-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/07/18/this-just-in-34/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Denny, come to your senses and run again, at least in the primary.
Thanks to the Illinois Democrats, we have a lame duck in office six months after election day - and it is quacking in the governor's office, that is, when it is at work.
Every statewide office and legislative body is controlled by the Illinois Democratic Party. How do you like them now? The only records being broken is the length of time Illinois has done without a budget. Ridiculous.
When you have one party in power like we do right now, and that party is falling flat on it's face like we see right now, then there should be no reason for voters to believe that this party is capable of governing. 30 years out of the governor's office, and this is what we get?
What a bunch of losers.
Todd Stroger will never be re-elected. He is simply in way over his head, much like Eugene Sawyer. He also has a peculair genious for bad public relations, which has destroyed his credibility for all time.
I would encourage Dorothy Brown to run against him. I could support her, but not Stroger.
If one of the three leading Democratic contenders on the Board does not beat him, then Liz Gorman will. I suspect Suffredin will end up running for some other office. I like Mike Quigley, I think he's got a great policy/technocratic mind. But either he or Claypool will have to blink again for the greater good of defeating Todd Stroger.
Although, I am a committed Democrat,I believe I would consider actively campaigning for Liz Gorman, if Todd Stroger is the Democratic nominee in 2010.
"Roeser . . . has used his wealth to field candidates and fund staff who repeatedly use withering criticisms to attack the old guard GOP social moderates who control the state Republican Party. But his insurgent efforts have made little progress with the GOP at large and he hasn't had a very good track record in backing candidates for state office"
These observations are accurate. Similar observations could apply to much of the ongoing tactics of the conservative wing of the Illinois GOP.
One would think that a change in stategy - towards change through cooperation, and away from the bombthrowers - is in order.
But don't count on it from some of these guys. A helmet-head by any other name still has steel on top.
blago, stroger and jones represent the trifecta of "leaders" of the state's democratic party who maintain relatively high disapprovals.
without them (and dan lipinski) the party would be much stronger.
I agree. Problem is, the Republican Party hasn't proven itself to be much better--after all, their last Governor is a convicted felon! So, exactly what is a reasonable person to do? Need I even state my suggestion? I think you already know.
==Thanks to the Illinois Democrats, we have a lame duck in office six months after election day - and it is quacking in the governor’s office, that is, when it is at work.
==What a bunch of losers.
Technically, they are a bunch of winners. And I agree and argued your point encouraging anyone not named Eisendrath to run in the primary. But what does it say that the Republicans couldn't beat that guy?
And winning candidates? He helped Gary Dahl, Roskam, both Bush's, Reagan, Hastert, Karmeir, Fitzgerald and many, many others.
But go ahead Rich, maybe call on Roeser and other people you hate to leave the state again like you did after the primary last year. Maybe there are still some old cattle railroad cars oversees you can use to cart out the people that remind you of your incredible smallness.
Also, I wonder if any of those people he "helped" will actually admit that he made any difference, or if they'll do their very best to distance themselves from him. Roeser is a loser. He will always be a loser. You, on the other hand, are just silly.
Jack Roeser had little to do with any of the aforementioned candidates. How, exactly, did Jack help Bush? Bush 43 lost Illinois decisively each time. Karmeier was able to win due to an all-in effort by the state GOP and a lot of campaign cash. And Gary Dahl was a bit of a fluke, although he is a great senator and a good person.
Rich, my brother wears Birkenstocks and he's as conservative as they come. Don't take any crap from "ha".
You're a sad man and a liar.
Oh, on the list of wins for Roeser, add WWII. He's a combat vet from the Pacific Theater.
Had this [budget cuts] been accomplished while Peraica was president, a thunderous hue and cry would have arisen among liberals and Democrats. Peraica would have been vilified with the usual refrain of “balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.†Yet they were mum on Todd.
Ironically, Stroger’s fiercest critic was Peraica, who was incensed that while 712 high-paid management jobs were cut, 827 were added, for a net increase of 115, at a cost of $7.6 million. Spokesmen for Sheriff Tom Dart and State’s Attorney Dick Devine bemoaned the fact that the budget allegedly cut “front-line jobs†while padding high-paid jobs. “The bloat is still there,†said Peraica. Republican county commissioners Gorman, Pete Silvestri, and Gregg Goslin backed the Stroger budget, as did Quigley.
===I'm a staunch Republican, but I'm rooting for Topinka to lose.===
Look Rich, you shilled non-stop for Topinka, that was a huge loss for you. Then you got invited on the bus and shilled for Blago and the GRT. Another huge loss for you.
You've lost this debate too. Looks like loser, loser, loser.
You guys are so funny. Slightly maniacal, but funny. I retracted it, fully explained my position and you say I lost the debate? Nope. Y'all have lost so many times that you apparenty don't even recognize it when you are eye-deep in loserdom.
BTW, a commenter above made a good point. Is Roeser gonna run someone against Bill Brady in the state Senate race like he promised? That ought to be a hoot.