-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/06/06/steele-likely-stroger-replacement/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Terry Peterson has taken on CHA - that should be enough for any man - and worked miracles in improving the lives of so many.
Terry Peterson is a hell of a guy.
Claypool doesn't have a chance. He's white.
Daley needs the black vote for re-election.
Stroger Jr. is unacceptable. Completely unqualified.
The only virtue of choosing Davis is to get him out of Congress -- to digress, this should be the next poll question: "Can Danny Davis do more damage in Congress or as President of the County Board"?
Peterson doesn't want the job.
I am still not convinced of the qualifications of Dorothy Brown. There has been improvement there, but nothing dramatic.
Steele is my choice.
One final note: I am not a fan of Jesse Jackson [I consider him a moth -- he is always there for the camera lights], but I must give credit where credit is due. He stepped out in front on this one. He did the right thing.
Mike Quigley for President? Come on. Didn't we hear this before. Remember when he announced he was running and then said that under no circumstances would he get out of the race? What happened? He had no support and heard rumblings that people were looking to take him out of his commissioner's seat. He folded like a pup tent. This proves that he is a coward and a liar. Claypool lost because Quigley became his campaign manager. In the Southland, people hate Quigley. Look and Claypool's numbers south and east of 55th and Western. If the Dems were smart, they would fill the interim spot with someone who will beat the Republican candidate (whoever that is).
False--Quigley had far more than he needed to qualify. I was one of his petition gatherers, so I should know. As for "mucking up" Claypool's campaign--you mean the campaign that came closer to knocking off one of the most powerful politicians--and political organizations--in all of Illinois than anyone ever has before?
Look and Claypool’s numbers south and east of 55th and Western.
Talk about a red herring: south and east of 55th and Western is JOHN STROGER'S DISTRICT. Of course Claypool wouldn't do well there. How gullible do you think we are, Anon?
As for Quigley, no candidate says they're dropping out until they actually do--otherwise any leverage they have disappears. And as for "rumblings that people were looking to take him out of his commissioner's seat," the last time anyone tried that, Quigley crushed them at the polls. No real surprise then that he was unopposed this past March and is unopposed in November.
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS  In a follow-up to an April 2005 investigation, the Better Government Association (BGA) and the Resident’s Journal have found that the 17th Ward Democratic Organization continues to receive a suspiciously high amount of its funding from Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) contractors....The only connection between the 17th Ward and CHA contractors is Terry Peterson, former 17th Ward alderman and currently the Chief Executive Officer of the CHA.
More here.
How about throwing a bone to outgoing Carl Hansen for 135 years of service.
False–Quigley had far more than he needed to qualify. I was one of his petition gatherers, so I should know. As for “mucking up†Claypool’s campaign–you mean the campaign that came closer to knocking off one of the most powerful politicians–and political organizations–in all of Illinois than anyone ever has before?
He almost did it? Stroger just suffered a Stroke and he still go spanked. i wish he would've won, but he wasn't even close.
That's the ones that actually voted. Most stayed home because Claypool was so inspiring.
The fact is, after Stroger's stroke, Claypool pulled his hard-hitting ads and recorded a new one expressing sympathy for the president's health while maintaining it was time for a change in leadership. Three months later, with the county adrift and massive problems still looming, can anyone honestly argue that a change in leadership isn't LONG overdue?
Oh why ,Oh why are there no hispanic poltician being mentioned.Is it because they are so insignificant? Can someone tell me why?
Find a new source. The idea that Quigley would turn to Madigan for help, or that Mike "Mr. Democratic Machine" Madigan would help upstart Quigley (regardless of his machine beginnings) is laughable.
Just look at how many votes came out of Quigley’s home ward. It was pathetic.
Claypool received almost 83 percent of the vote in Quigley's 44th Ward --the second highest vote percentage for Claypool in the city, second only to the 47th ward, his own base. How much better was Quigley supposed to do?
Claypool cannot be the nominee because he lost the primary.
No one can be an interim president unless a vacancy exists.
The only one who can declare a vacancy is John Stroger.
The board has no authority to remove the executive.
Stop dreaming up scenarios. Until Stroger says he will not be the nominee, the Central Committee cannot choose someone else. Unless Stroger says he will not be the President the Board cannot choose someone else.
