-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2008/12/30/this-just-in-179/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Smart move on his part by appointing a 'senior Democratic statesman' from the state it makes it harder for the senate to say no.
http://htsblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/posible-wor...
Also it would appear the governor does not want you to have a day off.
And, please, won't Roland Burris please just fade away?!? He's a soreheaded fussbudget whose time has come and gone. So please go.
Both parties need to ensure that this appointment doesn't take place in order to cut Blago's perceived "I'm in charge and look I'm doing my job" persona right now. Of course, the perception is geared toward joe public, not us politicos.
Let's hope Madigan, Emil/Cullerton, and Reid all step up and see this as the Governor tipping his hat to their concerns and don't drag this issue on any longer...
Even Quinn has called for a special election. Why would he now change that position and support the Blagojevich appointment of Burris?
Not for a second did I believe Burris was running in '02 to win. I give credit to Rod for the cleverness of his appointment.
It is amazing to see that there are individuals still willing to pal up with him, however, Burris has nothing to lose. He's about as relevant as Blago himself.
The sad part is that this selection had to be approved by his attorney who is leading him into a 20 year stretch in the pen and basically destroying his family and any chance of redemption for this pathetic individual. Basically, Mr. Genson is serving himself at his clients expense.
Well, it's clear Rod doesn't care if he makes Gensen into a liar. So much for the committee believing anything out of that guy's mouth.
Rod has to be aggressive on this, there are no two ways about it.
What does this appointment accomplish, except to further antagonize people?
Don't forget Pumpkin Haid...
He was never seriously considered, no doubt, because he had nothing of value to offer.
But the indictment and the Obama's team's refusal to play along kind of took juice out of that approach.
There is no more damning evidence of being a has been than to get this appointment now, in this way.
-Harry Reid and company will not dare refuse to seat a black nominee to their current lily white club
Welcome Sen Burris
Crafty move by Blago to play to his 7% support although appointing JJJ would have really poked White and Reid in the eye
General Burris is a fine choice. He has a long and distinguished record as a public servant, an advocate for civil and human rights, and a champion for the working women and men of Illinois.
Congratulations, SENATOR Burris!
Oh wait...that was Roland Harper...
He is perfectly aware of the situation, isn't he? Why would he accept a nomination from this man, at this time?
What does this say about Roland Burris? Based on his record of state service it says that he may be a honest guy, but has a political hunger that still goes unsatiated after several primary defeats. Hungry enough to face the reactions he will endure being seen as a Blagojevich stooge.
This situation screws around with the political story being written by a group of risk-adverse legislators. Due to their concern over covering their own behinds, they have left Blagojevich with the executive power to select our next senator.
Gensen said last week that this wouldn't happen. Hearing it from Blagojevich's defense attorney gave his claim some credibility. In naming Burris, Blagojevich tackles Gensen publically and casts doubts on any future statements Gensen will make concerning the Governor.
I guess Blagojevich decided after watching last week's Impeachment Committee hearings that any hopes he had with Gensen are unworkable. With this move, Blagojevich asks Illinoians to replace the losing poker hand he dealt himself.
The entire thing is a ruse and Burris knows it. Yet he is ambitious enough to play along. This casts Burris into a new public light, doesn't it?
This was the clue.
The machine has oiled all the parts.
The only issue was how to get the appointment done without Quinn getting into the act.
Now that the appointment is made, everyone will retract their statements, including all 50 Dems in the Senate.
Burris will win the nomination, possibly without any serious opposition.
Blalgo still has a chance for the Gov nomination with the vote split up with: Lisa, Dan, Quinn and maybe others.
With the Burris appointment, Blago can also count on some majaor black support.
Winners: Blago and the machine.
Losers: Quinn, Fitzgerald (his case is going to be much harder against a sitting governor), the GOP, Harry Reid (he'll have to eat crow).
Right....
Please pass the peace pipe.......
Rich wrote: " A quick check of campaign finance records shows Burris’ consulting company has contributed about $11K to Blagojevich’s campaign fund. The consulting company has benefitted from a bunch of state contracts since then, many of which doing PR work on behalf of IDOT minority contracting efforts."
Just what I was thinking - what planet is TO on?
If Reid thinks he can block a legitimate appointment, than you are probably right. He has no say in a duly appointed Senator with no criminal record. He also doesn't have the votes. I'll guess he'll find out. So will we.
1) This is just Blago's way of sticking the middle finger to the Dems and especially MJM. He understands that the Republicans have focused all their energy on calling for a special election, and knows what kind of headache this will cause.
2) He just considerably sped up the impeachment process.
Again our goal is to get you into the Senate not Burris.
That being said I think you are right, there will at the least be an ugly court fight over this.
"I can not accept an appointment from this man, he needs to be removed from office before he does anything else"
Then watch stuff truly go nuts.
(10 ILCS 5/25‑8) (from Ch. 46, par. 25‑8)
Sec. 25‑8. When a vacancy shall occur in the office of United States Senator from this state, the Governor shall make temporary appointment to fill such vacancy until the next election of representatives in Congress, at which time such vacancy shall be filled by election, and the senator so elected shall take office as soon thereafter as he shall receive his certificate of election.
(Source: Laws 1943, vol. 2, p. 1.)
Thanks but i've pretty much given up hope of getting appointed. If it can't be me I would hope it would be a person with the accomplishments, dedication, record, work ethic, intelligence, and experience of that great public servant, General Roland Burris.
how-legally or politically-Jesse White or the Dems
in Washington can refuse to seat Burris without
doing even more damage to the Democratic Party in
Illinois.
wordslinger, are you talking about the rules of the U.S. Senate or the Illinois Senate?
But, frankly, if it ends up being burris as senator for the next 2-8 years, that would be alright with me.
http://flickr.com/photos/96929438@N00/196788746...
There are a lot of mediocrities in the US Senate. Burris won't be out of place there.
Exactly. Things have been much too quiet, and they were about to become even more so as the impeachment committee awaits a decision on the tapes.
Is anyone even attempting to advise this man? I'd love to know what's been going on behind the scenes, especially with Lucio and the other press secretaries.
Ahem, great comment about Blague. http://french.about.com/cs/vocabulary/g/blague.htm
This is going to upset the Obama team BIG TIME. We have a serious financial situation in this country, we are at war in at least two theaters (Iraq and Afghanistan), Israel is now the lead of story for every news outlet, Obama is trying to get his things in order so he will be up to speed the nano-second after he takes the oath of office, Obama has been deflecting lots of negative attention from him and his team about Blago, and now this announcement, which will draw every single media outlet's attention away from more important matters of the day.
Am I surprised by this appointment? Not at all, considering yesterday was such a horrible day for Ed Gensen in front of the committee (talk about getting spanked). We all know that after such negative publicity, Blago craves something positive. The point is that this announcement will prove to the entire country (and it should to Ed Gensen as well) just exactly how seriously delusional Blago really is.
As for Roland Burris, yes he WAS a fine politician in his day. Since being AG, he has tried (unsuccessfully) to be Governor at least twice and I think Mayor of Chicago, even though his home is Centralia, Illinois. Burris has contributed to Blago, has contracts under Blago's administration, so why in the world would Roland want to end his political career with this as a footnote?
I think with yesterday's hearing, Blago sees the writing on the wall and thought he'd go for the appointment and let the chips fall where they may. Remember, publicly he practically dared Fitzgerald to wiretap him, even though he knew it had already been done. Now he is daring Harry Reid to refuse to seat Roland Burris. Bill, even though you don't think it will successful - it will be succesful. And on the odd chance that you ARE correct, it will leave Illinois without a second senator for many months (of course, why should that matter, we have only had one senator for the last two years anyway), perhaps the entire two remaining years, while this plays out in the court system.
