DISQUS

CapitolFax.com: This just in… Supreme Court rejects AG Madigan motion *** GOP asks for special session ***

  • How Ironic · 1 year ago
    Huh, so he's not crazy after all.
  • predictable · 1 year ago
    Not very surprising.

    LMad's case was nullified as soon as the governor signed a bill.
  • plutocrat03 · 1 year ago
    That was not unexpected.

    At best it was a stretch. It also would have required some backbone from the court.
  • Downstate weed chewing hick · 1 year ago
    RB 1, the rest of State Government 0.
  • Segatari · 1 year ago
    Odds on Blago staying in office and beating everyone? So the ISC won't do the right thing? Why are they protecting the gov?
  • Truth · 1 year ago
    The justices have good manners. If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

    Sheesh. A rare overreach by AG. Too desperate to do something.
  • Ravenswood Right Winger · 1 year ago
    I generally think our state's judiciary is poor, but kudos to the Supremes for its correct ruling. To quote Hawk Harrelson: Lisa Madigan, she'll grab some bench!
  • downstate hack · 1 year ago
    Rejecting it without comment is disturbing. An issue this large deserves some explanation for the people the justices serve. JMHO
  • VanillaMan · 1 year ago
    My contact said that the reason for the Court not taking this route was the constitutional ability to remove Blagojevich via the impeachment process.

    It was unnecessary.
  • Gabriel · 1 year ago
    I think rejecting without comment is better. The option was a hail mary pass thrown while getting sacked.

    You want a political maneuver, do it yourself. Impeach.
  • Canseco · 1 year ago
    Bravo for the Court. It was an insulting reach by the AG.
  • Bill Baar · 1 year ago
    Bravo for the Court. It was an insulting reach by the AG

    ditto
  • True Observer · 1 year ago
    They said she was unqualified when the old man gave her AG.

    So, she's not a good lawyer after all.
  • 2for2 · 1 year ago
    The suit was a farce. One giant press release.
  • Hunterdon · 1 year ago
    Nice try anyway, Lisa. Pass incomplete. But the voters do appreciate the effort.
  • upstate · 1 year ago
    Rod will win... He's tuff as nails
  • Rocketman · 1 year ago
    No question the SCILL made the right decision as the AG's complaint was ill conceived. However, it appears that with the impeachment committee convening for only a few hours a day, it may be a long time before Blago is out of commission.
  • Anon · 1 year ago
    True Observer- I hope that was your attempt at a lame joke. Good for the AG for trying- she does represent the people of Illinois, after all. And what do the people want? They want Blago out. Even though it was successful, it was a good argument. After all, wouldn't most agree that the Gov is currently "unfit" to serve?
  • Gabriel · 1 year ago
    1st down: Blago doesn't resign.
    2nd down: ILSC denies AG claim without comment.
    3rd down: Impeachment proceedings

    Is there a 4th down? Allow me to arbitrarily limit our rights to football metaphors.
  • legal scholar · 1 year ago
    The people waÑt officials to represent their interests, not self-serving politicians falling over themselves to get on CNN to advance their political careers.
  • Undercover · 1 year ago
    If any of you had bothered to look at the law AG Madigan cited, you'd know that it left much open for interpretation. AG even said as much during her press conference. Personally, I think it was a good chance to take in hopes of swiftly removing our dunce of a governor.
  • Black Robe · 1 year ago
    The AG is lucky that the Supreme Court did not comment on the petition. It could not have been worded in any way that would have reflected positively upon the AG.
  • Say WHAT? · 1 year ago
    It was a stretch. This needs to be handled by the General Assembly.
  • Rubbernecker · 1 year ago
    LMad already won when she filed. On all 3 Sunday talking head shows plus innumerable positive press hits all over IL. She's 'doing eveything in her powers to get rid of RRB' in the eyes of the voters. She won the minute she announced her intention to file.
  • My Kind of Town · 1 year ago
    The GA's decision to impeach or not is appealable to ISC. Commenting now could result in a claim that the they made up their minds before considering an appeal from the GA's action.
  • Jack · 1 year ago
    Blago attended the University of Bill Clinton. He will never resign now. The State Supreme Court shoots down a big overreach by Lisa Madigan.
  • Anon · 1 year ago
    For everyone saying this was a political move on her part, if she wants to be governor in two years, then it would actually be better for her to have Rod as Governor than Quinn...
  • legal scholar · 1 year ago
    Gotta love the LMad apologists who defend our sainted AG. Quinn is going to be governor eventually, unless we get to down 4 (term ends). If he governs on the reforms he's been talking about LMad has problems no matter when she takes over. Instead she gets out in front and says she tried to do something too...

