-
Website
http://capitolfax.com/ -
Original page
http://capitolfax.com/2007/02/28/watb/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
wordslinger
96 comments · 42 points
-
Rich Miller
147 comments · 56 points
-
LoopLady
16 comments · 6 points
-
theoriginallynns
16 comments · 2 points
-
dupage dan
28 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
It's a disturbing trend; remember Phil Crane's class(less) transition and nonconcession? Or Birkett's tacky concession: "I called Lisa Madigan and told her congratulations, you're now a prosecutor."
It's like being fired or layed off, but EVERYONE knows about it.
We saw this again in Ohio in '04 as well as in Washington's gubernatorial race. It's not just arrogance but a sense of entitlement.
The question is raised, can so many Chicago aldermen be such "nutballs"? Yes, actually. I recently spoke with a well-known Chicago journalist who did extensive reporting on Chicago's aldermen. He stated that even he was shocked at how "profoundly stupid" and "out of it" many aldermen were. The best reason for that appeared to be that in wards which cover undistinguished, non-affluent neighborhoods, the only qualification for alderman is to be a more than less reliable bureaucrat. And that doesn't require intelligence, good judgment, or good character. Minimal press coverage doesn't help. Is anyone really surprised that this is the urban version of "Walking Tall"?
Will the mayor learn a lesson from the defeat of a lot of his lackeys? Not likely with over 70% of the vote.
Today, everyone knows that there is a lot of chicanery to winning.
So, why should anyone need to concede to the "better" man.
After seeing him berate and shout at his constituents in several ward forums, his belligerence comes as no surprise.
I don't think Troutman is a nutball. She is simply trying to cast herself as the victim and setting up for her eventually comeback.
That being said, you left another one off the list: Alan Keyes. For all Keyes's talk about religion and morality, he never had the personal class to concede that race.
It is the "Cable News Syndrome." These people are so used to just yelling at each other all the time they don't know how to act.
Anyone remember Rosty? He was the last one to really go out with dignity.
Almost like Marion Barry eh?
As a long time 42nd ward resident, I almost never heard from Gordon. His organization had almost no cash (in an are that should skew Republican) and in 2003 he ran no campaign. That is almost a joke: "That guy's such a lousy operative he can't raise money for Republicans in the 42nd."
I believe we need a strong two party system as a result, I would love to see a strong GOP Committeeman in the 42nd.
If Gordon doesn't retire, he should have a first class opponent in 2008.
Collectively, the Chicago City Council has become increasingly mediocre. There are fewer educated and professional types on the Council than in decades past. One of the HDO worthies on the Council is a former garbage collector.
As for Beavers, it was her first election as a candidate and she just looked shell-shocked watching her dad's machine get steamrolled.
My favorite concession remark came from Morris Udall in a 1976 presidential primary: ' The people have spoken - the bastards."
Sounds kinda like a concession to me, just not very public (the Trib says he said that to some reporters). He knows its over.
Since when does being either educated or professional equate to being honorable or ethical? What's so bad about a former garbage collector now being an alderman? Are all the citizens of Chicago highly educated and/or professional? Shouldn't those who get their hands dirty doing essential services also be represented by the Council? What about the concept of the citizen legislator--is that only predicated upon the citizen being educated or professional?
1. Rich Gordon had enough money lined up if he wanted it. He did not run for other reasons. (For example, I have been told that the unions offered Gordon the $100K money and support before Reilly. I would have been disappointed to see him take it, but that would have been his call.)
2. Gordon ran the best GOP organization in the City, by far, and delivered the Ward to GOP candidates on a reasonably consistent basis, given the registration. His organization never ran out of money. (BTW, if you were actually as knowledgable as you self-portray, you would have known that Gordon stepped down as 42nd Ward GOP Committeeman some weeks ago.)
3. You are a poor winner. Let's hope your arrogance is not indicative of the people close the new Alderman, or it will be a long four years for the residents.
