-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/12/20/subsidizing-wrigley/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Mark my words.
(That's sarcastic, BTW. The new soldier field looks awful and is an awful, awful stadium for football.)
From the outside....
umm....
go bears!
I'm sure it is. But that would still be a huge lowball and a giant subsidy.
Mr. Houlihan, you created this mess, now you are subsidizing the millionaires who own Wrigley Field, all at the expense of the home owners.It's time for Houlihan to pack it in......Quit or retire. You have been a miserable failure!!!!!
It's the Cubbie Blue Triangle of Life...
Grow up in the suburbs. Attend the U of I. Move to "Wrigleyville." Get married to a Cub fan. Move to the suburbs. Raise kids who go to the U of I, etc. :)
Grow up in the suburbs. Stay in the suburbs. Get married to your kin. Stay in the suburbs. Drive in to Comiskey, ignore "Comiskeyville", and pretend you are "from Chicago."
Raise kids who attach first base coaches, etc.
:)
But, I understand your characterization. When you have millions upon millions of fans, it is expected to have some bad apples.
Maybe he could sell them to the W.W. Wrigley Company, in which case it could be called Wrigley's Wrigley Field.