-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/01/07/question-of-the-day-658/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Until he can quantify his claims, they are without quality.
but Chicago requires a team of Orkin men.
Bill Daley from Chicago said this?
Bill Daley, the son and brother of Chicago mayors?
Bill Daley, Bill Clinton's appointee?
Talk about insulting! If anyone knows corruption on every level of government, it is Bill Daley. To have Bill Daley claim that Springfield is the source of Illinois' corruption is like hearing OJ Simpson claim I am a criminal because I sometimes jaywalk!
Or like having the Hollywood Madam claim that housewives sell out to their husbands.
Or like McDonald's claim that Subway offers fattening food!
Or like Chevrolet Vega owners claim that Toyota builds crap cars!
Or like Pia Zadora claiming that Meryl Streep couldn't act!
There is no Democratic Machine in Springfield, it's in Chicago, and Mayor Daley sends his handpicked cronies down to Springfield to bring the $$$ back to Chicago.
Gov Blago also blamed Springfield when his top fundraiser Tony Rezko was indicted for being the problem. So, it's ridiculous to say Springfield is the cesspool of corruption. I'm not sure why Bill Daley would say something so outrageous.
I do agree that mass media editors do a terrible job of reporting on state government and featuring non-scandelous stories about it. Public apathy is a potential breeding ground for ego driven corruption.
But Bill (Daley, not "our" Bill), where do state officials come from? The movers and shakers all seem to be coming from the Chicago area of late.
Obama was a good government exception who rose above the fray, as some - too few - public officials seem able to do.
Hey, Bill Daley: start a Henry Horner society of able and honorable potential public servants and groom them to run for state and local office. Either party, any ethnic or religious background - just good and talented people, the types that now may choose to avoid public service and elected office because of the taint of Ryan/Blago/too many others to list.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
Please stop sending us corrupted politicians. It has gotten so bad, that I heard Bill Daley claims that we are the source of Illinois corruption.
Thanks,
Springfield - the capitol you refuse to acknowledge
But, assuming he is right, I believe a case can be made that if Chicago and environs quit sending their crooks and corrupt politicians to Springfield, and only sent their squeaky clean politicians to Springfield, we wouldn't have that problem. Right?
Corruption comes from private individulas seeking wealth. The center of commerce and wealth in Illinois begin with Chicago. Various persons an entities, from legitimate buisness, to the mob, to the meat packing plants needed to control various aspects of government to smooth the way for thier acitivities and the accumulation of money. Chicago has been the center of this campain since the 1800's and continues on today. Springfield has corruption, but it was born and thrives in Chicago
Its because to corruption, regardless of government branch, is taking place in northern Illinois
Here's two more: "legislative scholarships".
Was he kidding?
- Anon - Wednesday, Jan 7, 09 @ 12:56 pm:
>If he can convince leaders in Washington that >Springfield is more corrupt than Chicago. His >brother might get federal funds sent directly to >the City of Chicago and not via the State of >Illinois
You hit the nail on the head. The Mayor asks for money, and his brother slams the competition for it.
You hit the nail on the head. The Mayor asks for money, and his brother slams the competition for it
Bill should have listened to his Dad.
Kjellander.
The question is partially addressed in James Knowlan & Samuel Grove's book "Illinois Politics and Government: The Expanding Metropolitan Frontier"
Very good read. A snippet from a review...
This book is comprehensive in its descriptions and assessment of Illinois politics. The Illinois political scene is addressed in early chapters along with a description of the Chicago/Collar County (counties surrounding Chicago)/Downstate triumvirate power structure that dominates Illinois politics. It also focuses on the individualistic mode of governance and politics which is "centered on political influence and patronage."
Your office???
I'd be happy with something along the lines of "our office" tho I greatly prefer "My office."
And do you know who lobbies for Comcast?
That should be your question of the day.
OK, that's two. How about naming a whole lot more to match the Cook County numbers.
As for Bill Daley's comment, consider the source. I know of no other part of the State, politically, that is under the press scrutiny like Springfield. Central and Southern Illinois news media don't go to Chicago to report on their political corruption but you can bet that the Chicago press comes to Springfield to report on the business under the dome. That's a given since "the dome" is in Springfield.
I'm still laughing about this one. And to Bill Daley, we hardley knew ye.
All apologies, roomie.
There's corruption in Chicago. And in Springfield. And in New York. And in LA. And in Baton Rouge. And in London. And in Moscow. And in Ancient Rome......
Anybody read Shakespeare, Gibbon, Dostoyevsky, Kafka, The Bible.....?