Way to go Rod. You've outdone yourself yet again. But this time, you are on the radar of the entire world press and for this deed, you will be literally drawn and quartered.
If that is really Roland Burris' monument - he should be ashamed of himself.
Now, if the House had just acted like it was in charge and issued supeanas to anyone remotely connected to this rot in Illinois they maybe could have been a few steps ahead of the Guv and in charge of events.
As for Genson, check out the national news channels. They seem to think he had a pretty good day and the talking head legal experts think he brought up many valid points.
If this move speeds up impeachment, and Quinn takes over, couldn't he withdraw the appointment?
Then again, Blago would take that to court...that would take more time....
The US Senate is a club. They make up their own rules. Harry Reid as Senate Majority leader and the leader of the Senate Democrats can bury Burris in committees totally irrelevant to the state of Illinois.
While I don't know about the powers to deny Burris a seat in the Senate, I do know the Senate rules already in place grant immense powers to the Majority Leader that also happens to be your Senate party leader.
This is why you see Quinn, Durbin, and the Republicans calling for a special election.
An ugly precedent, I admit. But a precedent. I'm not sure anyone is going to want to trot that one out to justify keeping Burris out.
You think Obama would want to get within 10 meters of anyone or anything involved in the open senate seat at this point? He has much better things to do with his political capitol.
...you will be literally drawn and quartered.
Literally? Really? They're going to tie him to horses and tear him limb from limb for this? I'm all for removing him from office and sending him to prison, but that may be going a bit too far
And Jesse White has no grounds to stand on and Harry Reid is only slightly better off. Burris will be a senator even if Blago is impeached later.
Burris is an ex-AG and respected figure, one diffcult for White to reject.
I think Harry Reid is, as usual, a lot of sound and fury signifying not much.
Burris is a close to being a Republican as a Black Democrat can be in Illinois, and the GOP leadership in legislature knows it (even if McKenna's staff does not.) He is a someone the GOP in the U.S. Senate can support to outflank Reid by making him look like the jerk. He will be seated.
And to think he screwed Vallas in the past. Politics can make strange bedfellows!
2010 sure is getting more interesting day by day . . .
LOL.
get in touch people - it is a better use of your time.
We are angry and cynical - and we are still getting screwed by this guy because of the bumbling antics of our elected officials.
Blagojevich is to blame for his behavior, but so is everyone else who's job it is as elected officials to remove him before he damages Illinois further.
A special election is needed not because of party politics. A special election is needed because of the destroyed credibility this government currently has. Why do you care which party does what when we are all witnessing that both parties are too disabled to take action during this crisis? Who cares who wins at this point? How could you even care about something so unimportant? Are you blind?
We all knew Blagojevich would have to go. Madigan even drew up talking points. Conversations have been had. Plans have been discussed. What we do not have is action at a time when action is so badly needed.
Now this? And some of you people want to talk about politics! Are you people nuts? Who cares about that when both parties are obviously so corrupt and stagnant they can't even kick a criminal out of office?
It is over! The citizens of Illinois are demanding an end to this horrible farce! Will someone please do something?
Lisa did just that, Quinn has been doing it since Day One, and now Jesse White.
Literally:
1 : in a literal sense or manner : actually
2 : in effect : virtually
USAGE: Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.
My intended meaning was that he will be drawn & quartered in the press, the written and spoken word (literally, literature, written word, etc.). Would virtually or figuratively be better words for you?
Looks like three strikes and you are out Blagoofer
TTFN
Didn't that happen in 1996 with Senator Landrieu of Louisiana? That's what my trusty reference here says.
The Supremes won't touch this if Blago or Burris sues. There's no disenfranchising of voters. You think they're going to honk off the Senate (who make their appropriations and create federal judgeships) for Blago and Burris?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Burris
(The names of his children are really Roland and Rolanda, although I'm assuming the wiki comment in my link saying that he comes "from a long line of Sudanese Arab descent" is one of those humorous wiki errors that hackers sometimes try to insert.)
No doubt that Genson will now file suit against SOS White to compel him to certify Burris.
I refuse to believe that the US Senate will retract their pledge not to appoint.
The saga will continue for days and weeks to come.
Bill, please take your Ritalin.
It would nice if the Democrats weren't making so many mistakes equivalent to building a highway with exclusive use for the Republican Party armored truck brigade.
I think a good lawyer could argue that the special election to fill Emanuel's seat meets that burden, and the state should hold the Senate replacement election at that same moment, based on existing statute without any change.
Brillant Move By Rod, plus now he can show that the tapes were indeed just "Talk".
Until people realize that this guy is going to go down fighting, and the quicker the knock-out the better it is for everyone.
(15 ILCS 305/5) (from Ch. 124, par. 5)
Sec. 5. It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State:
1. To countersign and affix the seal of state to all commissions required by law to be issued by the Governor.
2. To make a register of all appointments by the Governor, specifying the person appointed, the office conferred, the date of the appointment, the date when bond or oath is taken and the date filed. If Senate confirmation is required, the date of the confirmation shall be included in the register.
Returning us to square one.
The best possible solution is for Dick Durbin, Madigan, and some other leading Democrats to come out and tell Blago, in the media, who an acceptable person is to appoint to the seat.
Preferably a temporary caretaker (Given his age, Burris would have worked quite nicely in this role, had MJM, Dick Durbin, or someone else with a decent reputation suggested him prior to the appointment), then Blago appoints that person.
The appointee would be minimally tainted, especially if s/he accepts the appointment and says that s/he will not run for election in 2010.
That gives the 2010 Senate Candidates 2 years to prepare for running for the open seat.
It reassures the public that Blago is effectively powerless because Durbin and MJM told him what to do.
It reassures the public that Illinois Dems will police their own (the Impeachment and subsequent removal from office will strengthen such a perception).
And it helps protect us from not having a Junior Senator for god knows how long.
The other good option is for Blago to appoint Jim Edgar to the seat. Imagine that, Blago smears another Republican on his way out of office.
If nothing else, it would make for good political theater.
Obama sure does have a full plate and I think the pressure will be to get passed Burris fast and he'll be seated in the Senate.
But Illinois politics will dog Obama throughout his administration and it's going to be a very rough go for America.
Looks like SoS is setting himself up for a lawsuit by the Gov and/or RBurris if he fails to carry out his statutory duties.
I can't believe Blago is winning this battle.
Rod is hoping that the Black community will be upset if Burris is not seated and that will somehow transcend to the jury pool. he only needs one person to be acquitted.
Certification is a purely ministerial function. And if White refuses to certify the Burris appointment, then all Blago/Burris need do is ask a judge to issue a writ of mandamus directing White to do his duty. An absolute "gimme" motion, if you ask me.
(And oh, wouldn't it be something if the AG is maneuvered into having to seek the writ!!!)
In the majority opinion, [U.S. Supreme Court] Chief Justice Warren wrote that the Court’s analysis of Article I § 5
demonstrated that in judging the qualifications of its members Congress is limited to the standing qualifications prescribed in the Constitution. Respondents concede that Powell met these. Thus, there is no need to remand this case to determine whether he was entitled to be seated in the 90th Congress. Therefore, we hold that, since Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., was duly elected by the voters of the 18th Congressional District of New York and was not ineligible to serve under any provision of the Constitution, the House was without power to exclude him from its membership.
Thus, it would seem that Harry Reid lacks the authority to refuse to seat a duly-appointed Senator assuming he or she meets the constitutional requirements.
[courtesy of www.dailywrit.com ]
This is a typical Blago distraction away from the criminal issues & impeachment inquiry.
Almost as dumb as Durbin immediately calling for a special election before he realized the seat could be won by a Republican in that scenario.
Does anyone out there have a clue?
