-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2009/07/06/the-blame-game/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
It is not a question of who will "win", but rather who will lose the least. There will be no winners in this Machiavellian mayhem; only losers, and the body bags have already begun piling up and the stench is becoming overwhelming.
I am struggling to decide however whether you have either had too much caffeine; or whether you will need to start free basing the stuff before breakfast is even served.
Either way seeing your postings here at this hour seems so uncharacteristic that I am hoping that they publish a public safety bulletin that would prohibit any restaurant from serving you soup at lunch time today. I am genuinely concerned that you could end up face down in the bowl and drown.
Went to bed early, slept for a few hours, woke up and worked. Going back to bed now.
Back to the topic, please.
It isn't. Quinn has kept the vast majority of Blago hacks and has no intention of firing them. When it comes to the porky Illinois state bureacracy Quinn is the union rep in the governor's mansion. Pretend you are firing the bad apples, but keep everybody on board, add many more (his budget proposal adds hundreds of state employees), and raise everybody's salaries (starting this past July 1, for most state employees). Shared sacrifice doesn't apply to the Quinn bureaucracy. The sacrifice is all on social service contractual agencies (for the moment) and on middle class taxpayers, whose shrinking pocketbook Quinn has been nonstop relentless about raiding. Unions, corporate interests, state bureaucrats...no sacrifices at all.
I may be wrong, but this is worth considering, no?
Another flip-flop is in order here. No politicking at soldiers' funerals.
Winners and losers? No one comes out great. Ultimately, the biggest loser will be the House GOP. If there's a tax increase, they'll have to put votes on, which they could have done in May, with probably fewer votes. If there's no tax increase and a Doomsday budget, they'll get the blame for not putting any votes on.
The sad part of all of this is that this dilutes the public perception that Blago was the big problem with the budget issues. Main stream media has not helped this situation because they like to infer that the real issue in the budget mess is the greedy state employees and teachers. Only venues like Rich's have explained in depth why we are where we are. The main stream media is not doing their part in real reporting on the budget issue. I am still seeing large market news stations making their obligatory reports on the budget situation. They have a reporter come on and make a big deal about the budget situation. Then they have a comment by a person on the pro tax side usually someone who would benefit by the tax increase. Then they have a comment from the opposition. Usually someone from the business groups who say " There are more cuts to be made before we look at increasing taxes." Then that is it. Viewer infer what they want. Neither side is questioned about where they would make the cuts or how the tax increase would help. The obligation is met and we go on to a Micheal Jackson story. There they get in depth.
I'll bet Blago is rolling on the floor laughing at every news cycle pointing at the TV saying "I told you so."
A quick question. If we had recall and it was decided to recall the Speaker, would this go before all the voters or just the voters of the district he represents?
And, I wish the Chicago media, particularly the electronic media, had the depth of knowlegde that Rich Miller has in articulating the problems in springfield.
During the memorial day ceremony in chicago, the governor used veterans as the reason why the tax increase was so vital. it wasn't perceived too well by many veterans, particuarly those who opposed being used as the reason for the tax increase. So, I would hope that the public would see the using of military funerals for a political purpose as most unseemly. Because is it. It also speaks to a certain desperation on quinn's part. It suggests, to me, that he'll exploit any and everyone (dead or alive) in an attempt to win an election. So where is the real care/concern for the fallen?
I don't know what people in central, southern and western illinois think of gov. quinn based on his actions as governor, rather than lt. governor. My only hope is that they are paying attention. There is an effective case to be made against him reminaing governor. ( to be honest, there is no shortage of reasons).
had quinn been serious about getting the budget he wanted, rallying legislators to his side should have been have been done before May 31st, instead of late last week for the first time.
Strategically I think that Mike Madigan is in the better and stronger political position ultimately. And, the chicago media needs to stop playing the "whose to blame game" and just call it like it is.
I don't see how any of this gridlock is attribtable to any single person....it is a perfect cluster* of years of lazy, entrenched leadership, a recession that won't quit, and lack of political courage...
Michael Madigan.
Actually, I don't know how much value Madigan places on winning. I think it is just get what I want and sell it like I'm losing.
The Trib's confirmation that Madigan and Cullerton have nearly seven decades of services and no note of any wrong doing was a refreshing bit of honest reporting
Republicans in Springfield. Locked out. Marginalized. Kept on a jar on a shelf and not allowed any input.
Then suddenly, they became important when Democrats failed in a basic function of government, to prepare and pass a balanced budget.
The public is not buying the "it's the Republicans' fault too!" argument so far. How much longer are the Springfield Democrats going to try to ride that dead horse?