    It was a pathetic attempt to boost her electoral prospects.
  • Jack · 1 year ago
    Scholar I agree. Pat Quinn is well liked by many Republicans for his Pro Soldier stance and would have high approval ratings due to that.

    A DEM Primary is another matter, with the Madigan Ground troops on election day.
  • Joshua · 1 year ago
    Just wanted to point out that Bambenek's motion was also rejected.
  • Larry Mullholland · 1 year ago
    Oh Well She garnered fantastic press coverage.

    Was that what it was all about? Skeptics think so
  • sal-says · 1 year ago
    "It was a pathetic attempt to boost her electoral prospects."

    Yeah...Just tryin' to do something for the fed up citizen/taxpayers of the State; an attempt to dump the hump we call a 'governor'. Good for her.
  • The Court Jester · 1 year ago
    Hopefully someone will call her out for this cheap political stunt
  • Phineas J. Whoopee · 1 year ago
    This doesn't look good for the Attorney General-she lost-without even an explanation. If the Speaker lets this impeachment turn into a circus then both Madigan's will be stained-just like everybody else who has dealings with Blago. He is the Christmas gift that keeps giving.
  • Jack · 1 year ago
    Phineas, I believe Lisa Madigan went to the Supreme Court to pressure Blago to resign and save her father the anguish of Impeachment proceedings, knowing that the Court would punt it.

    Instead she gets a long drawn out Springfield battle that hurts the Democrats immensely.
  • Cassandra · 1 year ago
    This was always a gamble. If he is not impeached, she can say she can gave it her best effort and continue campaigning for 2010 with this on her resume.

    If he is impeached, it could look like she jumped the gun or was grandstanding and should have let the people's reps do their thing.

    I'd give her the benefit of the doubt. Like a great many Illinoisians, she thinks he can't do his job while all of this other stuff is going on.
    She had the choice of doing nothing other than uttering a few calls for resignation or actually doing something. It won't kill her career.
  • Ghost · 1 year ago
    When she failed to bring action against the Gov, complying with the reuqest from the US attorney's office, people complained aout her inaction.

    Now that she used the available legal tools at her disposal, those same voices complain about her taking action.


    The opponents of L mad are very clear; They don't like her and will stand in opposition to every act she takes just because.
  • diane · 1 year ago
    Good job by the court. I agree with others that this was nothing more than a self-serving political stunt. Not a good start for her gub campaign.
  • True Observer · 1 year ago
    "The Illinois State Supreme Court denied an emergency request from the state’s attorney general to consider removing besieged Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich from power."

    Bottom Line -

    The Supreme Court doesn't consider it an emergency.

    Back to work.
  • anon · 1 year ago
    No matter of the result at least she tried to do something. Too bad the Supremes would not look into this. The Impeachment Process may take months!! I'd love to hear then, "Why Lisa Madigan didn't try to do something." You can't have it both ways. It's almost as bad as the Chicago Sun Times Sunday Headline that Madigan is dragging his feet on impeachment. What a joke. Madigan was the only leader that stood up to this guy. Sun Times will do anything to sell newspapers!
  • Ghost · 1 year ago
    Tom Cross, the man about town, here is what we would have approved if the legislature had followed the demands and requests of mr. Cross.....lets replay a bit of history from a few months ago....