Sec. of State not certifying appointment - not following constitutional duties - no impeachment proceedings against him
AG - potentially not representing Gov in forcing Sec. of State to certify - not following constitutional duties - no impeachment proceedings against her
U.S. Senate - not seating appointment - no impeachment proceedings against any U.S. senators
Blago - doing constitutional duty by appointing replacement senator - impeachment proceedings currently ongoing
I'm just saying this for argument's sake . . .
As the story of alleged corruption by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich continues to unfold, DePaul University has experts available, including over the holiday break, who can discuss several aspects of the case. Issues they can address include the governor's legal woes; Illinois state constitutional questions; filling the vacant Illinois Senate seat; Illinois campaign finance issues; the impact the governor's plight is having on Illinois' image and Chicago's bid for the 2016 Olympics; and the media's role in the Blagojevich story.
(Media-Newswire.com) - As the story of alleged corruption by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich continues to unfold, DePaul University has experts available, including over the holiday break, who can discuss several aspects of the case. Issues they can address include the governor’s legal woes; Illinois state constitutional questions; filling the vacant Illinois Senate seat; Illinois campaign finance issues; the impact the governor’s plight is having on Illinois’ image and Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Olympics; and the media’s role in the Blagojevich story. Here are a few of DePaul’s experts:
* Len Cavise, professor, DePaul University College of Law. Cavise is a noted criminal defense attorney with expertise...omebody else to do something.†Cavise can be reached at 708/704-5965.....* Jeffrey Shaman, professor, DePaul University College of Law. Shaman is a constitutional scholar and noted authority on the First Amendment. ....* Donald Hermann, professor, DePaul University College of Law. Hermann is an expert on ethics, the insanity defense and legal competency. .....
* Woods Bowman, professor of public service, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. Bowman can comment on current and emerging problems with the state budget and government operations.
* Craig Sautter, visiting faculty, School for New Learning. Illinois governor, although he never thought it would be due to the impeachment of the seated governor. ....And the list goes on...
* Wayne Steger,
* Mike Conklin, journalism instructor, College of Communication. A longtime reporter for the Chicago Tribune and personal friend of John McCormick,....(Oh, wow)....
* Bruce Evensen, professor of communication, College of Communication. He is an expert on media ethics. ....* Bruce I. Newman, professor of marketing, College of Commerce. He is an expert in the areas of campaign finance reform, candidate image and marketing and advertising. marketing campaigns, and not necessarily those with the finest character.†Newman can be reached at 847/987-6932 or bnewman@depaul.edu.....
* Ola Adeoye, visiting assistant professor of political science, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. Adeoye is an expert on the American political system, state politics and Chicago government. .....
Media Contact:
Valerie Phillips
vphillip@depaul.edu
( 312 ) 362-5039
Of course, this all presumes that Burris will be seated. I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Rod's thinking that Jesse White and Harry Reid will blink first rather than create a constitutional crisis. It's just delusion and nothing more.
The phrase "...since Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., was duly elected by the voters of the 18th Congressional District of New York... " would need to be replaced by "Since General Roland Burris was duly appointed by the corrupt Governor of Illinois...."
I'm betting on the blink. Someone will call me delusional, but there is way too much going on in the world to waste time keeping Roland Burris out of the US Senate.
The link is at the top of the page.
Remember, we're talking about something that's, ummm, ....... "golden" here. Just four years ago, the office in question was pursued by a man who blew nearly $30 million of his personal fortune for an unsuccessful chance to obtain it. Surely a 1/3 slice of the golden thing is worth a couple hundered thou in attorney fees for what looks like a much more sure prospect.
Roland should be applauded for having the foresight for pre-planing.
That statement is exactly why so many Illinoisans are upset that Burris, and not Bill, is going to get the appointment to the US Senate.
I can't even decide what that means.
I also wonder if the certification of the SoS is an historical records keeping paperwork processing detail, or an actual bar to a governor's appointment power as authorized in the federal constitution.
But Blago should not have acted...
Quote of the year?
You can't script this stuff, classic!
Sap - not to promote mcKenna's bloviating, but the potential for this governor to be in the position to appoint the next US senator has been apparent since, at least the time that MJM was drawing up the articles of impeachment last summer. And the gov was no more or less "fit" at that time as he is now. Oh well, hindsight, 20/20, yadda yadda.
Look everyone, a kitty!!
This is soooo bizarre.
Way to go Rod, you just outdid yourself.
Look everyone, a kitty!!
This is soooo bizarre.
Way to go Rod, you just outdid yourself.
btw -- Bobby Rush is sick, yes?
(to answer big dog's question)
I'm so ashamed to live in this state.
Good for IL citizens? Probably not.
Great political theater, though.
The Chicago/Illinois way!!
Trot out the sick Bobby Rush. I listened on the radio. Was the stage also full of black ministers?
Blago has just scored his 2nd touchdown and will soon get the ball back...could be a rout
How soon until Cynthia McKinney is on a pontoon boat out in Lake Michigan in support of Burris?
This really can't get any more embarrassing for Obama. If he can't control his own state's leaders, how can he run the world. This is deplorable. I hope he is having a nice vacation.
And now comes Quinn...
Does anyone remember who Burris supported for the senate seat in 04? Did he back someone other than Obama in the primary?
Hard to believe, but this PC might be the biggest embarassment of the past 3 weeks. Way to go Illinois Dems!
This is surreal. This is "f'n golden".
Obama needs to issue a statement immediately. "I do not support this appointment. I support Secretary of State White's decision to not "certify" the appointment. We will fight them on the beaches.........we shall never surrender".
I don't know who has the larger ego Burris or Blago. I do know who has the larger head.
Blago enjoying the limelight? Impeach him TODAY.
Oh, wait, they hugged at the convention. Never mind.
On 2nd thought, I like this move, MORE MORE!!! Keep hammering on the "Self-Destruct" button.
Obama asked Blagojevich to resign.
The Guv didn't. The Guv appointed Roland Burris instead.
I'd call that quite a slap in the face.
It's time to turn OVER, you don't want to get Sunburned!!!!
BTW, your beer is getting Warm!!!
I agree with Speaking at Will for once.
I love Illinois!
It's never going to happen. I think the Governor has just given the Republicans yet another seat or two during the next cycle. It is pure spite or he has lost his mind, what’s left of it. In fact this is an additional article of impeachment, not that we can add any at this point or need to.
Madigan, Currie and Cullerton have recourse but to expedite the process immediately. You dems are beginning to hemorrhage. This state is blue, yes. But it’s not that blue. No state is that blue.
I never thought Cross had a chance as Governor until now. Keep it up and we may take the House back. I’m not kidding. Blago has done more for the Republican party of Illinois than Cross or Watson ever dreamed of doing.
What matters is how the Republican leadership reacts to all of this. Stretch this out Republicans! They are hurting and they know it.
Thanks Blago!!
Am I the only person who feels that Burris looked completely blindsided by the press reaction? What does that say about him and our current governor? Could he have looked more clueless?
I watched it on the CNN live feed (which ended up being WGN). Is it possible for Illinois to sink below "laughing stock of the nation?" After getting off the phone with some friends in Florida, I can honestly say that is the first time they called me in winter to ridicule something up here other than the weather.
Happy New Year to everyone! 2009 promises to be even wilder than any of us would have ever imagined!
Well, here we are....
I can only think of two rational reasons Blago did this:
1. To gain favor with the african american community and the CBC in order to maybe get a reduced sentence
2. To completey screw with the dems in the state.
That's it, that's all I can come up with.
Can the Blagobots come up with anything else that's rational?
Why?
Blagojevich is known to the Democrats who supported and elected him twice, right? So why are they once again surprised that he went back on a promise? He has never been trustworthy, so why are these people acting so surprised?