There are no other rules. There are no other choices. Most of what you read is wrong.
Claypool Camp--it would not have been "mean" for Claypool to make legitimate criticisms of poor management and fiscal policies. The ads I received from him, however, simply LIED about County property tax levies. The second one cited a 1995 Tribune article as the source for the assertion that Stroger has raised the levy 10 times--most of those times occurring after 1995. Since the County's levy has been flat for several years, and Claypool has been a commissioner and has complete access to that information, and in fact should be well-versed in it, I could only conclude that this was an attempt to appeal to wealthy white northsiders who don't like property taxes. That was the moment he lost my vote.
Please don't demonstrate your complete ignorance for the world to see. You are absolutely wrong. Feel free to actually read the state statute.
1. Nothing would prohibit Claypool from serving as Acting President while Stroger is incapacitated. Claypool cannot, however, serve as the party nominee.
2. The County Board has express authority under state law to name a successor in the event of the incapacity of the President. 55 ILCS 5/2‑6003.
So, in summary, Wow - stifle or get a law degree.
Signed,
A Real Lawyer
Peter, old sock, would it not be mete for the director of CHA to find contractors building affordable housing for relocated former residents of 'the jets' in the 17th Ward where such housing projects for poor people are afoot?
Seems so.
Alas, my unburnished steel offers this quid nunc:
It is not the task of the President of the Cook County Board to 'clean up' Cook County; rather, to serve as the executive of that gathering of worthies. Peter, Peter, Peter; men speak to one another like men and not school girls.
I have no doubt that you are unable to read the last post.
To cite but one example, "mete" is not an adjective, despite your use of the word as that part of speech. The Oxford English Dictionary--pretty much the final word when it comes to the English language--lists two noun and three verb definitions for "mete," but no adjective definitions. If the OED has no clue what you mean, I sure as hell don't.
It is also obvious that you didn't understand the BGA's press release about Peterson, in which it is quite clear that the contractors making donations to the 17th Ward Democratic Organization have NO CONNECTION WHATSOEVER to the ward except that it is the home base of Terry Peterson. Again: NO CONNECTION.
Mete - OE. used as a verb transitive or noun.
Safire? You read Safire? De Gustibus Non est Disputandem. For you - Non homo sed in vero mentula magna minax! Have fun.
"I am therefore of this advise, that it not mete nor convenient for a Maiden to be taught or trained up in learning of humane arts, in whom a virÂÂtuous demeanor and honest behavior, would be a more sightlier ornament, then the light or vain glory of learning, for in learning and studying of the arts there are two things finally proposed to us, that is recreation and profit, touching profit, that is not to be looked for, at the hands of her that is given us for a companion in our labors, but rather every woman ought wholly to be active and diligent about the government of her household and family, and touching recreation by learning that canÂÂnot be granted her, without great danger and offence to the beauty and brightness of her mind; saying then that the government of estates and public weales are not committed into the hands of women, neither that it is lawful or convenient for them to write laws, by which men should be ruled and governed, as Draco, Licurgus, and Numa Pompilius did, neither as professors of Science and faculty, to teach in Schools the wisÂÂdom of Laws and Philosophy, and seeing also that in such studies, as yield recreation and pleasure, there is no less danger, that they will as well learn to be subtle and shameless Lovers, as cunning and skillful writers, of Ditties, Sonnet’s, Epigrams, and Ballades, let them be reÂÂstrained to the care and government of a family, and teach them to be envious in following those, that by true virtue have made little account of those, that to the prejudice of their good names, have been desirous to be reputed Diotimes, Aspaties, Sapphoes, and Corinnes. For such as comÂÂpare the small profit of learning with the great hurt and damage that comes to them by the same shall soon perceive (although that they reÂÂmain obstinate therein) how far more convenient the Distaff, and Spindle, Needle and Thimble were for them with a good and honest reputation, then the skill of well using a pen or writing a lofty verse with defame and dishonor, if in the same there be more erudition then virtue."
Mighty shrill there, Pete.
Hope you don't get sued for malpractice.
Check that statute. Show us where the statute say the board can declare the incapacity.
Without that authority, the board can't legally do anything under that section.
The closest they could come is the election code.
Huh=Esq. Doubt it