Bill Daley's remark is ridiculous, but so are the holier-than-thou protests.
VMan, you can really hear God? Let us know what else he says.
Oxymoron?
To the point about Cellini and KJ there has been no trial or convictions. Nor do I think there will be for these two... Its interesting thats the best anyone can come up with in a comparision which perhaps proves the point that daily is wrong.
Everyone needs a scapegoat, I guess. Thanks for the good government statesmanship of Paul Powell and the Phelps clan.
Are there other forces from outside Chicago that are corrupt - without question, but to say that Springfield is more corrupt than Chicago is just hilarity in its purest form.
He's got to be kidding.... unless it's that same "other world" our governor lives in as well.
Of course, they all get along. It's those darn downstaters that are the trouble.
I suspect, as other commenters do, that this represents a rather clumsy attempt by Bill Daley to divert the national press' attention from Blago and convince Congress to send the federal bucks directly to the city. It also probably signals that he's given up on running for governor as well.
Ha Ha. IL politicians get away with most anything and everything; why can't Daley spin his fairy tales and fantasies?
There are two factors fueling the idea that Chicago is more corrupt. One is the size of the city. The other issue is Chicago is a highly competitive media market. Corruption gets reported for the most part. I don't think that is as true downstate. I can always remember hearing that the State Journal Register had a policy of never writing anything negative about Bill Cellini.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain there!"
God says, "I empowered you people to solve your own problems, so stop praying for miracles!"
Media folks from Chicago, with the exception of a handful that all of us who have worked in Springfield could name, know virtually nothing about state government or politics outside of the Chicago metro area. They come down to Springfield a couple or 3 times a year (something controversial being voted on, end of session etc.), breathlessly shout a question or two at the Governor, file their stories WITHOUT A CLUE.
Generally it has been a joke to us about how much we have to explain to them, but we always had to because they were the big guys, and a stupid story in one of the Chicago papers or TV stations was much harder to unravel, because they were so sure they knew what they were talking about. With the capitol bureau folks, we frequently disagreed with how they reported something, but didn't often think it was because they didn't understand the questions, answers, or stories.
Yes, about Springfield being corrupt.
>... or wrong
Yes, about Chicago not being corrupt.
Maybe the Blagojegeddon will inspire greater coverage of Springfield in the future. It'd be hard to make the case that Illinois state politics will bore audiences now that the governor has inspired comedians from coast to coast.
God told me you would write that.
Thank goodness not all lawmakers, north, south, east or west are "crooked" shysters. Mr Daily, me thinks your medication should be changed.
On the flipside, I can cite a lot of examples in the Tribune and SunTimes going after the Mayor and the City with serious investigative reporting. The Tribune has written a lot on patronage in the City, abuses by alderman, etc. I think it was the SunTimes that led the charge against Ryan's dealings at the Secretary of State.
A a big bucks banker with pockets full of TARP cash, running full page, five figure newspaper ads on their wonderful decision to buy IL short term debt for an extra $20 million profit.
That sure sounds like a good source for finding honesty
SillyBilly go back to filling the ATMs
LE, can't have it both ways. Corrupt politicians from southern Illinois are good because they gave people jobs? One, they weren't his to "give," and two, given those bulging shoeboxes, I bet a lot of those folks had to kick back to him.
My original point is that geography doesn't determine corruption. And I forgot Kenny Gray earlier.
Things that Jim Thompson put Daley's people into jail for were commonplace in Springfield during Thompson's 14 years as governor. In part, because Reagan and Bush let him pick the US Attorneys. Cellini - enough has been said. How about George Mason and the Lottery Building? Thompson's 1976 downstate campaign coordinator being a Xerox employee - and then Thompson exempted copiers from competitive bidding? The selling of State jobs? (For those of you who doubt that, in 1992 AG Roland Burris, using ISP led by Terry Gainer, successfully prosecuted Republicans, winning convictions, in Southern Illinois - Centralia? - for selling State jobs. And the feds, under Bush 41, let the State handle the prosecutions.)
Jim Edgar? With all due respect to the honest people who worked for him, Janis Cellini and Michael Belletire were named unindicted co-conspirators by the federal MSI jury. (And for those of you who doubt that, consult the September 2000 issue of Illinois Issues - http://www.lib.niu.edu/2000/ii0009.pdf - page 20 of the pdf, page 38 of the magazine).
George Ryan? Little can be added.
Sangamon County Republican Party? We'll never know, as the State Journal Register, with Jack Clarke as the Publisher, had a policy that the name "Bill Cellini" could not appear in the paper - unless it was a travel story written by Julie Cellini.