The Illinois Democrats have known Rod Blagojevich for years, and knew how he operated. They watched him ignor his gubernatorial duties, fight with nearly every legislator in Illinois, slash their budgets for personal gain, take revenge on his opponents by moving state offices and prisons, accuse them of being "drunken sailors", for the past six years - but they still backed him for re-election?
He was arrested three weeks ago, and yet some of them still act like his arrest was a surprise to them.
How long can the Illinois Democratic party play stupid? When will they take responsibility for empowering the worst governor in Illinois history? When will they curb the man they made governor?
Illinois' fiscal system is in meltdown. Our bills are in default. Our governor is out on bail. Yet with the exception of Fritchey, Lang, Currie and a handful of others publically demanding immediate impeachment, Illinois Democrats are looking for ways to win votes instead of doing the people's job of driving their man from office.
Blagojevich has few friends now. He has been radioactive for at least a year. Polls show he is nearly hated by a vast majority of Illinoians. Yet Illinois Democrats hum and haw looking for an escape route for themselves instead of for their constituencies.
Now this. Blagojevich proved once again that he is the one willing to take action and that he is the one with the testicular virility in Illinois government today. As he stinks up Illinois, the very idea that our legislators could rid themselves of Blagojevich without themselves stinking like trash is laughable.
All you Democrats supported Rod Blagojevich. You owe us big time. Do what we want now - impeach him and remove him from office ASAP!
I'm in a bar, with an open side facing the ocean. It's about 80 degrees here and I'm sipping a frozen drink in swimtrunks and a goofy Hawaiian shirt whilst typing away. Yes, it sucks to have to work on vacation, but it could be worse. I could be home.
I suspect Obama probably has a few choice profane words for Blago right about now...
#1) It takes a bit of the attention off of him for a week
#2) it will also take some of the attention off of him as this goes through federal court
#3) it now allows a racial element to enter the equation, where is the great savior
So although it was ridiculous, it may have been a good move.
And I really hate saying that :)
When you are losing the game, control the clock, that is exactly what the Gov is doing.
Glad you made it.
Reading some of these comments is as amusing as the shock..SHOCK of the rest of the Illinois politicos that someone was trying to trade an appointment for political favors. HERE?!? In ILLINOIS?!?
Most of you are acting like Illinois politics is pure as the wind driven snow. Illinois politicians crying racism every chance they get. If you are surprised by this, I suggest moving back to whatever kinder, gentler place you came from.
I still believe that White or the Senate can block this appointment, but if they cannot their best bets might be to completely bomb this nomination and go after Burris as hard as they can right now as previewed in one of the updates.
He's got a base. He'll do ok. He'll do OK for himself but he'll get Illinois a big cut too.
Note also that Bobby Rush beat Obama in the 2000 (I think) congressional election. Is he the only person Obama has ever lost an election to?
Yeah, talk about rubbing the Prez Elect's face into it....
Blago did this for a couple of reasons, the first and perhaps the most important is he can say that all the stuff on the tapes were simply talk. (as his attorney said yesterday) That he accepted NO money for this and that he intended to nominate Burris all along. It could potentially put doubt in a jury about the conversations on tape. (after all OJ got off)
Secondly he did so because he wanted to stand up there and thump his chest to all Republicans and Democrats, showing that he is STILL the Governor, and will be until he is removed.
Overall, if the Legislature would stop playing politics and do what is right this would never would have happened.
Not sure if you heard or saw, but ABC7 Chicago reported that on Christmas Eve Blago offered the Senate seat to Danny Davis but he turned it down.
Sounds like an escort asking the police not to think badly of her john.
Rod might very well be delusional but he has done a pretty darn good job making many of our other state office holders look pretty bad as well.
He's going to take everyone down with him. Add Burris and Rush to the list.
Unless Blago did a different press conference for radio (where I listened) than he did for TV, then there is one important point you missed about him throwing the GA under the bus. He said;
that when the general assembly failed to pass a law calling for a special election; as they said they would do, and WHICH IS SUPPORTED.
So not only did he call them hypocrites but he rubbed it in their faces that they had an opportunity to take the power away from, and he would have supported them doing so, but they failed to act on what they said they would do.
OUCH!
http://tinyurl.com/9tsk73
But, now the Dems look like a bunch of children that are arguing. "I told you not to do that!" blah, blah, blah.
We have been given lemons. Let's make lemonade.
Excellant point... and failing to first take the power to appoint, they should have paneled 50 / 50 Dems and GOP on the commission and called every witness remotely connected to keep the momentum on their side.
Inside they looked like hot air and tools of Fitz.
The Guv's got testicular virulity on his mind and today he showed it.
A messs for Illinois, a mess for Obama, a mess for America (someone mentioned Cynthia Mckinney above...the Israilis just rammed her boat she was sailing with supplies to Gaza) and Illinos is just going to overwhelm Obama with this morass.
CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT
To the President of the Senate of the United States:
This is to certify that, pursuant to the power vested in me by the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the State of __, I, A__ B__, the governor of said State, do hereby appoint C__ D__ a Senator from said State to represent said State in the Senate of the United States until the vacancy therein caused by the __ of E__ F__, is filled by election as provided by law.
Witness: His excellency our governor __, and our seal hereto affixed at ___ this __ day of __, in the year of our Lord 19__.
By the governor:
G__ H__,
Governor.
I__ J__,
Secretary of State.
i.e. No Jesse White Signature, no Senator Burris.
The "Feedback" column of New Scientist magazine refers to the coincidence of some people's names seeming to describe their job as "nominative determinism." Blago is a blagger. Coincidence or something more?
Getting back to the "property right" and "due process" issues, if the gov (who has been arrested, but as of this writing has not been indicted or impeached) makes the appointment within his lawful powers, and Burris is not certified and/or seated according to state law, the state and US Constitutions, and US Supreme Court precedent, does Burris also have a civil claim here?
Blago found a old African American pol who has been around so long and doesn't have a future to take the tainted appointment in the hopes that he can become a U.S. Senator and carry Blago's water. He doesn't care how it happens because there is no other way he will get it so he is willing to cut a deal with the devil if necessary.
He is going to be stopped by an even older African American pol who's been around even longer and who doesn't care what anybody thinks with unquestioned scruples and morals who will stop this fiasco right where it started.
Pretty weird in a Biblical sense.
Did Bill Clinton stop being president when he was under impeachment proceedings for perjury? No.
Is Jesse White going to try and block all those pardons he just issued? Did Jesse White refuse to assign public acts to the bills he signed? No.
This is the same thing. He made the appointment because he is still Governor until the GA or the US Attorney figure out a way to get him out of there. Burris is only going to be a US senator for 2 years, those pardons and bill last forever (or until repealed in the case of the laws).
Is a court of law going to say that a Senate Rule supercedes a state law. I don't know, but I don't think so.
I think Blago outmaneuvered everyone here, and that is that. It still isn't going to change the fact that he will likely be without a job in a couple of months, and may have permanent housing courtesy of US Government very soon.
As a Democrat, I am sorry to say that Blago and Burris have just assured the Republicans a seat from Illinois. Even they can't screw this up.
This is truly a shame-we could have had Valerie Jarret or some other progressive dem that would have won re-election in their sleep. Somebody has to get rid of this guy quick.
We are the politically forsaken.
Keep your shirt on. You're giving me a chubby.
The legislators are such weak individuals, I am surprised they make it to work on any given day.
Can we sent the Governor hunting with the VP?
"Rod Blagojevich, Bobby Rush double-dog dare Senate to reject Roland Burris"
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/alerts/549
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALe...
The statement:
Roland Burris is a good man and a fine public servant, but the Senate Democrats made it clear weeks ago that they cannot accept an appointment made by a governor who is accused of selling this very Senate seat. I agree with their decision, and it is extremely disappointing that Governor Blagojevich has chosen to ignore it. I believe the best resolution would be for the Governor to resign his office and allow a lawful and appropriate process of succession to take place. While Governor Blagojevich is entitled to his day in court, the people of Illinois are entitled to a functioning government and major decisions free of taint and controversy.
