-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/10/25/question-of-the-day-195/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Brilliant! Hillarious! Gets it's point across with humor and really paints an ugly picture of his opponent. It is negative in the best way possible.
So far, of all the hundreds of ads across the US, this one has been the best.
The trend has been somber music, a deep tenor voice intoning scandal, while newspaper headlines pour across the screen smearing an opponent. The other trend has been the positive ad with the candidate looking all chipper and pretty, still smelling like Ivory. These ads have been mass produced with (insert name here) appeal. The ads look like political ads have been taken over by ClearChannel. Dull and Boring.
THe Nancy Pelosi wannabe ads about Bean from McSweeney, funny, but useless
The Madigan ad that actually touts her record, best ad so far (although, I am wondering her position on the investigations of the Gov, City Hall of Chicago, Cook COunty, since she doesn't realize the feds are involved).
The "I am not the worst guy in the world" ad by the gov, bad.
The Phil Hare ad is great because someone bought him a necktie.
The Tammy Duckworth Ads with 'Mrs. Tearduct the special ed librarian' are kind of Willie Horton Ads that we Democrats decried back in the day - these one's a just too dippy for words. I hope Tammy beats the pants off of Old Shot-gun Pete, but she really should step away from her svengali - Rahmbus-Cube the Magician!
Obama for Duckworth is good because it explains her position and that she is backing McCain's bill-which undercuts her opponent.
Blago not being the worst person ad is crap. He looks drunk to me.
The rest of the ads are just horrible.
Obama's rebuttal of the Roskam immigration attacks was simple yet powerful.
I just saw the DCCC ad attacking Roskam for his NRA votes yesterday -- it is damning. I'm sure parents in the 6th CD are not amused.
The Michael J. Fox stem cell research ad is the best of the season, but the GOP has made it even better. Thanks to Rush Limbaugh's attacks on J.Fox (I guess after prescribing meds for himself for so long, Rush thinks he's a doctor), the J.Fox ads have been replayed on national news outlets and local broadcast over and over and over again.
Thanks Rush!!
"If our oponents win the world will stop turning, gravity will fail, and the very fabric of the universe will be rent asunder." "Therefore you must vote for us or face the devastating consequences."
train111
The Blago ad "worst person in the world" makes me squirm, it's childish and very annoying.
Best ads: Duckworth's first one showing her testifying in uniform and JBT's ad using Blago press conference footage. The RNCC's ads against Duckworth on immigration have been very good, probably effective too I bet. Kirk's "saved the veteran's hospital" ad is very good too.
Worst ads: Everything from David McSweeney, I know he's desperate but come on Jeff Berkowitz is not "the press" he's an arrogant biased wanna be with a microphone.
Does she have any plans at all???? Who is making decisions in her campaign????
Her only message is I am not Rod. Or I am friends with Jim Edgar.
Well, Judy, we don’t care about them. What are you going to do for us. Im not impressed.
I give the ad a 1 out of 10.
I haven't seen one ad from Topinka where she lays out what she wants to do. I think the Edgar ad would have been better had he said, "I'm fully behind Topinka's plan to .... you can check it out for yourself at her website".
The governor's positive ads at least point out that he raised the minimum wage, wants to do it again, wants a $1,000 tax credit for families with people in college, kept his word on not raising taxes and still won't, etc.
It's easy to disagree with the governor (I often do especially when it comes to he raises money and his use of franking), but he is spending money on getting message out. I just wish he wasn't running so many negative ads.
Worst ad yet has to be the Harold Ford ad that is causing a stiry. What the heck was anyone thinking when they did that? Although I don't really think it is racist, per se, just that it makes the guy come off as a complete lightweight more than anything else. It sort of depends on how the viewer perceives it, I suppose, but I thought it was just making him look like he's not a serious candidate more than anything else.
Keep this kind of stuff up, though, and millions of people will begin calling themselves Independents. Hey, it is working for Joe Lieberman!
