-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/05/30/senate-approves-tax-hike/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Folks: The State of Illinois is deeply in debt, do the right thing, lead the State as we have elected you to do. Stop pandering, please. If you think this one is tough, just wait two years or four, the solution will be even more painful.
N Garrett
N Maloney
N Schoenberg
P Silverstein
N Haine
N Garrett
N Maloney
N Schoenberg
P Silverstein
hmmmm.....I wonder if this has anything to do with congressional seats that might be opening up soon? cough 9th/10th
(Hey, hope springs eternal!)
My basic issue with all of this, is fundamentally I don't think I can trust these guys to be good stewards of my money.
After all of the tricks of the last 6 years to balance the budget to avoid making the hard calls on things. That is my issue. Now my tax bill is going to go up and my property tax bill is not going to go down much.
That is the issue.
Also to be frank Senator Sandoval blaming this all on Bush kind of ticked me off. It showed how a complete lack of understanding of how we got here. It wasn't our fault for expanding government without new revenue, for playing along with Rod's asset tricks, etc....
N Maloney 2003 - Present (Senate)
N Schoenberg 2003 - Present (Senate)
P Silverstein 1999 - Present
My guess (and hope) is that this makes it even less likely that the House will pass any type of tax increase during the regular session.
If 5% is "adult", would 6% be more adult? Would 7% show true leadership and not just a bit of leadership?
Adults who lead families & run companies in Illinois understand that when times are tough, spending needs to be curtailed. In Deep Blue Illinois, spending needs to be increased & unions must be fed.
When 'seniors, children, etc' were 'taking it in the pants' the last 8 years where were you senator. The state could have decided to increase revenues to 'help' those folks then? Did you do that, no you went along with Rod's stupid budget tricks and everything else.
Would a little personal responsibility out of these folks be that hard? I realize they are politicians but give me a break.
Structured Roll Call.
They get to have their cake and eat it too.
Either way, they are now the grownups. All these things need to be done, they aren't unreasonable, etc. If the Ds refuse reasonable demands they are the bad guys, if the Ds accept it, Tom C has shown real leadership and he and his members have forced some very real Republican budgetary reforms onto the process.
I hope!!! but I'm not holding my breath
It's almost enough to make me a Republican. Ok, just kidding. It's just enough to make me a frustrated Dem. Nothing could turn me into an R.
Here is a REAL reform: anyone who votes NO, the cuts come from their districts. Don't want to vote for the revenue? Fine. We start cutting in your backyard, and let your constituents call you.
Ok, but only if you don't have to pay the increase as well....
Real Leadership is taking the tough road and addressing the uncontrolled spending... raising taxes is the EASY solution but the most destructive.
Real Leadership is working to attract manufacturing, trucking, all kinds of business to IL - not scaring it away with increasing taxes. [Why are businesses fleeing CA and moving to NV and TX ?]
Real Leadership is spending responsibly, less than what is taken in and building up reserves during good cycles and then living off the surplus during the bad cycles. If that leadership screws up and fails to manage our tax money, it is THEIR job to correct their errors and cut. Much of what they spend our $$ on is NOT in the state or US Constitution - but rather than take the tough route and cut those programs, our leaders are voting to punish us. If only WE could just vote ourselves pay raises instead of cutting our own personal budgets during tough times....
If this passes both houses, there will now be no political reason to get rid of the "prevailing wage" theft from taxpayers through overpricing public works construction.
There will be no incentive to take the necessary steps to get Medicaid back to fair and reasonable income limits (about double the poverty rate instead of the "Blago" 400% of poverty level), saving about $2.6 bilion per year.
There will be no incentive to switch to a high quality managed care Medicaid system that encourages lower cost preventative medicine instead of having recipients go to a pricey emergency room for a case of the sniffles. A good managed care program costs about half the "fee for service" cost, but it's harder for the GA to stiff a big managed care firm like the they do for a large group of "small potatoes" providers.
With this tax increase the GA won't even attempt to limit education salaries and benfits to a sustainable rate of growth through prohibitng school boards from approving increases they can't fund without hurting the kids. A fair limit for increases would be about 70% of new, unrestricted revenues, about the current ratio for school salary and benefit spending.PTELL virtually ensures at least a CPI increase every year even with such a restriction.
With this new tax burden, there will be no incentive to create a fair pension program by ending those "end of career" sweeteners like including unused vacation and sick days in the pension calacution. The recently released former Wheaton 200 Super got a 185 vacation day "bonus" to fatten his pension. The four year cummulative 6% raises prior to retirement virtually mandated by the state will continue to unfairly inflate pensions by about 16%.
175,000 Illinois jobs were lost during during recent national "boom" years. This job exodus, as well as the net loss of 735,000 citizens over the lasy decade, will accelerate from these new taxes.
The expansion to include services will likely also cause a big good paying job migration in engineering, high tech, and financial consulting industries. We just can't compete in what is already a competitive market against state income tax exempt Texan, Nevadan, and Floridian tech firms with the additional burden of corporate and sales taxes.