The Burris supporters sound so silly. They're left clutching at straws like this one. I mean, the whole state political structure and a surprising number of regular voters have been up in arms for 3 weeks trying to prevent Blags from appointing anyone, and Darlene says we would have been mad if he didn't!
If that's the best you've got, don't even try. Just call Roland and tell him not to sell the house in Centralia just yet.
He has the constitutional right to appoint the senator. The General Assembly has taken no measure to prevent that and they have taken their sweet time to move slowly on impeachment.
The Secretary of State has no legal reason to deny his signature or the placement of the state seal on the appointment.
And the U.S. Senate has no grounds to block Burris from taking his seat. Unless there is evidence that Burris tried to buy the seat since the arrest, there's no evidence connecting him to any of the governor's schemes for the seat. This is personal for Blago, it's just political. That's fair.
Roland Burris will a more legitimate U.S. Senator than Al Franken and his attempt to steal the election one questionable ballot at a time.
Hilarious, considering that the questionable behavior in the Minnesota race is the Coleman campaign's attempt to cherrypick the disputed absentee ballots in an effort to subvert the voters' will. A close race with a systematic approach to counting the ballots is a bit more legitimate than an appointment by a governor caught on tape attempting to sell the seat. Unfortunately for Burris, the question is raised: Did he have to give Blagojevich anything for the appointment? Blagojevich's behavior makes that question necessary to ask.
Like it or not... the guv followed the law today by appointing Burris. The SOS and the U.S. Senate will have to follow the letter of the law as well... which is why this appointment could very well hold up. Injecting their personal/political preference does not hold legitimate legal weight.
Under any other circumstances, Roland Burris would have been an acceptable choice, especially if he meant to be only a placeholder and his future electability were not an issue.
But the U.S. Senate, the POTUS Elect and everyone on down have sworn to high heaven for the past three weeks that Blago cannot be allowed to make this appointment, and they have to stick to that. Roland Burris did not deserve to get caught in this mess and he did make a big mistake accepting this appointment.
After Lisa's ill-considered foray into the Supreme Court, it is obvious that there is a whole lot of “leaping before looking†going on in Springfield these days.
Burris has been appointed by a sitting state Governor pursuant to a lawful power, and that Governor has not even impeached, much less tried before the Senate.
Correct me if wrong, but it is hard to see how Jesse White would have a legal leg to stand on if he refused to certify. It is not a power of veto on subjective grounds. If White does not certify, he may well be subject to a judicial writ of mandamus to force him to do so (but then again, this is Illinois - what judge would cross the Speaker that much?)
As for the Senate, Harry Reid says LOTS of things, much of which is real Clint Eastwood hard guy stuff. But I think it will be tougher to actually turn Burris away rather than just talk about it. There is Supreme Court precedent that strongly indicates that the reason for denial cannot be subjective, and must be one of objective assessment of qualification, and those requirements are minimal.
In any event, to turn a way a U.S. Senator it had better be a damned good reason, and I simply do not believe that Blago's troubles are enough. Durbin can carp about the $14,000 all he wants, but to a precedent of denying a Senator over that . . . ???? Half the Senate would have to resign.
It seems to me that Burris' real challenge is to avoid simply being annihilated by the press, the to the point where even he won't want this job.
Finally, Roland Burris is a pretty smart guy. I'll bet he looked into all the legal angles long and hard before accepting, and decided he could not be legally blocked from taking the seat.
and wins again as his appointment was valid at the time and the seat was therefore already filled by the time Quinn makes the appointment so teh Quinn appointment is a nullity; (9) this takes us right up to the 2010 election. Happy New Year!
There were probably worse but none as arrogant and self-centered. He has destroyed everyone around him, including his family. But it doesn't seem to matter to him. After all he said it himself. " I've really enjoyed all the media attention of the last few weeks.
Oh please, during his primary run for governor Rod played this guy(Burris)like a fiddle. It really was surprising how simple minded and gullible Roland was.
A few compliments from Rod and Roland was on the Blago wagon.
1. The Governor has Narcissistic Personality Disorder. What did he say about enjoying the press attention? WOW!
2. Roland Burris just threw away four decades of public service. I hope the US Senate throws him away as well. I have no respect for a man who would allow himself to be used as a pawn to pander to the one constituency group that the Governor may have on his side.
3. Someone needs to tell Bobby Rush that it's almost 2009, not 1969. He's fighting 40 year old battles. That's not change we can believe in.
Bill, what is your drink of choice? I'll send you a bottle or two when this is all over! Rich, enjoy your vacation as best you can. It's only going to get crazier next week (and the week after that...).
Personally, he flips the bird to all the people he thinks have betrayed him and are piling on: "supposed" friends like Hoffman, Emmanuel, Schakowsky, and many, many others, including Durbin and the President-elect.
Politically, by bringing Rush into the equation he says to those considering a primary run for Governor and U.S. Senate "Go ahead and oppose an african american that I've legally appointed to replace another african american U.S. Senator--step right up and get yourself an african american in the primary." Especially, mind you, if you're MJM's daughter and Pat Quinn--not especially beloved in AA community anyway.
Finally, legally. His ability to govern is not impaired in the least. He is showing up at work, he's signing bills, he's filling vacant jobs, he's working on the problems of the people. He even went so far as to fulfill his constitutional obligation to make sure Illinois has a seated 2nd Senator in D.C.--he made sure we had representation.
And as for Quinlan, if memory serves right, he was right there in the middle of some of those conversations at Rod's place. So I don't know whether the act was all that noble.
I'm not justifying any of these things; just thinking out loud here. Remember, though: personal, political and legal. Always.
As far as destroying his family, I don't think Blago has seen anything yet until Patti takes him to the cleaners in the divorce. I don't like her but I would have a little more respect for her if she got rid of that nasty wart. And it will happen. Blago's not near the bottom yet.
http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player....
===There is a point of view, as expressed by former Republican Illinois Gov. Jim Thompson on All Things Considered Tuesday, that the Illinois secretary of state has no power to refuse certification and the Senate has no power to refuse to seat an appointee who meets constitutional requirements.===
The interview is at: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?st...
I had been arguing for just letting Quinn make the appointment when he becomes governor but now I think the only real choices are either a special election or just leaving the seat vacant until 2010.
NPR had Jesse White on and he agreed with Thompson.
I wonder if Pat Quinn and others are huddling with the intention of cutting a deal with Burris: sit tight, let the impeachment process work its way through, get Quinn's endorsement after Blago is removed with the understanding Burris is one and done here, clearing the field for 2010. If Burris agrees to lay low here instead of play the guv's fool, it might play out better for him than the circle-the-wagons route. Although there will undoubtedly be a good many people who will have trouble with a Burris appointment no matter what, on principle.
Interesting to see if Quinn keeps pushing the special election ball. Does this latest act increase the clamor for a SE, or does it even matter at this point?
You don't have to be a Blago lover to think Roland Burris' nomination is on firm legal ground here. Several folks, including some attorneys, are of the same opinion. And I haven't heard a convincing rebuttal yet, other than some vague references to the US Senate's omnipotent power of rulemaking, which seems to be strongly overridden by the Powell precedent.
Jan S, White, Jackson all look like poor losers.
Like they never made a deal.
LOSERS!!!
So typical non-Capitol attire?
Burris was (and may still) be getting $5 grand a month from Jim Reynolds' Loop Capital (for what, it wasn't clear) at the same time he was chair of his buddy Blago's "blue-ribbon" pension commission.
If that had been John Glennon and Merrill Lynch, people would have been screaming to the G.
