-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/10/30/this-just-in-cellini-indicted/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Tick-Tock-Tick-Tock
The feds are getting closer and closer.
1) The monies that went from Bear Stearns to Kjellander to Rezko.
2) They can also get down to brass tacks on what happened on the Hospital board when it went from 15 members to 9- giving Rezko and Levine control.
This it is all going to fall like dominos from here. Maybe we cn expect a kjellander indictment soon?
Lucid Brazzi- you are right a lot of these guys were doing the same thing with Ryan in charge. They just refined it when POA got in and distilled it down farther and even got more brazen about it.
This puts alot of pressure on Kelly. It must feel like a migrane.
I don't mean to create a partisan discussion here but actually BO get's into the mix because he was the one who Rezko contacted to draw down the board size so that he and Levine could control it.
Also, I forget the guys name who was chair of the TRS board but his kid worked for Hurtgen at Bear. You can expect that to play out.
Fitzy is no joke. He's like Elliot Ness.
lol
2) I would LOVE IT if Kjellander went down.
3) Keep talking Tony!
4) hey isn't Vrodlyak's trial starting soon?
I think his indictment tarnishes the reputations of Thompson, Edgar and, further, Ryan, too. He was a big part of their networks; they're smart guys. Are we too believe they didn't know what was going on, or are we to understand he just started doing this stuff when Blago hit town?
Ten get's you Twenty this tees up some heavy hitters...Maybe even a former Cabinet Member...
Is this zeroing in on Blagojevich?
Or is this just more of the mess that Blagojevich was (is) but one actor among many?
Get the drift?
Macbeth, I don't know, except maybe to say he knew about it. I do wonder if he and his wife are now in negotiations with Fitz for some kind of deal whereby he and/or she will not be prosecuted.
One theme that runs through all these federal indictment stories is our Blago's desire to have a beyond hefty campaign chest. One wonders why. A comparatively young Democrat in a blue state following a long Republican regime and the indictment of a Republican governor. How much money did he think he needed to win against Judy Baar Topinka. Was she really that scary, especially against the background of the widely publicized Ryan trial. Or any other potential Republican opponent in 2006,
Any amazing lack of judgment--or of competent advisors.
That is the extent of his mention.
Is this a hardening or softening of the USA's view of Gov's involvement?
I gots me some bad friends, but just cause they are involved in shady stuff doesn't mean I subscribe to similar behaviors.
POA may come out of this clean of charges. And it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel FINE!
I believe the term "Public Official A" is a Red Herring in these indictments.
The only "cash gifts" given to a Blagojevich family member that were not a campaign donation or a realty fee, was the birthday cash given to little Amy Blagojevich.
I'm confident the "A" stands for Amy.
The Governor lives to fight another day!
Indict/Impeach but please get rid of POA now! It is the change the voters deserve this fall.
That was right smack dab in the middle of Fitz's special counsel investigation of the Plame Affair.
Libby first testified before the grand jury in March 2004. Rove in October 2004.
Also during this time, Ashcroft was laid up in the hospital and Alberto Gonzales was throwing his weight around the Justice Department as White House counsel. He'd be appointed attorney general in February 2005.
I always thought this particular revelation during the Rezko trial was a lot of empty boasting, but the U.S. Attorney has seen fit to include it. Wonder why?
If anyone in the White House was dumb enough to talk to these characters about removing a U.S. Attorney who was actively investigating members of the White House staff, then this could get a lot more interesting.
"People" are wrong.
don't care who y'are, that's funny!
thank you, wacker drive, for that LOL
"I am not a crook."
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
"The worst thing I can be accused of is asking my own wife to have sex in an inappropriate place."
"I am not Public Official A."
Hmmmmm....
9 Guilty Pleas (Kiefbaum, Glennon, Levine, Cari et al)
1 Conviction (Rezko)
3 yet to go to trial (Hurtgen,Cellini and Kelly)
Just Two More Indcitments To Go:
POA
Big Bob K
I think the February/2008 date is the date this grand jury was put in place.