    May 28, 2008
    Gov. Blagojevich, President Poshard, Sen. Pres. Jones, Minority Leaders Sen. Watson and Rep. Cross call for passage of $31 billion Illinois Works capital plan Illinois Works invests in roads, bridges schools, creates more than 500,000 jobs SPRINGFIELD – Standing with Illinois Works Coalition Co-Chair Illinois University President Glenn Poshard, Governor Rod R. Blagojevich, Senate President Emil Jones, Senate Minority Leader Frank Watson, and House Minority Leader Tom Cross today endorsed the new $31 billion comprehensive capital infrastructure plan recommended by the Illinois Works Coalition. Last week, Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Dennis Hastert and Poshard announced their recommendations for a capital infrastructure plan and revenue streams to pay for it after a comprehensive statewide listening tour launched in March and a series of meetings with Governor Blagojevich and legislative leaders. The Governor and the three legislative leaders called for passage of the plan prior to the scheduled legislative adjournment date later this week.
  • Pot calling kettle · 1 year ago
    Let me get this straight, Cross and Radogno don't trust the Gov. to appoint a Senator but do trust him to sign the bill they hope to pass...
  • Jack · 1 year ago
    Pot, good point. Hypocritical to say the least, but a Special Election is now the only way for the new Senator to be untainted.
  • Sangamon County anti-Blago · 1 year ago
    Hey upstate!
    Your... "Rod's tough as nails", is our...."Rod has no moral compass".
  • Cheswick · 1 year ago
    As a citizen, I don't see it as political. I thank Lisa Madigan for doing her job in representing the people even if it didn't work out.
  • EmptySuitParade · 1 year ago
    Wow what a powerful statement frohm StatewideTom.
    Is his plan to elect the GOP central committee too?
    How about explaining the need to hike property taxes statewide to pay for this scheme.....what a bonehead play.....BTW which bonehead decided to ask the state to pay for Blagoof's criminal lawyer
    ?
    Genson did not seem like much of a whiz...guess the media gets hyped too early.
  • ZC · 1 year ago
    "There is one group of people we can be sure that has not been tainted by political corruption in Illinois, and that is the electorate."

    You mean that Illinois electorate that voted for George Ryan once and Rod Blagojevich twice? C'mon -- not even a teeny tiny taint?
  • Deep Water · 1 year ago
    Lisa looks like a fool.
  • Oberon · 1 year ago
    The Court owes the People an explanation of why it denied these motions. Denial without explanation is as unacceptable as Approval without explanation. Did they vote as a group, or did only one Justice make this decision? If the former, who voted which way? Was this 7-0, 6-1, 5-2, or 4-3? Who concurred, and why? Who dissented, and why?

    Given this crisis, this was fundamentally a political, not legal, decision. Lacking an explanation, the Court has not fulfilled its constitutional responsiblities to the People.

    I, for one, will not vote again for a currently sitting Justice until I receive an explanation of these decisions. The Court is as accountable to the People as the Executive and Legislative Branches. Without explanation, the Court makes it clear that it considers itself accountable to nobody but God Almighty, and perhaps not even to Him/Her.
  • Loop Lady · 1 year ago
    Lisa covered for her Dad's tight lipped non response to the FBI's action last week...but the strategy made her look like a political opportunist...one Madigan in Springpatch is enough...if Lisa is tapped by Gov. Quinn to replace Obama in the Senate, she will benefit poltically by looking at IL in her rear view mirror for a couple of years...maybe by then Dad will be retired...
  • The Doc · 1 year ago
    S-T is reporting that the feds will freeze Blago's campaign fund.
  • Cowgirl · 1 year ago
    I expected the Court to deny the motion. It is a huge legal stretch to call the governor "unfit" from a legal perspective, and this filing was a huge stretch. None of us like the governor. None of us approve of criminal conduct while in office. But those things are not what that procedure is for - it is for those times when he is unable to perform his duties.

