<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CapitolFax.com - Latest Comments in SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/subscribers_only_8211_afscme_seiu_dcfs_dillard/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:38:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DCFS is talking about 50:1 caseloads and the comments are only on Dillard? Let's not add to the impression that these scenarios aren't real.  Non-profits who contract with the state are running up to the end of their fiscal year.  They can't afford to keep people on the payroll because some people don't think this doomsday budget will come to pass.  This is real.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jojo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dillard tapes an Obama commercial and then insists he was loyal to McCain. It is different for sure, but not the kind of change we can believe in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GOP10</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:39:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why did Dillard get invited to Obama's inauguration?  It's not because of how great a McCain supporter he was.  It's one thing to say nice things in an interview or story about a guy.  It is quite another thing to record a paid campaign ad for Obama.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It doesn't take much of a Google search to find many instances of Dillard's glowing praise for Obama, even after the election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, Dillard is a classic Springfield politician-  will say what someone wants to hear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NoShore Con</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i love how dillard is a conservative-or a moderate--depending on the day of the week...and if he is a conservative, then what seperates himself from the other conservatives in the race?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Downstate GOP Faithless</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:46:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dillard will do a great job as Gov.  In the General Election, people will like the Obama ad as a new approach for politics.  The right wing in the primary now has a conservative can win!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YDD simple, we would anger and attack even more countries justtifying larger and greater combat abroad; and Haliburotn would flourish making insane amounts of money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh and we would probably be deregualting banks even more following McCains soltion to the savings and loan collapse which has served us so well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ghost</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY &amp;#8211; AFSCME; SEIU; DCFS; Dillard</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2009/06/12/subscribers-only-afscme-seiu-dcfs-dillard/#comment-18232645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;== I know youâ€™ll agree with me that weâ€™d be much better off if he [John McCain] were president today. ==&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Dillard is flip-flopping like a fish out of water.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, I'd love for him to explain to the public how "we" would be much better off if John McCain were President right now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope some gutsy reporter calls him and gets an answer to that question.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yellow Dog Democrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:24:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>