(Source: MSRB Form G-37 Disclosure Reports, 2005-06)
Burris also has this cute way of calling agency heads and saying that he was "considering" signing a lobbying contract with a particular firm and inquiring if the firm was doing any business with the agency (he already knew the answer), was the firm "held in high regard" by the agency, yada yada yada. In short, if he hadn't already signed up the company, he was assessing the difficulty of the sale beforehand without triggering any of those silly ethics reports.
AA thinks Burris will make license plates before our license plates ever read "Land of Burris," as he so obnoxiously once proclaimed.
I guess you're thanking Rod for all the traffic. Or if you're Bobby Rush, you're thanking God. Does Rod know the difference?
No, but 334 is!
Or if you're Danny Davis, you're thanking Rev. Moon, the *ahem* New Messiah, for instilling a little common sense when the question was popped to you.
Corporate types call it a separation package. I call it Pay-to-Go-Away. And notwithstanding my HallowThanksaKwanzakanakuhCrispieCreamieNewYears fundraising face plant last year, I could come up with the dough for this ;-)
Safe and happy New Years to all. This debacle will end. Sooner would be better. I just hope we are somehow improved after the trouble. Sadly, my faith is fading.
Whoa! Both US senators from far south of I-80? When's the last time that happened? I think Dixon and Simon served concurrently for a few years.
2. He can't reasonably expect to win reelection in 2 years from now.
3. Maybe he will "serve" in the US Senate, but this will not be good for his legacy.
4. Barack had it right in 2000. Bobby Rush has to go. Stapling the race card to everybody's forehead for these two pathetic people is offensive and a real blow to his legacy.
Interesting argument, and clearly different than the Powell case. I'm not a lawyer so I have no idea what the courts might do.
Agreed that Roland Burris is generally perceived as being a good and decent man, at least by IL political standards. Closer to Lincoln and Simon than Blago and Big Bill Thompson, anyway.
But just think...if Burris could have just waited a few weeks (assuming Blago could find no one else of any stature to accept his nomination), Pat Quinn may very well have given him at least an interim appointment without having to deal with the swirling maelstrom he has now.
Harry Reid swung the caucus doors wide open for Joe Liberman and gave him a nice comfortable seat as the chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
During the most recent General Election campaign; Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut) who had been embraced by the Democratic caucus; endorsed and campaigned for the Republican Presidential Nominee.
Even though the Democrats increased their majority in the Senate; and their candidate won the Presidency, Harry Reid has come out and said that Joe Lieberman will retain his committee chairmanship.
I have to believe Roland Burris should be asking Senator Reid and the other Democratic leaders (i.e. Durbin) publicly, about what appears to be a double standard here. Lieberman came back to the Senate only because his state constitution allowed for it. Burris would go to the Senate also because his state constitution allowed for the Governor to appoint him. Also, despite the fact that they called a Special Session to do so; Illinois Democratic leaders chose not to take that right away from the Governor.
Even though one was elected; and the other appointed, neither could go to the Senate with a constitutional provision allowing for their route to get there, and yet the Democrats did not refuse to seat Lieberman (and continue to support him, even after his support of McCain), but will now refuse to seat Burris.
This double standard scenario; along with the racial and potential ethnic conflict ensuing could be another problematic quagmire for Harry Reid to deal with if Burris continues to pursue this as well.
After reading the link and the comments, I am not moved that much off my previous position that Reid has a weak case, absent any direct evidence of isolated quid pro quo re: Burris and Blago, irregardless of the Jackson conversation, "flawed process" argument...but I do think that Burris' ascension might (and I stress "might") be effectively blocked by court challenges to the point that 2010 would be around the corner. It then becomes a game of who blinks first. In any case, unless an accommodation of Burris can be reached by all parties (except the soon irrelevant gov), it is very likely IL could be minus 1 US senator for a while.
What does RB want? He wants to continue as governor. Wait now to see who finds reason not to impeach; they are party to the deal.
Blago said:
“…To NOT fill the vacancy would be o deprive the people of Illinois of TWO United States Senators, to deprive the people of Illinois, their appropriate voice and votes IN the United States Senate..â€
Well, lets look at that comment for a moment.
In Barack Obama’s run for Illinois Senate, he ran on a platform of “Changeâ€. He ran on saying he was going to change Illinois Politics and would work FOR the people of Illinois.
Since his election to office, Barack Obama LEADS the United States Senate in “NO VOTESâ€. He had absolutely NO intention of serving the people of Illinois as he knew he would immediately begin his campaign for President.
We in Illinois, have been left to the ridiculous policies of Dick Durbin, Democratic Party Puppeteer.
We in Illinois have been living for the last 3 years with only ONE Senator as our voice, and HE only listened to the people who contributed heavily to HIS election.
Governor Blagojevich, how you sleep at night is beyond me, knowing your children will grow up knowing their father was almost the most corrupt politician in the state would literally shame ME to death.
Read more about Governor Blagodope at www.BlagoBlog.com
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/...
This is the correct link; you'll have to copy/paste since AA is old and doesn't know what he's doing with a computer half the time.
Off topic, but good Lord channel 20 is goofy. They're doing a piece about mortgage foreclosures, and I'll be bleeped if the first snip of b-roll isn't some generic neighborhood in North Neckersknob, but a nice 10-second pan down one of the toniest blocks on Wiggins Ave. right here in the 'patch. Pretty unlikely that the folks living in those particular cribs are missing any mortgage payments.
Don Hickman would have never let that happen.
Assuming Jesse doesn't certify (Way to go, Jesse -- you're the man!), that eats up some time...
Assuming the Senate doesn't seat Burris (jhow long does it take to determine that?), that takes up some time...
Assuming Burris or Blago sues in federal court, that takes up some time....
Assuming the final decision would be kicked up to the Supremes, that takes up some time...
Who are the four of nine Supremes who are going to sign the writ to even consider this travesty? LMAO!
If Blago is not impeached, convicted and out of office by the time it gets to the Supremes, making his appointment moot, the justices (who can tell time and read calendars) will ignore this nonsense until November 2010, making it moot.
You don't get to the Supreme Court by letting fools like Blago and Burris play you.
So it seems reasonable that you could say that the appointment process began on the day that Blagojevich said in the press that he was directing his staff to start vetting candidates, or election day, or the day Obama resigned the seat (pick any one) and concluded when he made the appointment today. During that process evidence was alledgedly gathered showing that Blagojevich tried to derive criminal benefit from the appointment process thereby tainting it and making it a fraudulent process. I imagine that Reid's lawyers will say that once the process became fraudlent it was tainted in a way that couldn't be undone, and I imagine Burris' lawyers will say that any alledged fraud ended with the Governor's arrest and everything that happened after including the appointment itself was part of a legally appropriate process.
Here I see two arguments in Reid's favor, 1) the criminal complaint is pretty strong evidence indicating fraud and Burris' lawyers would have a tough time proving that at some point the criminal behavior stopped and then he got appointed. It's not like Blagojevich is going to stand up for him and say "sure I was acting like a criminal there for a while, but I stopped that before I called up Roland and offered him the seat." And 2) the Constitution gives the Senate final say in deciding the matter so Reid only has to prove to the Supreme Court that the issue is the process and not the candidate in which case the Senate could then decide that once the process was fraudulent it remained fraudulent.
But like I said, I'm not a laywer, just a layperson so you or others may have a better opinion on the matter.
Imagine if Obama had resigned his seat to run, and these buffoons had their little circus in August, during his campaign, rather than after.
Obama must be a little embarrassed, a little angry, a little happy just to have moved on, but part of him must be just delighted that circumstances conspired to delay the debut of the Rod Blagojevich Reality TV show until December.
Number One, who is he to rule on the Rules of the Senate and the issue of separation of powers between the courts and the Senate?
Number Two, is he out of his mind? Why does he insist on degrading his own legacy by going like a moth to the TV lights for every failed and/or crooked politician that comes along?