Job killing tax burdens on service industries, lower overall income from a tax induced economic contraction in Illinois, elimination of urgency for fair reform of education, pensions and healthcare.
No economically informed person can call the passage of this tax increase anything but another step towards making Illinois the next Michigan.
What will all those of you feeding at the state trough do when there's no one left here to generate private sector income?
It's the only bill that addresses the structural deficit by expanding the sales tax base.
Why would any legislator want to go thru this agony again?
Schnorf is right about Meeks, but he forgot to mention Ralph Martire .
If there were more Democrats like Bond, Schoenburg,and Garrett in the Congress, Obama's economic program would be dead.
I suspect you can't argue with that one either! ;-)
Here's a better idea...let's not raises taxes on the people in the districts where the legislators voted no.
Where's Maxwell Smart when we need him?
You people really amaze me. You think that money simply grows on trees and services pay for themselves. That doesn't happen in the private sector, and it doesn't happen in the public sector either. There is no free lunch. Duh. Think the private sector can run government services better than the government? Come to Chicago, where I live, and see how that has worked with the parking meters.
Try this on for size. i thought it was obvious, but maybe not: government exists for a reason. Government services are provided because they are demanded by a segment of the population. Government doesn't just run in and start programs that aren't needed. You wanted roads? The government built them (with state and federal dollars). Jails to lock up the criminals? Government built them. And guess what? It costs money to run them.
hate to rain on your "give me everything but don't make me pay for it" parade, but that is what it is.
As far as Texas and Nevada go, I hope they like Fresca, because they've about exhausted their fresh water.
From World Business Chicago:
Intermodal Container Handler
• World’s #5 intermodal container handler (after Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai and Shenzhen)
• #1 in Western Hemisphere
• Chicago handles 13.98 million twenty-food equivalent units (TEUs) or intermodal freight
• More than LA/Long Beach (LA & Long Beach combined = 13,101,285)
• 4 times as much as NY/NJ
I never knew that Chicago was the #1 intermodal container handler in the ENTIRE Western Hemisphere. You've mentioned other interesting facts about the Chicago economy and how big it really is, which I had no idea about.
I also remember catching the Illinois segement of the History Channel's series on "The States" a couple of years ago, which said that we are actually the state MOST representative of America at large in terms of population, rural/urban and industrial/service/agricultural mix, and economic base.
Too often I come away from reading blog posts convinced that we live in a hopelessly corrupt hellhole with no economic future. Of course there is a lot that can be improved but it helps to remember the economic advantages we DO have which aren't going to be erased by budget cuts, a (reasonable) tax hike, or both.
http://nalert.blogspot.com/2009/05/has-economic...
Out of the nation's 100 fastest-growing counties, the majority were in Texas (19), Georgia (14), North Carolina (11) or Utah (nine), according to U.S. Census figures last year. Raleigh-Cary, N.C., and Austin-Round Rock, Texas, were the nation's fastest-growing metro areas, registering growth rates of 4.3 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively. Both high-tech centers, the two metros are also sites of major college campuses that helped cushion them.
You can't say that about Illinois counties by and large.
Also, Steve, you might be missing one of the major points of the article you quote, which is that the rapid growth experienced in many parts of the Sunbelt for the past 30 years or so proved to be unsustainable for various reasons.
Farther down in the article, another pundit points out that infrastructure, education, and the quality of public services are also factors individuals and companies consider when relocating, not just tax rates alone.
My point is that a balance needs to be struck. A long-term solution to our budget problems cannot rely exclusively on budget cutting to the point of gutting infrastructure, education, and other public services, nor on taxing our way out of the hole with no thought given to whether certain programs are truly necessary. While low taxes do encourage economic growth, they are not the only factor to be considered.
Why such a low corporate increase in the Senate bill. It could be much higher in tandem with a personal income tax increase. As I predicted, the corporate interests and the wealthy may well be among the winners here. I guess those corporate campaign contributions paid off.
The electorate is going to expect a sharper, cleaner government in exchange for higher taxes. If I were Springfield, I would start issuing press releases re: fraud, overpayments and collections.
The taxpayers will want to see that their $$ is resulting in some cost-savings.
There is nothing in HB174 that makes this bill temporary.
Thank you. We won't forget it!
I think a lot of the economic anxiety here stems from a couple of decades-long factors that have nothing to do with state government: The rise of cheap-labor manufacturing overseas and the shift of agriculture from a labor to a capital-intensive enterprise. Fewer good jobs in both sectors as a result.
Steve makes a great point about Austin and Raleigh. Our universities, but both public and private, need more resources and need to be a bigger focus of any state economic development efforts.
Case in point:
Marc Andreasen, Eric Bina and the whiz kids at the National Center for Supercomputing Application in Champaign basically invented the Internet (sorry, Al). That's a public/private partnership that includes the university, the state and business.
When the commercial application of the WWW became apparent, four of those kids started a company in an apartment in Bucktown called Neoglyphics that ended up designing websites for scores of Fortune 500 companies.