Finally, a counterpunch to the 19,000 negative ads that insult the intelligence of the average voter, though I think they should take it a step further and say so:
(i.e., "G Ryan's Treasurer" is an insult to you because you know the two are elected separately, and that the treasurer has no constitutional authority over the budget mess we're now in, if it did she would have cleaned it up by now. He's insulted you with 19,000 negative and misleading ads because he can't find a way out of the financial mess he's created.)
Separately, Rich, any chance there will be a QOTD on recommendations to clean up negative campaigning? I'm sure its been covered before, but while we're getting flooded everyday it could be a good time for ideas (I know I have a few...)?
And Edgar? Big surprise! Edgar supports Topinka! Stop the presses!
The ads this season by the national Republicans against Duckworth and Bean have been repulsive, borderline racist, and the best example of why so few people who don't live and die with this stuff are even interested in elections.
And from what I know of those two and those districts, they don't seem to fit.
He hasn't had much $ for them, but I kind of like the Seals ad where he uses the Kirk/Bush photo and takes it directly to Kirk. Good delivery by the candidate, good selection of issues, specific reason to make a change without being hysterical, personal or unreasonably negative.
Other than that, most of the male candidates appearing in their own ads seem weak. By contrast, Bean, Duckworth and Madigan seem firm, convincing and hit the target.
It's hard to believe these consultants make SO MUCH MONEY and keep delivering SO LITTLE. The same stale images of earnest candidates speaking to demographically balanced auidences, looking pensively into the eyes of people in some obviously staged conversation, strolling through the autumnal splendor of Illinois, etc. Very dull, repetitive, with no edge or humor (except for the Roskam Speedo shot, which if funny in entirely the wrong way).
Because he's going to be the next POTUS if he runs in 2008!
Silly! (just teasin')
Negative ads may be the most effective, but Blagojevich's folks have to be scared to death of what the Edgar ad (combined with another round of negative free press from the Levine indictment) could do to her numbers.
You can ask anyone (especially Democrats) that knows Illinois politics and they will tell you that Edgar still polls way off the charts. He would be absolutely stomping Blagojevich right now if he were in the race. Why do you think they had the big announcement yesterday that he was going to be leading the transition team? It's not because they believe they are actually going to win and are being arrogant by announcing a transition team. Then today this new ad comes out. Topinka is trying to link a vote for her to a vote for Jim Edgar. Considering what she is up against, and that nothing else is working for her, I think it is a pretty good strategy.
As far as other ads, I agree that the Michael J Fox ad is very powerful, but am just pretty much sick of political ads at this point.
If I'm in the Topinka Bunker, looking at the handful of bullets I've got left, the last thing I'd do is waste them to try and put Humpty Dumpty back together again. Damage is done folks, the Blago ads have convinced voters they do not like Topinka.
Instead, spend those precious few resources to finish the job the Illinois media has been doing on Topinka's behalf - amplify the independent and credible news commentary on Blago's weak record on ethics and corruption. Make sure that the voters who don't bother reading the negative newspaper headlines about Blagojevich are forced to read them for 30-seconds on their TVs!
I understand the rationale behind trying to repair the damage done to Topinka's favorability - but that should have started weeks ago. We're in the final push now and there are still plenty of undecided and "soft" Blago supporters out there to be converted to Topinka...Judy's not going to reel them in by running the (now perennial and tired) "Jim Edgar Likes Me" ads...she needs to disqualify Blago.
I think this is a serious miscalulation by JBT and, if she continues to run this spot, could close the door on the slim chance she has to pull this race out of the crapper.
Thanks, I'm well aware what Judy's plan is (I have gone to her website). However, the average voter has no idea and that's how I was looking at her ad. I base that on going through the regular voter activities (watching TV, reading the paper, i.e. not doing things uber political nerds like ourselves do such as come to CapFax) and conversations I've had with non-uber political nerd friends. Topinka hasn't been able to place her solid political ideas out there for mass consumption. Much of this has to do with the fact that she doesn't have the money to do so. That's not a knock against her, that's just the truth. If I'm her and I'm trying to win, I think a gentle reminder from Edgar wouldn't hurt. If she doesn't have enough money to get her message/accomplishments out there, even a large web banner at the bottom might help. Right now her commericals consist of Edgar spots and negative ads.