    Here, it is able to perform his duties. The problem is not fitness, it is criminality. Those are different things, legally.

    Under these circumstances, impeachment is the means by which we may deal with the problem. Sadly, our constitution does not allow for a recall. Our remedy is impeachment.

    Until he is impeached and removed from office, he will be carrying out the duties assigned to him by our Constitution. No legislation can amend the Constitution and over-ride it. Therefore, I still don't see how anyone thinks we can simply hold a special election.
  • Bobs yer · 1 year ago
    Lawyerly observations:

    1) LM was right on with her action, I'd have done the same. No guarantee of success, but good for her for showing the guts to try it. The Rule was ripe for interpretation, and the facts were very persuasive. Whenever a Court has discretion to hear or not hear, the result is not predictable.
    The only sin is to not try and correct a wrong (in this case Rod B. claiming the continued power of governor). No one can fault her for losing... the concept of 'legal disability' goes back to Blackstone. And with Abner Mikva on the brief, only a fool would claim there was no good faith basis for the Motion.

    2) The GA was stupid to allow Genson to participate in their committee hearing. They should have sat is fat butt out on the Capital steps complaining to the press about the unfairness of putting felons in jail. Impeach the SOB, send him to trial before the Senate in a week or so, and ignore Genson's continued pleas for multiple continuences to 'properly prepare his case'.

    A good Circuit Court judge would politely listen to these 'wave the flag' arguments, then summarily deny them and call for the next case. If the GA wants to maintain any credibility, it will do the same.
  • What a mess · 1 year ago
    I am a Republican and want to see Blagojevich gone as much as the next person - but Cross' and Radogno's faith in the electorate seems a bit naive. Please, the voters elected Rod Blagojevich not once, but twice, and the voters in Cook County delivered to us Todd Stroger. I don't trust the voters with anything. I'd rather see Pat Quinn decide who will take Obama's place instead of having the voters do it.
  • 618er · 1 year ago
    Let me adjust my Blago inspired tin foil hat here.
    If the grounds for removal is either physical or mental incapacity. We have could have a problem, obviously his is still going for jogs so physical incapacity is not the issue. To be ruled mentally incapacitated in a court of law, doesn't one have to be analyzed by a psychiatric professional. Which the ag is not. and if the court would have ruled that he is mentally incapable of doing his job now, wouldn't that hand his high powered defense team a nice swift mental defense to the federal charges.

    the AG jumped the gun, but one would think a lawyer would know better than going to the state supreme court to have someone declared mentally incapacited while being brought to charge by the US attorney office.
  • cicero · 1 year ago
    Cross and Radogno built a straw man by claiming Rod had to be stopped from making a senate appointment. Circumstances have already stopped him; there's no need to change state law to do so.
  • Truth · 1 year ago
    To all you people who don't want a special election because the people are not smart enough to make a good judgment: Should we just eliminate elections?

    Who do you want to appoint the public officials in the 2010 election since the voters are too stupid?

    I understand the frustration with the voters, but get a grip.
  • Holdingontomywallet · 1 year ago
    Lisa was grand-standing. The motion never had a chance, but it did get her some coverage on national TV. When does the press start asking her "where have you been the last six years?" This has all happened under her watch as Attorney General. The feds may have asked her to back off during their investigation, but I think there is enough cake there for everyone to get a piece.
  • Dominique's US Senate Bean Sou · 1 year ago
    =And with Abner Mikva on the brief, only a fool would claim there was no good faith basis for the Motion=

    The full moon was last Friday, Bob's Yer Uncle...
  • Black Robe · 1 year ago
    Oberon, when you say that the Supreme Court owes an explanation, consider this. The majority of the Supreme Court likes Lisa M. An explanation would embarrass Lisa M. Thus, a decision with no text or explanation was the best result for Lisa M.
  • wordslinger · 1 year ago
    I don't like the idea of courts overturning elections. A legislative remedy is available and is being utilized.

    It might be painful, but maybe the next time we'll insist on better candidates.