Outsider,
Rich Gordon has, as noted above, stepped down to gain time for other things, is greatly enjoying life without politics (for a while, at least), and is a very happy man. I spoke with him on Election Night - he has no regrets about not running, and wishes the new Alderman all the best.
Ok then, yeah, they're for the most part a parcel of do-little, honorless, non-entities. I just felt my blue-collar dander being raised.
And yes, I do consider Anton Cermak to be our glorious, martyred mayor.
Rich Gordon could of won this election but what some politicians don't understand is that not everyone wants to always be involved in politics or run for office or be an official.
The City Council has been dumbed down. Some of the smart ones are content to make money and power on their local level. Bob Fioretti could challenge the structure as he is even smarter than Ed Burke.
How could anyone vote for Burton Natarus?
How could anyone vote for Bernie Stone?
How could anyone vote for Dorothy Tillman?
How could anyone vote for Arenda Troutman?
How could anyone vote for Shirley Coleman?
There are some real dubious alderman in Chicago. Past and present. Hopefully a few more will be past. Good riddance to Burt Natarus.
It has nothing to do with being a poor winner. My candidate didn't beat Gordon.
You are not from the 42nd. As a resident, I can tell you that I never heard of the guy. If I haven't heard of the guy, then nobody has.
That fact that the guy stepped aside and I never heard about it speaks volumes. The guy can't even get publicity when he steps down.
Finally, you are the guy who said the union money would hurt Reilly. When it comes to you and the unions, your opinions don't carry much weight.
By the way: Who's the new GOP Committeeman for 42? I would like to say I've heard of him, for a change.
â€â€U.S. Senator Roman Hruska, in defense of Harrold Carswell's nomination against charges that he was "mediocre
Please see paragraph 3 of my post above. It's about all I have for you on this.
Please see my response.
My candidate did not beat the guy. Is that clear?
Don't blame me for the fact that nobody in 42 has heard of your friend. He failed to build an organization. That is his fault, and not mine. I would like to see a strong GOP in 42 and it should be an easy thing to do. But Gordon sure was the wrong guy for the job.
As I said -- I've been in 42 for over 10 years and never heard of him. Based on what you said, I don't know who the 42nd Ward GOP Committeman is, or whether there even is one.
Given the way the start party is run, that is not exactly a shocker. Blame them for it. Don't blame me.
Gordon had $7,000 on hand at the end of 2006 as GOP Committeeman and Friends of Gordon had $4,000.00. It is pretty clear that he never contemplated a run for alderman, as he raised all of $200 in the second half of 2006.
And you believe that this guy was in shape to run for Alderman? You really believe that he had a choice and that he was doing a fine job?
Even if she is over estimating by a few hundred it implies an immense ward operation. The largest ward level operations I ever saw were in a special aldermanic election in the old days where the independent had 400 workers and the regular organization had 600. (And I didn't know what to do with some of the 400). What was the 7th Ward like on this election day? How were the Jacksons able to put together a precinct operation of this magnitude? The Beaver precinct captains must have been rolled over in the precincts. Anyone have any good 7th Ward election day stories?
Arrogant.
Disrespectful.
...Yep, seems to about sum it up. Had Daley's patronage army not fallen apart in the last four years, these three (and several of the run-offs) wouldn't have been knocked out.
Daley may be his own man now (not needing an army to win but winning on 'merit' alone), but the city council may also be coming into its own more formally than it has in even the past few upstart years.
Congratulations to Mr. Simmons. I hope he builds a strong organization that can make Chicago Democrats take the GOP seriously and keep the Democrats honest. I admittedly hope he loses every race, but I hope he loses them in squeakers. If he builds a real operation it will benefit all of us in Chicago.
But consider two pieces of advice. First, it's a big wide world of politics out there, so when you win today, you should do so with the knowledge that you can lose tomorrow. Second, I suggest you stick to topics you know something about. This obviously is not one of them.
The highest political leaders in the country can lie and be completely wrong and never be called out. The people down the hierarchy are living the same pathology on the local level.
Here is some advice:
Stick to what you know [and if you can identify any such topic, please identify the topic]. You are not from the 42nd so you don't really have a clue whether or not Gordon had an organization.