It grew to have two floors of an old cash register factory in the neighborhood and employed about 300 whiz kids before they were swallowed up a bigger company (I did some marketing work for them back before they were soldl).
Some of those U of I "kids" then went on to found Orbitz.
Legislators and state government overall need to see our universities as more than places to score football tickets or get some precinct captains's kid with a low SAT enrolled.
As long as a deficit exists I believe every last penny of their political campaign money should be confiscated and applied to pay down the deficit they created...then lets see if they can find a way to trim the budget!
{Illinois is an incredibly wealthy state blessed with natural and geographical advantages. Like you said, it’s economy virtually mirrors that of the U.S.}
But plagued by a dysfunctional government steeped in "tax and spend" ideology enabled by both major political parties, coupled with a corrupt political culture from Waukegan to Cairo, and many points in between.
I am sure that Boeing is re-evaluating how it missed some of these finer points in their re-location analysis every day. When companies like Caterpillar and ADM, along with United, State Farm, Allstate, and many others start to weigh the costs and benefits of being here and begin to realize how the scale is tilting in a new direction, their collective leadership could easily begin to count their blessings as they pack up and leave.
The FASB pension reporting requirements forced corpratios to recognize and deal with a significant problem because institutional and individual shareholders could quickly do the math (and would/did). They knew this would be reflected in their market cap and valuation based on several different metrics. The government leadrship has counted on the indifference of a carefully cultivated apathetic electorate to ignore the same actuarial information that a loser scrutiny of the GASB pension liability requirements has offered to them.
While "Joe Six-Pack's" (with apologies to Ohio's famous Plumber), retirement benefits were adjusted; at least for new employees going forward, to reflect these realities. The same can not be said for government workers.
If the stake-holders (tax-payers) read the Annual Report ( State Budget) with the same scrutiny that they did their Prospectus' and quarterly SEC filings and subsequent 401K statements and saw the kind of structual deficit and grosss mis-management, misfeasance,malfeasance, and breach of fiduciary duty that has been consistently inflicted upon them by "management" in government here, why would anyone chose to invest here?
The future out-migration of population; especially the young, newly educated, and employable will soon have Illinois looking much more like Pennsylvania than any of the growth states, that will be receiving our best an brightest going forward.
Those of you that are parents; who grew up here, and value all that Ilinois was, and could be, are going to be woefully disappointed when you are faced with the painful reality that your kids; and grandkids, are not only not coming back here because there is nothing come home to, but at the same time they are sticking those of you that chose to; or had to stay, with the tab for the cost of the nept and corrupt government which you have sheepishly and collectively enabled.
The editorial pundits keep bleeding (red) ink through their old media print publications in the hopes of awakening a sleeping electorate with a clarion call to action. What they fail to recognize or acknowledge is that they are first speaking to an ever shrinking audience that no longer embraces their format. In addition, of the few remaining hold-outs might be nclined to read and understand the bigger picture through their medium, are simply no longer here to read it, or are far too busy plotting their move out of here to take the time to do so.
Irrespective of their personal ideology, Illinois has been hamstrung by an electorate hopelessly blinded by "party loyalty" in the mistaken belief that the entrenched leaders of either of the two major parties, and the people they nominate, slate, and subsequently limit our choices to elect, are actually representative of our own core values and beliefs.
What llinois desperately needs instead is first and foremost an independently elected Governor, beholden to neither group of myopic apparatchiks, that is inspiring enough to get the regular consistent elecorate to disconnect the auto-party voting mechanism and take the risk of installing them. At the same time such an independent leader would have to be able to motivate enough new voters to come back to the process that have heretofore just given up hope and surrendered themselves as perpetual victims of the "government they deserve" They have to realize that by no longer voting in such large numbers, that they have let a vocal minority of people, led by a simple majority of that minority, to hijack the process of ruling over them.
Innovation and technology have provided the alternative remedy to this problem for both employers and employees alike, and those people have been, and will continue to instead vote with their feet by leaving Illinois; for good.
It's time now for QTS to climb down off of my soap box and go to church, where I will pray for us all, the atheists and agnostics included.
I may tune in later; if I think that a healthy (and yet sill no doubt over-sized) brunch has sufficiently steeled my stomach for from I am afraid that I will be subjected to seeing here as the budget deadline rapidly approaches and then quickly disappers in the rear view mirror of what we will eventually wake up to and be forced to look forward at (instead of to) tomorrow.
While I agree that the state needs to straighten its fiscal house, there has been a lot of trimming and refining over the years. I would love to know where the "straighten up first" commenters would cut. I know places that have been cut too far; most especially the DNR field operations and IDOC CO staff. But, aside from the campaign workers parked at various state agencies (actually not that much $$ in the grand scheme of things), it is not clear to me where significant savings are to be had. (And don't suggest the pension plans, because the state contribution is only a shade over what the employer SocSec contribution would be and they never make it anyway.)
That's a true straw man. There's no evidence that any of this is happening. Is ADM going to move to Nevada?