<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CapitolFax.com - Latest Comments in This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_85/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:12:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Rod's a magician now?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just call him "Rod Blagojevich -- MindFreak!!!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">South Sider</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;drmgrrl&lt;br&gt;I must hasten to add that I did not mean to disparage democratic party disunity, without it we wouldn't have such a lively and lengthy blog through the late winter, spring, summer and now the fall. And I wouldn't have gotten to know you and Bill so well! How good can it get? Rich has probably jumped up one tax bracket, at least. Democratic disunity can be profitable, just not for dems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Citizen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with "It's Just Me."  Helmet hair boy only spews forth the same few lines.  He sounds like one of those dolls with the string you yank to make it talk.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Papa Legba</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;drmgrrl&lt;br&gt;"...and will keep blaming jones and blagojevich..." But of course, they really are the blameful ones. Welcome to the world of reality. Last I checked Watson was not in a majority position. Blaming Republicans for democratic party disunity is very disingenuous of you - You are better than that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Citizen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cassandra -- none of the dems i know voted for blago anyway.  they all either voted green or republican in the last election.  also, if republicans are the minority, then they don't really matter in our system -- we don't have proportional representation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Demgrrl at 4:20 -- PUH-LEASE!!!!  Anyone who has a reference to being a democrat in their screenname should NOT be critical of a Republican for sounding like a broken record.  How many times have we heard the terms "Reform and Renewal" or "Corporate Tax-Loop Holes" in the past 5 years?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cassandra at 7:42 -- You really need to get a little more educated before you post on here.  Any capital bill at all requires a super-majority because it involves borrowing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">It's Just Me</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it possible that the "magic money" for the CTA comes from the cash he freed-up for his universal healthcare?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The way he sees it, he'll get the money back into healthcare later. He can afford to take some of the "healthcare cash" now for the CTA, since once you start funding healthcare-for-all... one just has to keep increasing the funding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">unclesam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Blago waits until he doesn't need the Repubs and pushes through a capital bill with all the good stuff going to cooperative Dem districts, how will that fly with the rest of the electorate. I don't know how much attention people pay to capital expenditures in making voting decisions, but I could see a critical mass of angry moderate Republicans and disaffected Dems voting for a viable Blago opponent in the 2010 primaries. &lt;br&gt;Especially if, as seems possible, the Repubs&lt;br&gt;go with a right-wing candidate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cassandra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;June 30, 2008 - Then they start the sequel. Hopefully with a few new players. And a brand new plotline.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Citizen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:34:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the band played on ..............!!   When will this end ?????&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">annon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently BlunderBo forgot he could not pass these statewide tax increases in '07 with simple majority...what makes you think anything changes except that you are in the middle of the campaigns.&lt;br&gt;It could mean all these primary challenges he is planning will not&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GettingJonesed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They return at 9:30 tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AsAMom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They just gaveled in and out for SS # 1-16... they are now on regular session.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AsAMom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:51:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The SEnate is in now... if you have the video selected you can't hear the audio. Choose audio only.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AsAMom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:48:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks VandaliaFrank bounced the bright ball into the street and both the BlunderBoy and the Senate President got smacked big time.&lt;br&gt;What were they thinking?&lt;br&gt;Hey was the BlunderBoy even in town today?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GettingJonesed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Republicans need to get what they can now. If this goes into January, i don't think that  their vote will be needed anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;watson is nothing more than a broken record. how many times will he be able to get away with these lines? how about checking your political hat at the door and trying to get things done for once. blame can go all around, but he obviously has zero interest in being part of a solution and will keep blaming jones and blagojevich.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">demgrrl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anon, while there are things Watson wants done, technically the democrats should have been in a position to operate without him at all. The Current rift means both factions require supports from the republicans. Watson is in the catbird seat, if he fails to deliver on a capitol programs he can always blame the dem's and the repubs minority (in fact expect that to be a big part of the upcoming campaigns.) Getting his programs actually implemented is more bonus points then a necessity. He only needs to say how hard he tried but was shut donw by the dem majority, and beg voters to put more repubs back in office. He stands to gain more from being shut down then from succeeding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ghost</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:10:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...wasted their time ... - gov must still think he's going to get GRT and Massive Healthcare. Don't think so. Maybe Emil will realize the futility of trying to negotiate with blago - as Watson said, they wasted their time. So I would suggest, as I did many months ago, that they assume gov to be irrelevant (due to his intransigence) and simply move on with over rides and implementation. Way past time to deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Citizen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:03:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody in that room is in the catbird seat. If Watson doesnt get a&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Anon - Monday, Sep 17, 07 @ 3:32 pm:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cap bill, he may be toast&lt;br&gt;R U crazy Anon?  Do you think Frank has members who want to make an agreement with the Gov?  Bet Not!  Yeah thats what repubs needs, Blago traveling all over the state cuting ribbons.  There is no pressure on Frank in his caucus for a cap bill.  He wants it himself, becaseu he thinks its the right thing to do, nothing more, nothing less.  Blago still has to issue the project mney, you think any repubs think that wont come at a price?  "Sure I will give your bride $ Senator, but first I need your vote on (BLANK).  Nobody is toast if we don't get acap bill, except for the state itself.  Madigan won't let Blago run around the state and cut ribbons for the next three years, won't happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">what?</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds like this is going to be a fun week&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Napoleon has left the building</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cap bill, he may be toast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ghost, while the repubs are in the game, I would hardly say that Watson is in the catbird seat.  He needs this capital program as much or more than Rod and Emil.  If he didnt, why was he publicly pleading with Emil to reconsider the bill the day after the bond authorization vote went down and Emil declared it "dead."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nobody in that room is in the catbird seat.  If Watson doesnt get a&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I heard they are negotiating on giving out an advance from the 2007 'speaker repair' fund, allowing the Senate can meet again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leroy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfax.com/2007/09/17/this-just-in-64/#comment-18120350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And after VandaliaFrank gets his boddle he cangiggle all the way to Greenville because he knows Cross will have zero votes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GettingJonesed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>