Chicago / Cook County has their crooks - but, per capita, Springfield / Sangamon County has them beat. By a mile.
yeah, because all the stories being used as the basis for impeachment came from where???
I'd like to see Mr. Daley actually follow through with one of his acclaimed statewide bids. Outside friendly confines of Chicago he doesn't seem so great and his business affiliations might dare come into view.
NAFTA ... gee, never heard of it. Oh, but in Chicago he's a great business/political leader. Try selling that line in Galesburg you friggin moron.
As for you personally Charles, I assume you couldn't get into the program. You have some Dana Perino hang up or stalker complex.
PAR interns have pointed out Alexi's bizarre Florida gambling contribution connections, how the governor flip flopped on violent video games from Congress to governor, how the state police tried to hide the NIU shooters gun card info, and so on.
The full-time press corps has been the only group focused on illegal hiring, skirting of constitutional requirements in state spending and the impending budget crash that will doom us all.
I assume your post must have been some kind of audition for the Blago press office, why else would someone be so blatantly and completely stupid?
You are, without a doubt, the dumbest poster of 2009 for thecapitolfaxbog. And rest assured, I'll be looking for someone to top your stupidity. But really, it's gonna take a lot to beat that, something along the lines of blaming the media for Blago's re-election.
Enjoy the rest of the year you tool.
To compare states, I just crunched the recent stats released by Corporate Crime Reporter. It just ranked the 35 most populous states by corruption rate, defined as the total number of public corruption convictions from 1997 to 2006 per 100,000 residents. So the higher the number you get, the more corrupt your state is ranked.
(IL came in #6, behind LA, MS, KY, AL and OH).
Next I looked at these 35 states, and I compared whether or not the state capitol was located in one of the top-five population cities in the state (Springfield falls in at #6, just behind Joliet). I looked to see if your state capitol was in the top three most populous cities. Last, for some states, their capitol is in their biggest city, their equivalent of Chicago.
It's only suggestive, but yes, the smaller (relatively) your capitol town is compared to the rest of the state's population center, the higher on average is the per capita convictions of your public officials.
There are 11 states where the capitol isn't in a top five population city (they are CA, FL, IL, KY, MD, MO, NV, NJ, PA, NY and WA). Their average per capita corruption: 3.414. The other 24 states: 2.73.
There are 12 states where the capitol is in that state's biggest city (those states would be AZ, AR, CO, GA, IN, IA, MA, MS, OH, OK, SC, UT). They average out to a 2.599, versus everyone else's 3.13.
OK, so it's just fun with numbers. But, Daley might be partially onto something. It's a common complaint, after all, that D.C. is a political cesspool because it has _nothing else_ besides politics. The whole city is structured around government. Not hard to see why that could be a corrupting culture on the people who work there.
Maybe we should move the capitol to Chicago, so everyone who works there has more on their minds than just the political merry-go-round...
Gee, who campaigned about six years ago on a culture of corruption and a cess pool in Springfield.
Hmmmm. I wonder who was then arrested in his Chicago home for a conspiracy to sell of Barack Obama's Senate seat, without ever spending a full week in the capitol city.
Keep it up Bill Daley. Perhaps you might want to skip to the final chapter of that playbook you purchased at Rod's fire sale.
Here's a tease, it doesn't turn out well, kinda like all your other alleged statewide runs that ended about the time you realized one trip to Dem day at the State Fair wasn't going to cut it in the primary.
Blago is a just a small fry. Richard Daley is king of corruption and we all need to scream that loud and clear.
I know that I have seen it mentioned lately. (triple digits?)
A lot of potential exists for that already. We have two (soon to be three) well-known hospitals, two college campuses (UIS and SCI/Benedictine), and of course, the Lincoln sites. UIS is growing fast and has the potential to be a really good (and affordable) school. And we have location, along major transportation arteries that provide relatively quick access to both Chicago AND St. Louis.
I think it would be great if someday, Springfield had a diverse enough economic and cultural life (think Boston, Nashville, or Austin) that being the state capital was secondary. It would benefit the entire state if that were the case.
You are right, that would be a logical conclusion. It would be something like what the Brits do, having their capital in London.
I should emphasize again that I don't have any confidence in this theory. My point is only, Daley's assertion isn't ludicrous on its face. The idea of having a diversified capital has been made before; see for instance Kevin Phillips' _Arrogant Capital: Washington, Wall Street and the Frustration of American Politics_ (1995).