Also Rudy Giuliani is not a heavyweight in Illinois politics just like Michael Bloomberg's support of Blago is irrelevant.
This one gets my award for best "response ad" (to an attack on Ford, for his not being tough enough on illegals).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTJ80lHw5sk&...
Or his ad Ford ran right after the British terrorism plane gel scare -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmJGnRAQkqQ&...
Slick stuff. Maybe too slick? But they've helped keep Ford in the race, no question.
She puts YouBet Veep "Blinky Jim" on the air after a week of no commercials. Then they spend 8 secs reminding everyone of her negatives.
What a waste. What WAS she thinking?
How many ads is Blinky doing this cycle 15 or 20?
Hope YouBet doesn't mind him being away from the counting room.
And who is that strange looking guy at the end
I thought it might be the Brickhead, but he is a much younger man.
Pretty neat tie they go from the Last Executioner to the Brickhead who want to start the cook off immediately.
Seriously, Rich the best ads have come from the DNC on the DC pervert cover-up.
Oh, wait. Those weren't commercials those were the Hastert-Shimkus-Weller-Palmer exit interviews on the news. There have been so many I thought they were commercials
Why doesn't Topinka just trot out George Ryan too while she's at it, as a way to remind voters she represents the past. Good grief, I just wish these fossils would go away.
Re: "I base that on going through the regular voter activities (watching TV, reading the paper, i.e. not doing things uber political nerds like ourselves do such as come to CapFax) and conversations I’ve had with non-uber political nerd friends."
I don't think people would care so much about politics if there wasn't so much corruption and stuff that needs to be reformed. The people who are into this stuff just plain CARE more (at least that's my theory).
"Topinka hasn’t been able to place her solid political ideas out there for mass consumption. Much of this has to do with the fact that she doesn’t have the money to do so."
Exactly. But at least they take on good ideas from supporters. I sent over an email about playing up how she's going to do more with less money while Rod has been wasting his campaign war chest just because he HAS the money to burn, and the Topinka campaign put something along those lines into one of the campaign manager updates that they send out. I got a kick out of that. Perhaps she should have done what Giuliani has done, which is to wisely solicit ideas from the people on his website. That's the way to win, to let the people have some say and not just large, corporate interests or whoever has the money to throw at them.
But the Levine fun? I can't wait to see it all go down. Yeah, he's got ties to Republicans, but Rod looks like a fool or a liar if he claims he knows nothing at all about the corruption. Who's "asleep at the switch" now, Aquanet Man?
I was watching a John Wayne movie last night titled "The Shootist". The Duke plays J.B. Books, an old gun fighter who is dying of cancer. He lived by a creed that wesnt "I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them."
Given the dirty campaign ads, our intelligence had been been insulted. Our pocket books will be severely wronged when the bill for Blogo's foolishness comes due.
We can't resolve the problem by way of a Colt .45 revolver, ala J.B. Books in the Shootist, but we can cast a ballot for the Green Party.
Anybody is better than Public Official A or the red headed accordian player. Vote for Whitney!
Speaking of Rod, I inadvertently ran into his brother today at a gas station in Chicago. He was putting signs out.
The best ad is the Michael J. Fox ad. Bar none.
Does anyone know why McSweeney always appears like he's looking up at the ceiling?
If Patrick Fitzgerald had been the U.S. Attorney then, who knows how things might have progressed. But it was certainly conventional wisdom among many back then that Edgar didn't run for reelection in '98 because of MSI. Yes I know, he used the "heart trouble" excuse. But that's what people do. "Want to spend more time with family" is the other one.
Bottom line, Edgar is the last guy we need a lecture from about dirty government.