-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2006/04/25/strange-reactions/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
And before everyone gets excited about Topinka's suspension of the gas tax idea, perhaps we need to know exactly how much it might cost us in state revenues. Difficult to tell because gas prices are unpredictable, but it is certainly possible to come up with a few likely scenarios. And if the tax were to be suspended, what else isn't going to get paid for. Now I'd rather see a sales tax suspension rather than free preschool for everybody regardless of income , blank check medical care for illegals (Allkids), and all those Democratic pork projects for Chicago. But others might have other priorities. The problem is, we don't know how much this is going to cost us, or even have an idea. Without that information, it is impossible to judge this proposal, however appealing it might sound.
November's elections are a chance for Illinois voters to pick someone who can lead the state out of the mire of corruption in which the Ryan and Official A administrations have left us.
If the national media wants a tracking poll, they can get their own; we, the people of Illinois aren't going to let them hijack our election.
The look I saw was: Screw you.
Leach is just living up to his name. He has no interest in asking grow up questions. He already made up his mind who is right, and isn't listening to anyone anymore. Appearing on his show is just a waste of time.
The impact of high gas prices is greater on those working class families than other families.
If hotrod needs to tips . . . how about these:
1) Subsidize the growth of Ethanol plants throughout the state in rural economies. . . At the insistence of Todd Sieben, this was done by Pate and George Ryan with great success in Northern Illinois.
2) Use the state's current University Assests (U of I Engineering and ACES, SIU, ISU, Northwestern, University of Chicago)to create better ways to generate alcohol based fuels.
3) Attempt to generate new technologies or create incentives for current technologies which will help in burning Illnois Coal more effectively.
Issue 2: This Topinka Bush think has her in a pickle. Lets be clear, Topinka does not like Bush. If she didn't think she needed the RNC cash she would tell the President to take a Hike. I blogged that conservative(Bush Supporters) were the people working for the party, not the socially liberal pro-choice, pro-gay crowd. She won with her constiency. At lease if she loses another candidate will never rely on them again.
Issue 3: Note to Democrats you cannot beat Bush, he has a two term limit. He beat the best you had to offer twice. Continued badgering takes focus off of your agenda (as if you had one)and the negativity pushes people away. Leave him alone, his VP is no threat. Bush is bad is not a vision for the nation, it is a bad campaign strategy. I am as hardcore republican as it gets, and I am disturbed by many things in the state and national party. Lucky for Republicans the democrats have no answers or they could be in trouble on the national level like they are in IL.
Did you know only about 1% of the fuel burned actually goes to moving your car, while the rest is lost as heat, friction, and overcoming the inertia caused by heavy metal structures?
Boeing quickly learned carbon fibers save lots of fuel without sacrificing safety. In fact, if steel is so safe, why aren't bike helmets made out of it?
The auto industry and suppliers are in turmoil, but the producers of carbon fiber parts are the future to saving gas and strengthening our economy!
This is off topic, but it is not unreasonable to
view Allkids as a program for illegal immigrants.
One recent poll found 13 %Latino households with uninsured kids as opposed to 4% white households and under 2% black households.
Clearly, Allkids is a program for Latinos. And it's not unreasonable to assume that a substantial percentage of those uninsured Latino households are illegal.
We'll never know, of course, because Blago won't collect statistics on the immigration status of beneficiaries of this blank check welfare
program.
I'm not opposed to almost-free expensive health insurance for illegals per se. But first we should attend to the insurance needs of citizens...especially of young people entering the job market doing temporary jobs and unemployed 50 and 60 somethings not yet eligible for Medicare. Blago has shown no interest in these populations, presumably because he doesn't see them as a major source of votes. Perhaps he should rethink this, as Mitt Romney, a (Republican)governor already has.
If 13% of hispanic households have uninsured kids and 4% of white households do, that proves nothing. For one reason, there are so many more white kids in Illinois than there are Hispanic kids. It is also flawed logic. You cant just say that since a higher percentage of Hispanics are uninsured then AllKids is for them. Facts matter when you make claims like that and you should not make general comments like that without facts.
I agree about the importance of healthcare. AllKids covers middle and lower class kids regardless of race. I think it is a terrible thing to say that children of illegal immigrants should not recieve healthcare. All children deserve healthcare, to me it would take a hell of a person to say otherwise.
There also have been studies done (I believe one by the Kaiser Foundation) that showed uninsured patients have a far bigger cost to us in terms of what we end up paying for healthcare over what we would have to pay to help provide insurance to people.
I anticipate a great number of families will sign up in Southern Illinois, with a fraction of that being hispanic.
Allkids is not a hispanic program, come on! Think statewide, not just Chicago and suburbs.
1. A proposal to increase the electric sluppy on the East Coast by using wind power off the coast (this would free up natural gas ond petroleum of other uses)the propopsal was nixed by Senator Kennedy, who thought it might spoil his view.
2. Lets increase the oil from Alaska by drilling in an area that is approximately 2000 acres. No can not do because a carbou might be distrubed.
3. Let drill for natural gas off shore, no can not do may spoil the veiw or the beaches. the area being proposed is 150 mile off the coast. Remember even with the damage done by the hurricanes their was no oil on the beaches from the wells in the gulf.
The politicdans need and the citizenz should demand that a realistic energy policy get passed so the US can get off of the oil diet. We can not get out of the oil crisis until we look at what needs to be done, it will take about 10 years for the US to gear up for a change in energy use. The congress has stalled for political reasons and are holding all of us hostage. There is enough blame for all but the leaders in Illinois need to step up to the plate and lead. I guess we all should be thankful it was a mild winter.
What? You asked me a question that was off of the message I'm standing here trying to deliver? Sorry I can't hear you.
Bloggers like Jim Leach need to quit drinking the Blago cool aid and trying to link our state election to Bush. Sure, the campaign people can do that - but the press shouldn't fall for the trick.
It's funny because all during the presidential election I don't remember Blago saying BOO about Kerry or Bush, but now that the President's numbers are safely below 35% (probably even lower in IL) it's time to talk about national issues.
I wonder what Reagan would say.
The College of ACES at the University of Illinois is doing its part to reduce dependancy on foreign oil and clean our environment.
http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/news/stories/news3623....
Of course, extra funding (federal or state) could help get this program into a higher gear...
Why?
Because it won't lower the cost of gasoline a single penny!
The oil companies will simply keep the savings for themselves. They'll continue to charge whatever they can, regardless of tax or not.
A better idea is to earmark those additional revenues for ethanol and bio-diesel alternatives, or even mass transit.
This also helps balance the benefit. Downstate farmers get more money for crops, more jobs are created Downstate for the ethanol and bio-diesel plants, while Upstate (city/suburb) gets money to get people off the road and into a train.
If the tax cap on excessive gas prices is not a good idea, he should just SAY that, explain why, and then offer his own, better idea.
Oh wait, he doesn't have one. Quelle surprize!
Man, I should be his spokesman...
Keep Bush out of this issue. JBT may have to play with the team to get extra funding, but that happens all the time. That is just spin off the topic. Gregor got the point nailed: If you want the job, do it. Be leader. Fight in Springfield and get something done. With all the corn, ADM, and ag research capacity in the state you would think this is the perfect time to be the alternative fuel champion for the little guy. But no, lets squabble about who is responsible.