Dude, you left office and people still liked you. What's your problem?
Rod just can't help himself... he said himself he has "enjoyed the limelight" in the past few weeks. I guess he just missed it.
Did anyone notice in the news conference how he couldn't shut up, then caught himself, and said "of course this is Roland's day... this is about Roland today."
It's a toss-up on what situation has got to be more of a nightmare to obama -- the economy or this blago-nightmare. Both situations are ones where folks are saying it will get worse before gets better...
I'm trying to see the up-side in all this, and what I'd like to see is that in both major glimpses we are providing the nation into Illinois -- corruption & race -- I really hope by putting them on display in such a blatant & ugly way, it WILL get better.
That's my hope.
1. Said that Rod would not appoint a Senate replacement,
2. Made due process arguments that have slowed the impeachment process down?
He's clearly not dealing in good faith.
ITMFA
Unless you use a standard of "guilty until proven innocent", it may take some time to determine that the selection process was any more fraudulent than normal. To a due process standard, not just the court of public opinion. Looking at the way the selection process worked or is working in NY and DE, one could argue the case that the political puffery here was no worse than the quid pro quo that could be argued is at work in those states to a contemporary standard. And again, we're a long way from seeing proof that the Burris selection, in and of itself, is illegal or tainted through a due process standard.
They acted like Rush was a surprise visitor who just happened along. Why wasn't he at the front of the room from the beginning? But, obviously, his appearance was well-planned.
It is the law.
I know many people who served at the highest level of the Burris administration who would challenge your assertion about him being a "good and decent man." They would (and may) tell you about the crooks and thugs in his administration. They would tell you about the time he used the state plane to transport his dog and his hat. They would tell you about a litany of other abuses of power and office.
I suspect that before this business is over, Roland may emerge with neither his reputation nor his career intact.
In this case, the reasons are everything to do with the appointment process, which could arguably covered under the Senate having final judgment on the election of its members. I think the argument that fraudulent appointments are analogous to fraudulent elections is a strong one. Whether they'd have to show Burris specifically was appointed improperly rather than Blago acting illegal in his appointment process is more tricky, but there certainly isn't any precedent in this area for people to predict the Supreme Court on.
If they follow due process it seems far from the forgone conclusion that lots of people think the Powell precedent makes it.
The Illinois statute on filling vacancies is real simple: 10 ILCS 5/25‑8: "When a vacancy shall occur in the office of United States Senator from this state, the Governor shall make temporary appointment to fill such vacancy until the next election of representatives in Congress."
There is no federal or state authority for White to refuse to certify. On the contrary, it's a purely ministerial act. He is primarily a recordkeeper under Article V of the State Constitution and has a duty to certify the appointment under the Secretary of State Act, 15 ILCS 305/5, which says, "It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State:
1. To countersign and affix the seal of state to all commissions required by law to be issued by the Governor.
2. To make a register of all appointments by the Governor, specifying the person appointed, the office conferred, the date of the appointment, the date when bond or oath is taken and the date filed."
Jesse White would be violating the law and would be subject to an action for mandamus, if he refuses to certify the appointment.
Fact is, while it's not what many would have wanted, what Gov. Blagojevich has done is not only legal, but was his duty as long as he has not resigned or stepped aside. I'm with Jim Thompson on this one.
Bill, of course, has some nostalgia in his heart for the Rod that Neverwas (he was only a creation in Hoffman and Bill's minds--we're seeing the real deal now, unadulterated without Bradley, without Lon to filter him).
Bill is absolutely right, though. Quinn should seat Burris. This helps him as well in an eventual primary (while Lisa and Alexi can eventually be painted as conspiring to hurt Roland, Pat has stepped up to make things right).
As for the charges. It doesn't matter what evidence is presented against Rod, whether ALL the wiretaps are laid out in full (because I guarantee you there are MORE), the bleating of innocence won't end because as he said regarding Pubic Official A, those actions don't describe him.
There are two Rods. That is the secret to this thing. Rod Jekyl and Rod Hyde. The feds just happened to arrest the wrong one. And if they arrested the right one it would be the wrong one. And so on and so on.
That's the great thing about our justice system, Emil is telling him.
Second, we have the US Senate. I beleive they are trying to distinguish the Powell case. In Powell, the congressman was accused of various corruption charges having to do with his behavior in office, but there was no question about the validity of the election. If the voters knew about the corruption charges and voted for him anyway, that's their choice (he was succeeded in the seat by Charlie Rangel). In the case of Burris, they would be looking at the appointment process and whether it was procured by fraud. The Senate did this a number of times prior to the direct election of Senators and refused to seat a Chicago appointee who had a summer place where I live.
At any rate, the Senate can take it's own sweet time doing an investigation on this, during which Burris will be denied a seat. Quinn could then make an appointment himself and allegedly "rescind" the Blago pick, and that person (probably Danny Davis) would be seated immediately. Further lawsuits would ensue, but would not be resolved prior to the 2010 election at which point it would become moot. You can see why Davis refused to take Blago up on his offer. He may come out of this smelling like a rose and get the Senate seat anyway.
He refused because he would have to give up his seat in the House and the Senate nomination is iffy.
Don't forget, Davis is a Chicago Ward Boss (Ward Committeeman).
Not exactly a good sell in 2010.
Quinn needs to resign.
16 years Ward Committeeman. Currently Democratic State Central Committeeman.
It is comical that Quinn would be upset with the Burris pick. Again the pot calling the kettle black. Quinn tied himself to Blag long enough to get reelected.
There is a problem with a special election for governor in Illinois. Is there anyone that has not been corrupted by the political filth in this state. I think not.
With Obama on board, that should be enough cover for the Senate for any race card heat. Who is going to supply that heat, anyway, and in what ways that would move the Senate?
Bill, you've just posted the funniest words I've ever seen on this blog. It's a new high - or low - for you on behalf of wrong-way-Rod.
As far as pot calling the kettle black, Quinn ran for a statewide office and was elected by the people. Burris has allowed his ego to take center stage once again. There is a link near the top of this string that shows the monument/tombstone that Burris has created for himself. We blew the photo up yesterday at work to read all that he had inscribed -- oh, my! This is a man with one very large ego! If you haven't taken a peek, do so! It says a lot about Burris!!
The fact that Quinn has gone to work everyday in a position that has allowed others to do virtually nothing, says a lot about Quinn.
Which cemetery holds this self-glorifying colossus? Someone needs to get a news team down there pronto.
It does raise the question, though, that if Alexi gets branded as being the big tent for all the Rod hangers-ons and Lisa wears the collar for MJM's perceived foot-dragging on impeachment, who makes out like the real statesman/woman for the Dems?
Maybe, none other than Daniel W. Hynes, Esq., and current resident of the Comptroller's office. Or, even though Jesse has said he will not run for higher office, maybe he responds to calls to "calm the waters" and runs to "restore integrity".
Can any of them beat a decent GOP candidate like Whitley after the smoke clears and the environmental damage is done to the Dem Party?
Only here in the Blue state of Illinois!
As an aside, Rod has enjoyed his time in the limelight, though.
I agree with an earlier observation that Rod found an old senile black man and used him as a puppet. Roland might think he has the law on his side but he has damaged what was a commendable record up to now.
If he's seated, he won't get any committee assignments and what good is he doing for Illinois then?
Burris is going to get the open Senate seat. There are no obstructions standing in his way that will fall against seating him. The obstruction options that were available have not been exercised by the Illinois General Assembly and the Illinois State Senate.
Both failed to craft a bill to place on the Governor's desk to temporarily strip him of the powers to appoint a replacement. The impeachment option has dragged its feet trying to craft a legal case for impeachment when the entire process is political from the getgo.