The Repubs should be motivated to get some significant tradeoffs in exchange for their support for an increase, since such support could cost them so much in 2010. But are they tough enough to hold out against all the Quinn & Co. caterwauling. Not sure. That's why I wouldn't include Cross or Radogno in the potential Repub candiate group, however personally appealing each may be.
Instead he played high stakes to get all of his income tax increase approved, he lost and lost big. Because of the pending budget shut down, many social service agencies are not taking on new clients. For example right now siting in hospitals are children who could be home, but since the agencies will not fund new home services we get children who could be home stuck in hospitals. This goes on and on with various programs.
Quinn is acting as if he has all the time in the world be get a budget together, he does not. It is very likely that his veto will be over ridden. Really this is a mess.
Your memory banks seem to be failing you.
Quinn had no opportunity to veto earlier, as, even though appropriation bills were passed at the end of May, they were not sent to him until the end of June.
Also, Quinn has attempted many compromises including backing off of such as the two-tier pension plan, greater employee pension and health contributions, increased exemptions, and corporate increase at same rate as individual.
He was just not willing to compromise down to the level of 50% for social services.
A valid criticism would be if you think he should have taken 50% rather than zero.
As long as Filan is drawing a check, fumigating Jeff Mark is not impressive, Pat.
And about the $1 billion in cuts-how could it make sense to you to cut millions of dollars and hundreds of jobs everywhere from DCFS to the State Police, yet leave CMS untouched-no cuts, no layoffs?
benefits government employees and their unions.
Backing off of the corporate increase benefits corporations.
Backing off of the increased exemptions benefits
government coffers but not taxpayers, especially lower and middle class taxpayers on whose behalf Quinn seems unwilliing to compromise. In fact, if his tax increase goes through as proposed, it is this average income group that will bear its greatest burden. The social service contract agencies will be fully funded.
I disagree that Lisa has a lock on any office she wants. I think MJM is hurting his image by not leading. The budget mess has put him in the position of having to make a decision. The decision of either being an astute politician and doing what is necessary to protect his members and ensuring his party retains their strength, or being a leader and doing what is necessary to fix the budget mess. He is going to opt to do both but wait until November to do so, no matter who that hurts now. That will tarnish his image and I think some of that rubs off on Lisa. I also agree with Rich in that she is hurting herself by not taking a stand on the most important issue facing the State at this time. She can't take the position that her office does not deal with the budget so she is staying out of it. She was vocal when Blago's budget affected her office so she doesn't get a walk on it now. So she will play the same game and the Madigan name could come to mean those who wait to protect their interets instead of those who act for the public good.
This isn't a prison closing in some other part of the state, or some state employees being laid off somewhere. This is your local mental health center, domestic violence shelter, the day programs for developmentally disabled that your neighbor's son goes to, subsidized child care for working poor people right there in your own home town, the community care workers who keep your elderly mom from having to go into a nursing home. I think there is going to be Hell to pay, and there should be.
I think ordinary people aren't going to be the least bit interested in the blame game. I believe their thinking will be more along the lines of "we send you to Springfield, we don't ask much of you, we re-elect you whenever you run, we don't bug you about your salary going up,and you are letting this crap happen right here." I think there's going to be more heat than most members can take.
2:39 is a phony although he does make some good points with no spelling or grammar errors.
Where are all the Good Voters
Who Voted Gov. Rod into office Twice ????
Are They standing behind him or what ????
Where are all the Reps etc.
Including JAY HOFFMAN
Who got people JOBS and Wasted Taxpayers
Monies
Robbed money from YOU
and spent Foolish
Are They Hiding and ashamed for their ACTIONS
Remember this VOTERS !!!!!
You were taking advantage of for Sure !!!!
How screwed up is that?
He refuses to reassure the nonprofits who contract with the state to provide services that they will be paid if they continue to provide services after July 1st. Regardless of his inability to veto -- why not negotiate in good faith? Same goes for Mr. Madigan.
People who need services, medicines, treatment aren't getting them.
I wish these two men at the top of the power pyramid could try and walk a mile in the shoes of some of the people we've discharged from services. They wouldn't last a day.
I was willing to give him a chance, but not after he pulled this crappy stunt out of the Blago playbook. Not only is it bad politics, it's not even original!!
Hoping Quinn will face opposition in the Dem primary...doubting it will come to pass, unless Obama admin can be convinced to throw him a fat ambassadorship or cabinet-level post. (and wouldn't it be delightful to be a fly on Blago's wall if such came to pass?? How many arteries would Milorad blow if such irony came to pass??)
The GOP.
That's pretty funny, Vannie.