I remember testimony at the Rezko trial that Rezko called Cellini hundreds of time on his cell phone, but Cellini never once called Rezko. Once Cellini talks, I would not be offended if he is given a suspended prison sentence.
It's nothing personal. Just business.
You make an excellent point that unpaid home improvements took down Stevens. That's a tough one to pin on Amy....maybe.
"Listen honey, I just shut down Pontiac prison, so you won't have to go to any shabby places. If you just take the rap for me, Daddy gets to keep his pension."
BandCamp, sounds like defense exhibit A!
I think the February/2008 date is the date this grand jury was put in place."
Exactly right. Also, don't be too surprised if Cellini isn't actively working to cut a deal, if one isn't already in place. He's certainly not stupid (he's no martyr), and he's been watching the progression of the domino's falling.
If you're going down, better to be riding the domino going down than having it land on top of you. You've got a little better leverage. Cellini will be smarter than Tony.
"Fast Eddie" has got to be getting terribly concerned.
It certainly sounds like from the Levine/Cellini tape that he knows right from wrong...
Not to pat myself on the back, but I think I predicted on here awhile back that another Republican would likely be indicted before Blago.
I did think Individual K (Kjellander) would go the same time as his bud Individual A. So I missed that part.
The hits keep on coming for the Illinois GOP.
This is bad for Kjellander as well as he gave Rezko a check ofr nearly $500K that came from Bear Stearns and was filtered through various companies. Also, it menas that Big Bob K is going to have to explain his statements to the feds that that paymnet was "for a loan". If that means lying to Federal Investigators he's in big trouble.
The hubris of these guys is amazing. It's all so clear what they were up to.
Levine proved that he is BFF with the US attorney during the last trial. It is Haloween tomorrow, so I guess that it is appropiate to say that Levine on tape is the same as being dressed in a Sarah Palin costume. Both are phonies!!!
Unless he wants to spend the rest of his life in jail he will turn. Then Cellini is toast for sure. If it goes how I see it, Kjellander will be the next to be indicted.
So to summarize:
Kelly- Flips
Cellini- Holds out for trial because he's old and arrogant
Kjellander- just goes down no deal no nothing.
Blago is indicted with or w/o Cellini.
The only bets that are "on" right now are bets on how far this goes on "the whole removal of US- Attorney" deal. There could be some interesting developments there.
Statutes of limitations will begin expiring next year. So, if there are gonna be indictments, they will come long before the Cellini trial starts.
Nick Hurtgen
Chris Kelly
Peter Fox
Tommy Thompson
Big Bob $
Patti B
People who are to stupid to be worried
Gov. Rod
Interesting List. Do you say Tommy B/C of the whole "removal of US Attorney" thing?
word, AA's opinion about why that reference to removing Fitz is in there is because it "got personal" if you will.
Wasn't former gov. / now 'Statesman' Thompson the gov when HE lost the Federal trial regarding political hiring that's become known as Rutan?
What a crew.
When the combine "void/Vacuum" is created by Fitzy, Glenview would like to nominate A. Andersen and Wordslinger to fill in for Cellini and Bob K, respectfully.
If the Feds can show a continuing conspiracy to cover up, the statute of limitations might not apply.
Is Brunai a non-extradition country?
You can run, but the hair can't hide.
Cellini was good friends with former TRS Director Bob Daniels, who was also former head of the Illinois Education Association (IEA). For years Daniels was on the TRS Board of directors and effectively ran the investment committee on behalf of Cellini and friends. At some point in the 1990's, Daniels resigned from the board and got himself appointed Executive Director of TRS. It was about this same time that Bauman was brought in, because Daniels owed a huge personal favor to Cellini involving some "family matters".
Daniels stayed at TRS about 5 or 6 years and resigned. At the time of his departure the FBI was at the agency to examine some behavior, but it is apparently unrelated to the current activities.
After Daniels departure, an "outsider" was brought in to be the Executive Director. He lasted 2 or 3 years and was later ousted, largely rumor had because he wouldn't play along with some of this non-sense that is going on now.
Bauman was later named Executive Director and has been in the position since.