It's going to be almost impossible to lay the blame for this on the minority Republicans in the state. Blagojevich is capitalizing on all the failures of the Illinois legislature. He's now popped the cork in the Democrat's champagne. This filth is now going to be dragged out of the state to the nation's capitol.
Can this get any worse for the Democratic Party?
Locking in the federal pension? Oh wait. For Illinois? Good luck there.
This is where you lose it. We shouldn't be cutting our elected officials any breaks - ever. They are not gods. They work for us. We are to fire them when they give us any reasons to fire them.
We are supposed to elected our best and brightest, not lower our standards so that a criminal like Blagojevich can stay in office. We cannot get better government with the supposed standards you claim. Bill, they are far too low.
When any of our elected officials behave as Blagojevich has done, and is doing, they should be removed from office - regardless of whether their behavior is proven "tainted" or "illegal". Every politician just keeps their seat warm until the next person replaces them. We own those seats.
Defending Blagojevich is defending an individual unworthy of having ever been elected. His behavior in office demands that he be removed as soon as possible, regardless of legalities. He is a politician, not royalty.
He lied to everyone. He defamed an office even though after George Ryan, the standard of excellence was at an all-time-low. He abused us. He made us look like idiots, especially those who supported him, believed him, and had any hope for him.
This man told us he was the White Knight. After Ryan, he was to clean up Illinois. He promised ethical government. He set his own standards. He is a corrupt failure, by his own words.
We don't have to prove anything beyond the evidence he has delivered daily over the past six years in office. He is the worst governor in our lifetime, perhaps in Illinois history. If you care about our state, you will agree with 92% of your fellow citizens that Rod Blagojevich needs to be removed from office ASAP.
The law no longer matters in this case. Genson will defend him in a criminal trial. But the public's verdict of Rod Blagojevich is GUILTY!. And it is through citizens that we choose our elected officials, empower them, follow them, and trust them - not through the courts.
Time to stop the bleeding!
. . . wait a minute, already been tried.
Now I'm LOL.
That option has not been exercised. The Illinois General Assembly and the Illinois Senate turned the ball over on downs. They did not impeach immediately. They did not remove him from office the day after. They GAVE THE FOOTBALL BACK TO THE GOVERNOR.
We are getting exactly what we deserve right now. If we think the filth in our state is represented mostly or solely by Governor Blagojevich we are a voting population that deserves every last bit of scrutiny. The 49 other states should bury us right now.
The ILGA is running out of time. They have to impeach ASAP. The IL Senate has to remove the Governor the day after impeachment. The failure to exercise these options immediately has turned the state into a laughing stock.
The Governor is free to defend himself from Federal charges as a former elected official impeached and removed from office by the representatives of the people in the State of Illinois. All this posturing by Democratic lawmakers in Illinois is going to bury their party.
What was a total embarrassment, is slowly morphing into political suicide.
In the immortal words of Rodney Glen King King:
"People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Can we stop making it, making it horrible for the older people and the kids?...It’s just not right. It’s not right. It’s not, it’s not going to change anything. We’ll, we’ll get our justice....Please, we can get along here. We all can get along. I mean, we’re all stuck here for a while. Let’s try to work it out. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to work it out"
That being said; I would like everyone to take some time out this morning and run this soundtrack in the background:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3MiD_U4CHQ
while flipping through this slideshow
http://blogs.southtownstar.com/convention/2008/...
and then come back here for a group grope and to priase the lord and pass the peace pipe.
I think Roland will get the seat, but get crushed in the election.
Bill, what is next on the Governor's to do list?
By the way, Burris could have beaten Jim Ryan (in the George Ryan name confusion campaign) and certainly taken care of JBT as well.
Rollin' with Roland! I'm in!
A picture is worth a thousand words; but the video is priceless!
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/20...
But the bottom line folks is that we have no one to blame but OURSELVES for the embarrassing political mess in Illinois. We had a chance to vote for a new constitutional convention but yet were swayed by scare tactics from special interest groups who were afraid of losing the clout and power for which they pay.
We have more than a dysfunctional governor; we have a dysfunctional legislature and political process. When will we wake up and take charge of our political system? When will we stop falling for empty promises from politicians who want to keep feeding from the public trough? When will we hold our politicians’ feet to the fire and make them actually keep campaign promises and when they don’t, when will we have the guts to vote for their opponent in the next election? How about all of you who voted for Blago this last time because you were perfectly happy “at least having a democrat†and didn’t want the seat to go back to a republican? How many of you put Blago signs in your yards because you were told to do so by someone who had absolutely no power over you? How many of you signed Blago’s petition to run for governor, especially for the second term? Didn’t you know by the end of the first 4 years that he was a crook and was looking at a Federal indictment? Didn’t you know that subpoenas had been served on his office? Didn’t you remember Patrick Fitzgerald, way back then, talking about Blago’s hiring schemes? Were you absent on the days Blago made his State of the State speech and always had someone to blame (the legislature was spending like drunken sailors, or was it those mean people running the State Board of Elections). He was always throwing someone under the bus.
Wasn’t it enough that Blago forced all State employees to take his new “ethics test†and chastised them for completing a Pre-Kindergarten level test in 5 minutes, and forced them to retake it, taking more time to read and answer questions? That amounted to a whole lot of bathroom, coffee and smoke breaks just to draw out the testing process. Yet Blago apparently has not taken the test himself or, worse yet, didn’t feel it applied to him who needed it most. Ah yes, Mr. Ethics, Mr. Change, Mr. No More Business As Usual, and a lot of Illinois voters fell for it. I admit to falling for it in 2002 but not in 2006. I was eager for change. I was eager to get out from under 26 years of GOP ruling Illinois. But it didn’t take long into the first term for me to realize that we would be far better with a GOP in that seat than a crook.
Wasn’t it enough that Blago was using the State plane as his own personal aircraft? Didn’t you know that he was working largely out of his home in Chicago or his campaign headquarters and rarely showing up at either his Chicago or Springfield governor’s offices? Wasn’t his cozy relationship with Emil Jones and the games they played with legislation enough to make you puke? Wasn’t the one upsmanship with Mike Madigan and the games Madigan played enough for the people in Madigan’s district to turn Madigan out of office, along with Jones and Blago?
Who is to blame for this fiasco, this neglect, laxity, ineffectiveness, collapse, disappointment, debacle, catastrophe, this botched-up mess?
WE ARE. WE THE VOTERS ARE RESPONSIBLE. How long are we going to sit back and let it continue? When will we decide that we, the voters, the residents of Illinois, are going to take back our state politics and for once not be the State at the bottom of the ethical barrel? We deserve what we ask for, we deserve who we vote for, we deserve exactly what we have right now. This current legislature will not fix it. In fact, I’m skeptical at this point if Blago would be found guilty in the Senate. I think he is furiously calling Senators getting those much needed 20 people to not cast a guilty vote against him, if this impeachment process gets that far. I, personally, believe the House committee is just going through the motions and some are scared to death that Blago has ammunition to use against them. Otherwise, we would see this whole impeachment process sail through the House and it would have already been in the Senate for the trial. I’m beginning to believe that we are stuck with Blago unless Patrick Fitzgerald comes to our rescue.
WE MUST REMEMBER THIS. We must demand change and the only way it can ever possibly come about is for us, the voters, to remember that WE have the ultimate power. It’s time for us to stop surrendering that power
Cheswick, my guesses on why Rush wasn't up there with them to begin with:
1) Blago started on time for once, maybe Bobby thought he had some time to work with.
2) Bobby seems to be moving/ talking more slowly after sickness, and maybe took him some time to get there. (I'm not saying that to be snarky, swear to God.)
Who have they stood up to lately?
Where in this mess because very few stood up.
I'd rather have a Burris who is-what-he-is in the senate than some of the phoney reformers who never stood up.