessions over and above what they were making as taxpayers. Then he met with the teachers and told them there wouldn't be concessions. Then he came out with the doomsday budget and threatened thousands of union layoffs. Then he joins the union hotel workers in Chicago in their march against management over fair wages. Now he is asking the GA to come back in session to address the six month budget they gave him. He is hard to take serious when he is all over the place.
He followed Blago, the first governor to be removed from office and pledged to fumigate state government and rid it of all of the Blago appointees. Then he makes the author of Blago's financial plan, which we know was a disaster, his main budget guru.
It's almost as if he has a bet with somebody that he can find more ways to cripple himself than they think he can. He almost brings to mind Jimmy Carter. A good guy with good intentions but terrible advisors and a penchant for stumbling and appearing inept.
Since the end of the legislative session, I'd give him a C-:
Legislative Strategy: B. The easy way out would have been to veto this budget or call it a six month budget, and kick the can down the road. But the Big Easy is usually the wrong choice. By signaling every intent to sign it, Quinn's controlling the momentum.
Message: C. Focusing on cuts to services is the way to go, but I'd focus less on programs that sound like things "for the poor" and focus more on things like college scholarships, elder abuse and child abuse, rape services and domestic violence.
Messengers: C-. Quinn looks good on t.v., but these threats of cuts to programs are MUCH more credible if they come from leaders of the AARP, Illinois PTA, etc., on camera, with Quinn standing behind them.
Targets: D-. Quinn's spending WAAAY too much time in Democratic districts, especially in Chicago, and way too little time if any in Republican districts.
He should have had press conferences at SIU-C, SIU-E, ISU, EIU, WIU and NIU by now announcing cuts to student financial aid and impact on universities.
Pontiac and Stateville should be aware that they're about to be closed, along with every single state veteran's home.
Statesmanship: D? We really don't know what really goes on behind close doors, but in tomorrow's legislative meeting, Quinn should shoot straight and say: "Republicans, you've told us to cut and cut, but you've never said how much or really even where, and I for one am really BLEEPING tired of negotiating with myself. So tell me right now how much you'd like us to cut and where, and how many votes I can count on you for to pass the tax increase that's needed to fill whatever remains of the $9.2 Billion budget hole."
Huge improvement over predecessor in the areas of trying to work with the General Assembly and the legislative leaders and trying to confront long-term fiscal problems. Needs to delegate more.
If Governor Quinn was a fireman dispatched to a five alarm blaze, would he show up with an empty beach pail? Sure, Blagojevich would have claimed there was no fire, but Quinn's approach is embarrassingly amateur. What did this guy do for the past thirty years in government, and the last six as Lt. Gov? Did he learn nothing?
He might have been a refreshing goo-goo back in the olden days, but he appears increasingly out of his league regarding leadership and effectiveness. At a time when Illinois is roasting on an open fire, we don't need a governor who insists on training us on fire dangers.
D-
Either lead, follow, or get out of the way! Fence sitting does not get the job done.
B for not being Blago.
C- for strategy
F for no results in resolving budget crisis.
C-minus overall, but if the fiscal crisis is not resolved without doomsday cuts to human services, then his final grade will be a D-
Not what I expected out of him back in January.
Average, he's not doing superior A, good B, or worse D, or failing F.
So he's not making things better or worse.
But he should have been barnstorming the state back in February when he still had the Blago Goodwill.
If I were his teacher I would not let him sit for the final exam. No budget agreement. No meaningful changes in Blagojevich hires. No other meaningful proposals. It's as if he wakes up each morning and says to himself "Hmmmm, I wonder what I should do today."
It should have been framed as a "Rod got us into this" crisis (even though it is soooo much more than that). He should have been called the four tops in for a weekly dinner at the mansion starting week one. (Topic of discussion: the budget.)
The Rod thing gives everyone cover, throw in some cuts, declare a structural deficit, propose a choice of tax increase OR serious cuts in March at the budget address and start sending out the notices then, not in June.
He should have known all that and acted on it immediately.
Also, if he really cares about the state the way he has always said he does, reelection concerns would have taken a back seat.
D- (and I'm being generous.)
lives in the mansion - A
Hasn't been indicted - A
Plays well with others - B
In all seriousness, Quinn had little going for him in the first place. He is the accidental governor. I thought that maybe all of the enemies that he made 30 yrs. ago would be gone by now, but evidently people have long memories.
His legislative session was an F though. I dont think he has the right people around him.
You just noticing this? lol
For sometimes forgetting the lessons of Blago - D
For having his heart in the right place - A
For administering, assembling a management team and doing the grunt work and negotiating required of a CEO of a 70,000 employee empire- D-
An "F" for faulure to understand that huge cuts and program roll backs, in addition to a huge tax increase are all necessary to plug the budget hole. It would appear that he does not have either the intention or the stomach to roll back programs.
The questions should be, how much are Illinois residents willing to take before they actually do something?
D for not having and implementing an effective strategy to make the case for doing what is necessary to move towards solving the state's problems.
But two things need to be said:
1. The Governor had lots of company in not getting the necessary done. This could include all the Republicans, the Democrats in the House who voted against the tax increase, the Speaker who did not do all he could do to pass the tax increase, and the Attorney General, who has the popularity and the credibility such that her voice in support could have made a difference.
2. The game is not over yet, so the grade is not final for the course.
That's setting the bar pretty damn low.
D-