The fact that Gordon failed to create an organization is not my fault. It is his. And it is the fault of the Republican Party. If you think that he had an organization, then either you don't know what an organization is or you have never been to the 42nd.
I'm from here, and I've never heard of him. Until 3:27 today, I had never heard of Simmons. No whining on your part is going to change that. If they had an organization, I would have seen it. I haven't. And I'm from here.
You rambled on last week about how Reilly was going to lose and how Natarus's union ads were going to hit hard. As I told you, they didn't have the slighest impact and moreover, the Natarus TV ads were a joke. I recognized that and you didn't. You didn't know what you were talking about then, and you don't know what you are talking about now.
You need to stop talking about 42. You don't have a clue what's going on here.
And if you think I'm gloating, wait until we actually have a contest. My candidate didn't beat yours, so this is not gloating. When my candidate does, you may well hear from me again. Then I will gloat. If you don't like it, build an organization that can beat the Democrats. Stop whining and start building.
The real Dogs live here - Read Courtney Greve's account of the civics lesson the 19th Ward gave all of Chicago. It's too bad that the Sun Times didn't roll this story.
Whoever, thinks to runs for Mayor of Chicago ( post RMD)should note Courtney Greve's singular report for the Daily Southtown -
http://www.dailysouthtown.com/news/276465,dst
a better one, I hope, Paul.
http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?fr=ybr_sbc&a...
You spend a lot of time typing about your great wit and learning. You really don't display it though. When you go home, try and come up with some thoughts.
Other than bashing me, you really haven't come up with anything. "Gordon has a fully functioning, although invisible to ward residents, organization" doesn't really count as a quality idea. You are a smart guy. You told me so. You should see that.
As I said, there is zero connection between Reilly and Gordon. Reilly didn't beat Gordon. You can't gloat over winning when the other person wouldn't fight. The Gordon thing has nothing to do with Reilly. They are completely different matters. I am not gloating when it comes to Gordon. I was hoping he would run a high quality organization. He didn't, and that has nothing to do with Gordon. If you had any knowledge of the 42nd, you would see that.
You should drop by 42 some time. Its a great ward. Lots of great restaurants, and Navy Pier! What you will not see is a functioning GOP, but we both know that.
P.S. Wrong about Simmons. Eloise Gerson appointed by Skoien.
Are you Rich Gordan's mother? You are not taking criticism of him too well. Sorry for saying mean things about your boy, Mrs. Gordon.
First you were obsessed with the fact that I am "gloating" and now you believe that I am "emotional." You seem to spend a great deal of time caring about me. I should be flattered by the attention.
What's with the insults anyway? Why do you have to attack me for pointing out the obvious -- i.e. that Gordon did a miserable job running the 42nd for the GOP? Everyone knows that you. "Rich Gordon can't raise money for the GOP in 42." What else needs to be said?
It is hilarious that nobody knows who the 42nd ward GOP committeman is, and yet you blame Democrats for that.
Next you are going to blame us for the today's rain.
You really should stop posting and start reading. Win something, and then comment. Otherwise you just look bitter and ridiculous.
Look homeward, angel.
N.B. Rich, you really should charge for this stuff. Riling Skeeter is more fun than an entire amusement arcade. :)
Bubs, it makes my day to know there is some angry little College Republican out there who is enraged that I think Gordon has done a lousy job, who hates unions, and is annoyed beyond belief that Reilly won yesterday.
You don't "rile" me. You amuse me with your sense of self-importance matched well to your complete lack of substantive argument.
I think this is hilarious. Just knowing that there is somebody out there calling himself "Bubs", who believes himself to be a wonderful wit and who thinks that Rich Gordon ran a fine organization makes my day. I sleep better knowing the future competition is that weak.
Seriously Bubs, post somethng here when you graduate. We will all send our best wishes.
Skeeter, please stop. Bubs, please stop egging him on.
I understood that Eloise Gersen is the new Republican Committeeman in 42. Has that changed?