This attitude of "you take care of me and I will take care of you" has been pervasive at TRS regarding Cellini, the investment committee throughout the Thompson, Edgar and Ryan administrations. What changed was that Blago and the boys decided to clearly quantify what level of campaign contributions were needed to continue playing the game and those that didn't pay the price were out of luck. It wasn't going to be enough anymore to just hold a fundraiser, you needed to payup. And obviously the appointment of Fitzgerald as US Attorney opened the door for review of these activities.
So who is the loser? Taxpayers and our public school teachers. Leadership at the IEA had to know about these schemes, especially considering Daniels was the former IEA leader. Nothing changed after he left, so IEA in my opinion turned a blind eye as they should have been watching out for their members pensions.
Could you have your next slave/intern do a report on Dan Webb's various defense quotes...I think he is recycling. Clients are entitled fresh material
And FYI
Most now believe some or all of that cash from the Oct '02 funded went right into the room addition/remodeling account
Ex. Spitzer, NY, Fletcher, KY, Mecham, AZ, Taft, OH are examples that you can find with a simple Google search, though I admittedly don't have all the details.
One judge in KY ruled that the Governor could not be tried while in office. That would probably be contingent on the severity of the charges, but just try running after indictment while still in office. Could be a challenge, but be fun to watch for all of us sideliners. Maybe we will get to see that. :-)
Based on the experience of a relative who once sat on a county-level grand jury, I believe they usually last about six months and meet at least once a week. Do federal grand juries have different rules?
Golfo, I think there's an insult in there, but for the life of me I can't figure why or what it might be. So for now, I'll deliver a conditional "Bite Me," that I reserve the right to withdraw or expand upon clarification.
If there are Combine openings, I'd like to interview soon as the holidays are upon us and you can always use the extra cash. And I mean cash only.
And as for Chris, well that is a similar story but in a different vein...
One question, though. What's wrong with "conspiring" to get rid of a USA? Don't political parties conspire every day to get rid of people? It may be unseemly, but why is it illegal?
Maybe it has something to do with obstruction of justice? It may not be so much what was done as Why it was done.
"Rich, I commend you for recognizing that Fitz will not long be US Atty in Chicago if Obama wins." What is that about? Both Obama and McCain are on tape with the Chicago Tribune editorial board saying they will keep Fitzgerald. Is there something afoot?
Link - Thanks for the 1970 character analysis. We should all be judged on our ethics as 14 year olds. You are a moron.
Federal grand jury is an 18 months term, 1 day per week (9:30 to 4:30; 1 hour for lunch), can be extended beyond the 18 month term. Extensions only occur upon agreement by a majority of the grand jury members, and the grand jury has a clear-cut picture of the cases they will be handling in the extension period.
Pay sucks. Pay mileage, no parking furnished or paid for. However, the second floor cafeteria (for breakfast) is really pretty good. Lunch depends.
for the I-355 expansion.
+Jack Hartman
+Bill Cellini
+Brian McPartlin
+Jeff Dailey
= $$$$$$$$$$$$ for Rod Blagojevich.
I can't make any sustantive comments about what transpired today, or what I read in goofy blog posts, but two things need to be said right now.
Anon. 7:09, you have the wrong Co-Schemer A. Read the document again and you may figure it out.
Links, Keep my dad out of your cheap shots. Jerk.
Reality bites but that is how it works. Never steal or commit fraud over a couple thousand dollars. Do it for millions of dollars so it pays for you to go sit in jail and watch television during your minimal sentence. I personally know a guy (my ex-boss) who only did 3 years for fraud although in excess of $70 million dollars vanished. Illinois taxpayers got to pick up most of the tab. He had told me before he got caught that crime does pay. His girl friend (corporate secretary) also did less than 3 years. They were both already out of jail and living happily ever after before the civil litigants had even made their way through the court system. Crime pays and pays nicely.
Still, a 20 year run in the combine, as long as you know when to pull the rip cord, can be long satisfying siphon on the taxpayer.
Look at Fox he's played it perfectly.
My dad got called for a fed grand jury a couple of years ago in Benton. 1 tuesday a month for 12 months.